GeoSAE: A 3D Stratigraphic Modeling Method Driven by Geological Constraint
Source abstract
Abstract
Deep learning outperforms traditional interpolation methods in 3D geological modeling due to its ability to model nonlinear relationships and its flexibility in incorporating diverse geological data. However, acquiring geological data for practical applications is challenging, and the quality of the data can vary significantly, which limits the effectiveness of purely data-driven deep learning models in 3D geological modeling. To address this challenge, this paper introduces GeoSAE, a geoconstraint-driven 3D geological modeling method. GeoSAE improves potential field prediction by employing a stacked autoencoder network (SAE) and incorporating geological constraints as a loss function during model training. This approach generates a geologically consistent, smooth, and continuous 3D stratigraphic model. To validate the method, this study applies it to a 60-square-kilometer region in Jiangdong new district, Haikou city, China. Stratigraphic interface points were utilized to predict the 3D potential field, with PyVista (version 0.44.2) enabling the accurate extraction of stratigraphic interfaces. Model quality was evaluated through comprehensive assessments of loss function analysis, data fitting, and the verification of stratigraphic smoothness constraints. Results indicate that the stratigraphic model generated by GeoSAE closely aligns with the actual data, accurately capturing stratigraphic geometry. Additionally, incorporating smoothness constraints enhances model smoothness, minimizes irregular stratigraphic fluctuations, and produces a more natural and continuous stratigraphic morphology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geological Modeling and Analysis · Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hainan Key Laboratory of Marine Geological Resources and Environment, Haikou 570206, China
Hainan Geological Survey Institute, Haikou 570206, China
School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Funding
Hainan Marine Geological Resources and Environment Key Laboratory Open Fund · Central Geological Survey Fund Project · Hainan Geological Survey Fund Project
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. New Systems for Geological Modelling-Black Box or Best Practice?
2. McInerney, P., Goldberg, A., Calcagno, P., Courrioux, G., Guillen, A., and Seikel, R. (2007, January 9–12). Improved 3D Geology Modelling Using an Implicit Function Interpolator and Forward Modelling of Potential Field Data. Proceedings of the Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, Toronto, ON, Canada.
3. 3-D Structural Geological Models: Concepts, Methods, and Uncertainties10.1016/bs.agph.2018.09.001 ↗
4. Constrained Delaunay Tetrahedral Mesh Generation and Refinement10.1016/j.finel.2009.06.017 ↗
5. A Semi-Automatic Approach for Generating Geological Profiles by Integrating Multi-Source Data10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104190 ↗
6. A Parametric 3D Geological Modeling Method Considering Stratigraphic Interface Topology Optimization and Coding Expert Knowledge10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106300 ↗
7. A Machine Learning Approach to the Potential-Field Method for Implicit Modeling of Geological Structures10.1016/j.cageo.2017.03.015 ↗
8. A 3D Geological Model for the Ruiz-Tolima Volcanic Massif (Colombia): Assessment of Geological Uncertainty Using a Stochastic AResearch on 3D Geological Modelingpproach Based on Bézier Curve Design10.1016/j.tecto.2016.09.011 ↗
9. Interpretive Tools for 3-D Structural Geological Modeling Part I: Bezier-Based Curves, Ribbons and Grip Frames10.1023/A:1022822227691 ↗
10. Discrete Smooth Interpolation in Geometric Modelling10.1016/0010-4485(92)90054-E ↗
11. Discrete Smooth Interpolation10.1145/62054.62057 ↗
12. 3D Geomodelling Combining Implicit Surfaces and Voronoi-Based Remeshing: A Case Study in the Lorraine Coal Basin (France)10.1016/j.cageo.2015.01.009 ↗
13. Implicit Modeling of Complex Orebody with Constraints of Geological Rules10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65145-9 ↗
