Enhancing Travel Reservation Benefits Through Incentive and Penalty Mechanisms in Urban Congested Roads
Source abstract
Abstract
To enhance the refinement of urban traffic demand management, this study explores the impact of introducing incentive and penalty mechanisms in the urban road travel reservation strategy (TRS) on both heterogeneous users and the road network. The existing research on TRS has primarily focused on static evaluations, which have limitations in terms of the one-sidedness of travel service methods and the homogeneity of users’ travel choices. Moreover, these studies overlook the multidimensional decision-making of travelers and the synergistic effects of urban multimodal transportation systems. To overcome these limitations, this paper introduces incentives and penalties for users and develops an agent-based multi-objective optimization model. The model optimizes travel incentive schemes to maximize social benefits, considering the interests of both system managers and travelers. Additionally, an agent-based dynamic traffic simulation model is constructed, incorporating individual travel decisions, real-time traffic conditions, and the balance of road supply and demand. The findings indicate that the introduction of incentive and penalty mechanisms increased the transportation system’s revenue by 17.26% and reduced travel costs by 2.67%. TRS implementation significantly improved traffic performance and reduced congestion across the road network. Specifically, the average speed, road saturation, and network traffic volume increased by 6.7%, 9.3%, and 3.7%, respectively. Moreover, the proportion of users participating in reservation travel increased by 48.5%, with travelers more willing to adjust their travel times. Heterogeneous travelers with different time valuations showed distinct responses to the TRS. In conclusion, TRS offers significant potential in promoting sustainable urban transportation, providing both theoretical insights and practical implications for urban planners and policymakers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transportation Planning and Optimization · Traffic control and management · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350001, China
College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
College of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundations of Fujian Province · Fujian University of Technology research start-up project
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. The flexibility of departure times for work trips10.1016/0191-2607(84)90091-8 ↗
2. Auction-based highway reservation system an agent-based simulation study10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.018 ↗
3. Basic concepts for a system for advance booking for highway use10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00006-1 ↗
4. Ravi, N., Smaldone, S., Iftode, L., and Gerla, M. (October, January 30). Lane Reservation for Highways (Position Paper). Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, Bellevue, WA, USA.
5. Proof-of-Concept Study for a Roadway Reservation System: Integrated Traffic Management Approach10.3141/2381-01 ↗
6. The Long-term Effectiveness of a Reward Scheme in Changing Daily Travel Choices10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.071 ↗
7. Will information and incentive affect traveler’s day-to-day departure time decisions?—An empirical study of decision making evolution process10.1080/15568318.2019.1570402 ↗
8. Improving Travel-Time Reliability by the Use of Trip Booking10.1109/TITS.2004.837817 ↗
9. Evaluating lane reservation problems by carbon emission approach10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.002 ↗
10. Design and evaluation of token-based reservation for a roadway system10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.001 ↗
11. Optimal Placement of Reservation-Based Intersections in Urban Networks10.1177/0361198119847616 ↗
12. Heppenstall, A.J., Crooks, A.T., See, L.M., and Batty, M. (2012). A Review of Microsimulation and Hybrid Agent-Based Approaches. Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4 ↗
13. Davidsson, P. (2001). Multi Agent Based Simulation: Beyond Social Simulation. International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation, Springer.10.1007/3-540-44561-7_7 ↗
14. Personalized Pareto-improving pricing-and-routing schemes for near-optimum freight routing: An alternative approach to congestion pricing10.1016/j.trc.2021.103004 ↗
15. Sammer, G., and Saleh, W. (2016). Travel Demand Management and Road User Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasibility, Routledge. Available online: https://worldcat.org/title/953858037.10.4324/9781315549743 ↗
16. Voluntary Travel Behavior Change Programs in Australia: The Carrot Rather Than the Stick in Travel Demand Management10.1080/15568310601092005 ↗
17. Stick or carrot for traffic demand management? Evidence from experimental economics10.1016/j.tra.2022.04.010 ↗
18. Traffic congestion pricing methodologies and technologies10.1016/j.trc.2011.02.010 ↗
19. Tradable credits for managing car travel: A review of empirical research and relevant behavioural approaches10.1080/01441647.2016.1245219 ↗
20. Is car drivers’ response to congestion charging schemes based on the correct perception of price signals?10.1016/j.tra.2014.11.004 ↗
21. Policy implementation lessons from six road pricing cases10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.003 ↗
22. Merugu, D., Prabhakar, B.S., and Rama, N. (2009, January 7). An Incentive Mechanism for Decongesting the Roads: A Pilot Program in Bangalore. Proceedings of the ACM NetEcon Workshop, Stanford, CA, USA.
