Comparison of Spatial Predictability Differences in Truck Activity Patterns: An Empirical Study Based on Truck Tracking Dataset of China
Source abstract
Abstract
Existing research on truck location prediction focuses on direct trajectory prediction and ignores the link between activity patterns and predictability, whereas the mode of operation is an important factor in the difference between activity trajectories, and analyzing the mode of operation can help to develop the next-location prediction algorithms to improve the efficiency of matching truckloads and to reduce costs. Our empirical study, based on 562,071 truck trip data in China, employs Fuzzy c-means (FCM) for clustering operational patterns in space, intensity, and stability dimensions. K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Back Propagation neural (BP) network, and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) predict the next truck locations in different modes. The results indicate that range-of-motion stability significantly influences predictability. Truckers with stable spatial activity exhibit the highest predictability, with 45% nearly achieving 100% predictability. Through cluster analysis of driving characteristics, we found that truck clusters are the most predictable because of their relatively small and low-intensity activities, with the percentage of samples with prediction accuracy above 90% reaching over 80%. This research not only characterizes the freight truck community but also aids algorithm optimization by revealing predictability factors for real-world applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Transportation Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Ministry of Education Engineering Center for Transport Infrastructure Digitalization, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
The Key Laboratory of Integrated Transportation Big Data and Intelligent Control, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Research on freight truck operation characteristics based on GPS data10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.261 ↗
2. Hyperpath truck routing in an online freight exchange platform10.1287/trsc.2020.0989 ↗
3. Capturing the swarm intelligence in truckers: The foundation analysis for future swarm robotics in road freight10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100845 ↗
4. Analysis of human mobility patterns from GPS trajectories and contextual information10.1080/13658816.2015.1100731 ↗
5. Human mobility: Models and applications10.1016/j.physrep.2018.01.001 ↗
6. Limits of predictability in human mobility10.1126/science.1177170 ↗
7. Teixeira, D.D.C., Viana, A.C., Alvim, M.S., and Almeida, J.M. (2019, January 5–8). Deciphering Predictability Limits in Human Mobility. Proceedings of the SIGSPATIAL’19: 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1145/3347146.3359093 ↗
8. Whereabouts of truckers: An empirical study of predictability10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.020 ↗
9. Predicting taxi and uber demand in cities: Approaching the limit of predictability10.1109/TKDE.2019.2955686 ↗
10. Lu, X., Wetter, E., Bharti, N., Tatem, A.J., and Bengtsson, L. (2013). Approaching the limit of predictability in human mobility. Sci. Rep., 3.10.1038/srep02923 ↗
11. Beyond the limits of predictability in human mobility prediction: Context-transition predictability
12. Smith, G., Wieser, R., Goulding, J., and Barrack, D. (2014, January 24–28). A refined limit on the predictability of human mobility. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/PerCom.2014.6813948 ↗
13. Lian, D., Zhu, Y., Xie, X., and Chen, E. (2014). Analyzing location predictability on location-based social networks. Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-06608-0_9 ↗
14. Understanding predictability and exploration in human mobility10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0129-1 ↗
15. Predictability and prediction of human mobility based on application-collected location data10.1109/TMC.2020.2981441 ↗
16. Bapierre, H., Groh, G., and Theiner, S. (2011). A variable order markov model approach for mobility prediction. Pervasive Comput., 8–16.
17. Huang, Z., Xu, S., Wang, M., Wu, H., Xu, Y., and Jin, Y. (2022). Human Mobility Prediction with Causal and Spatial-constrained Multi-task Network. arXiv.
18. Kulkarni, V., Mahalunkar, A., Garbinato, B., and Kelleher, J.D. (2019). Examining the limits of predictability of human mobility. Entropy, 21.10.3390/e21040432 ↗
19. Fuel Rate Prediction for Heavy-Duty Trucks10.1109/TITS.2023.3265007 ↗
20. Truck Traffic Flow Prediction Based on LSTM and GRU Methods With Sampled GPS Data10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038788 ↗
21. Gong, J., Shang, J., Li, L., Zhang, C., He, J., and Ma, J. (2021). A comparative study on fuel consumption prediction methods of heavy-duty diesel trucks considering 21 influencing factors. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14238106 ↗
22. Truck traffic state prediction based on small sampled location data10.1504/IJHVS.2024.141417 ↗
23. Limits of predictability for large-scale urban vehicular mobility10.1109/TITS.2014.2325395 ↗
24. Bezdek, J.C. (2013). Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, Springer Science & Business Media.
25. Classifying the traffic state of urban expressways: A machine-learning approach10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.035 ↗
26. Analysis of the pattern and intensity of urban activities through aggregate cellphone usage