14. GemPy 1.0: Open-Source Stochastic Geological Modeling and Inversion10.5194/gmd-12-1-2019 ↗
15. Improving Geological Models Using a Combined Ordinary–Indicator Kriging Approach10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00246-6 ↗
16. 3D-Reconstruction of Complex Geological Interfaces from Irregularly Distributed and Noisy Point Data10.1016/j.cageo.2006.11.014 ↗
17. Reconstruction of Implicit Curves and Surfaces via RBF Interpolation10.1016/j.apnum.2016.10.016 ↗
18. RBF Interpolation with CSRBF of Large Data Sets10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.081 ↗
19. Validating 3-D Structural Models with Geological Knowledge for Improved Uncertainty Evaluations10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.391 ↗
20. Explicit-Implicit-Integrated 3-D Geological Modelling Approach: A Case Study of the Xianyan Demolition Volcano (Fujian, China)10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228648 ↗
21. Keith Turner, A., Kessler, H., and Van Der Meulen, M.J. (2021). Integrated Rule-Based Geomodeling—Explicit and Implicit Approaches. Applied Multidimensional Geological Modeling, Wiley.10.1002/9781119163091 ↗
22. Liu, L., Li, T., and Ma, C. (2024). Research on 3D Geological Modeling Method Based on Deep Neural Networks for Drilling Data. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14010423 ↗
23. Zhou, C., Ouyang, J., Ming, W., Zhang, G., Du, Z., and Liu, Z. (2019). A Stratigraphic Prediction Method Based on Machine Learning. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9173553 ↗
24. 3D Geological Structure Inversion from Noddy-Generated Magnetic Data Using Deep Learning Methods10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104701 ↗
25. SA-RelayGANs: A Novel Framework for the Characterization of Complex Hydrological Structures Based on GANs and Self-Attention Mechanism10.1029/2023WR035932 ↗
26. Automatic Reconstruction Method of 3D Geological Models Based on Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks10.1007/s10596-022-10152-8 ↗
27. Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks for Modeling Complex Hydrological Structures in Monte-Carlo Simulation10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127970 ↗
28. Three-Dimensional Structural Geological Modeling Using Graph Neural Networks10.1007/s11004-021-09945-x ↗
29. Integration of Automatic Implicit Geological Modelling in Deterministic Geophysical Inversion10.5194/se-15-63-2024 ↗
30. Deep Relative Geologic Time: A Deep Learning Method for Simultaneously Interpreting 3-D Seismic Horizons and Faults10.1029/2021JB021882 ↗
31. GeoINR 1.0: An Implicit Neural Network Approach to Three-Dimensional Geological Modelling10.5194/gmd-16-6987-2023 ↗
32. 3D Scene and Geological Modeling Using Integrated Multi-Source Spatial Data: Methodology, Challenges, and Suggestions10.1016/j.tust.2020.103393 ↗
33. An Analysis on the Use of Autoencoders for Representation Learning: Fundamentals, Learning Task Case Studies, Explainability and Challenges10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.057 ↗
34. Aster, R.C., Thurber, C.H., and Borchers, B. (2012). Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-385048-5.00010-0 ↗
35. Gropp, A., Yariv, L., Haim, N., Atzmon, M., and Lipman, Y. (2020). Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapes. arXiv.
36. Lithological Discrimination of the Mafic-Ultramafic Complex, Huitongshan, Beishan, China: Using ASTER Data10.1007/s12583-014-0437-3 ↗
37. Coastal Erosion Risk Assessment of Hainan Island, China10.1007/s13131-022-2122-1 ↗
38. Magmatic Record of the Mesozoic Geology of Hainan Island and Its Implications for the Mesozoic Tectonomagmatic Evolution of SE China: Effects of Slab Geometry and Dynamics in Continental Tectonics10.1017/S0016756820001211 ↗
39. Proterozoic Tectonics of Hainan Island in Supercontinent Cycles: New Insights from Geochronological and Isotopic Results10.1016/j.precamres.2017.01.001 ↗
40. PyVista: 3D Plotting and Mesh Analysis through a Streamlined Interface for the Visualization Toolkit (VTK)10.21105/joss.01450 ↗