23. Temporal Adaptation to Reward Schemes: Results of the SpitsScoren Project10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.091 ↗
24. Impacts of Incentive-Based Intervention on Peak Period Traffic: Experience from the Netherlands10.3141/2543-20 ↗
25. Behavior Insights for an Incentive-Based Active Demand Management Platform10.1260/2046-0430.4.2.119 ↗
26. Commuting to college: The effectiveness and social efficiency of transportation demand management policies10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.08.001 ↗
27. Innovative Traffic Demand Management Strategy: Expressway Reservation System10.3141/2245-04 ↗
28. A Basic Study on Trip Reservation Systems for Recreational Trips on Motorways10.2208/jscej.2000.660_79 ↗
29. A travel demand management strategy: The downtown space reservation system10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.026 ↗
30. Menelaou, C., Kolios, P., Timotheou, S., and Panayiotou, C.G. (2018, January 4–7). Effective Multi-region Traffic Control and Demand Management Using an Overlay Route-Reservation Scheme. Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA.10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569970 ↗
31. Menelaou, C., Kolios, P., Timotheou, S., and Panayiotou, C.G. (2015, January 15–18). Congestion Free Vehicle Scheduling Using a Route Reservation Strategy. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Gran Canaria, Spain.10.1109/ITSC.2015.340 ↗
32. Trading mechanisms for bottleneck permits with multiple purchase opportunities10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.011 ↗
33. Menelaou, C., Timotheou, S., Kolios, P., and Panayiotou, C.G. (2020, January 20–23). Flexible Route-Reservations through Pricing. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rhodes, Greece.10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294448 ↗
34. Wang, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S.-H., and Lee, H. (2017, January 3–6). Designing highway access control system using multi-class M/G/C/C state dependent queueing model and cross-entropy method. Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/WSC.2017.8247887 ↗
35. On the use of reservation-based autonomous vehicles for demand management10.1016/j.trb.2017.01.003 ↗
36. Symptoms of Complexity in a Tourism System10.3727/108354208784548797 ↗
37. Agent-based models in urban transportation: Review, challenges, and opportunities10.1186/s12544-023-00590-5 ↗
38. Taxi vs. demand responsive shared transport systems: An agent-based simulation approach10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.002 ↗
39. Dynamic autonomous vehicle fleet operations: Optimization-based strategies to assign AVs to immediate traveler demand requests10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.003 ↗
40. Integrated route choice and assignment model for fixed and flexible public transport systems10.1016/j.trc.2020.102631 ↗
41. The influence of an autonomous driving car operation on commuters’ departure times10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.015 ↗
42. Advanced Parking Space Management Strategy Design: An Agent-Based Simulation Optimization Approach10.1177/0361198118758671 ↗
43. A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation10.1017/S0269888913000118 ↗
44. Simulating participatory urban freight transport policy-making: Accounting for heterogeneous stakeholders’ preferences and interaction effects10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.006 ↗
45. Agent-Based Simulation Optimization Model for Road Surface Maintenance Scheme10.1061/JPEODX.0000097 ↗
46. Study on continuous network design problem using simulated annealing and genetic algorithm10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.023 ↗
47. Large-scale multimodal transportation network models and algorithms-Part I: The combined mode split and traffic assignment problem10.1016/j.tre.2022.102832 ↗
48. On the Impact of Income, Age, and Travel Distance on the Value of Time10.1177/0361198120966603 ↗
49. Public preference and acceptability of the travel reservation strategy in Xi’an, China10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100753 ↗
50. Chen, H., Zhou, R., Chen, H., and Lau, A. (2024). Understanding behavioral intentions in urban travel reservation: A combined model of rational motivation and social norms. Transp. Plan. Technol., 1–23.10.1080/03081060.2024.2404698 ↗
51. A bi-level programming model for the optimal lane reservation problem10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116147 ↗
52. Remote park-and-ride network equilibrium model and its applications10.1016/j.trb.2018.08.004 ↗
53. Using incentives as traffic management tool: Empirical results of the “peak avoidance” experiment10.3328/TL.2010.02.01.39-51 ↗