Integrating Machine Learning and Material Feeding Systems for Competitive Advantage in Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
In contemporary business environments, manufacturing companies must continuously enhance their performance to ensure competitiveness. Material feeding systems are of pivotal importance in the optimization of productivity, with attendant improvements in quality, reduction of costs, and minimization of delivery times. This study investigates the selection of material feeding methods, including Kanban, line-storage, call-out, and kitting systems, within a manufacturing company. The research employs six machine learning (ML) algorithms—logistic regression (LR), decision trees (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (K-NN), and artificial neural networks (ANN)—to develop a multi-class classification model for material feeding system selection. Utilizing a dataset comprising 2221 materials and an 8-fold cross-validation technique, the ANN model exhibits superior performance across all evaluation metrics. Shapley values analysis is employed to elucidate the influence of pivotal input parameters within the selection process for material feeding systems. This research provides a comprehensive framework for material feeding system selection, integrating advanced ML models with practical manufacturing insights. This study makes a significant contribution to the field by enhancing decision-making processes, optimizing resource utilization, and establishing the foundation for future studies on adaptive and scalable material feeding strategies in dynamic industrial environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jaguar Land Rover-Solihull, Lode Lane, Solihull B92 8NW, UK
Industrial Engineering Department, Bursa Uludag University, Gorukle Campus, 16059 Bursa, Turkey
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. The impact of production mix variations and models varities on the parts-feeding policy selection in a product assembly system10.1007/s00170-014-5675-0 ↗
2. Kitting versus line stocking: A conceptual framework and a descriptive model10.1016/0925-5273(92)90109-K ↗
3. Design and performance of kitting and order picking systems10.1016/0925-5273(95)00083-6 ↗
4. Material planning for production kits under uncertainty10.1080/09537280310001659164 ↗
5. An empirical assessment of the performances of three line feeding modes used in the automotive sector: Line stocking vs. kitting vs. sequencing10.1080/00207543.2014.944630 ↗
6. Set making based design of in-plant logistics processes and an application
7. A decision model for kitting and line stocking with variable operator walking distances10.1108/AA-05-2014-043 ↗
8. Advances in assembly line parts feeding policies: A literature review10.1108/AA-05-2014-047 ↗
9. A hybrid fuzzy-neural-based dynamic scheduling method for part feeding of mixed-model assembly lines10.1016/j.cie.2021.107794 ↗
10. Selection of assembly lines feeding policies based on parts features and scenario conditions10.1080/00207543.2017.1407882 ↗
11. Modeling and solving integrated assembly line balancing, assembly line feeding, and facility sizing problems10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109354 ↗
12. An adaptive approach to controlling Kanban systems10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00119-3 ↗
13. Design and simulation of assembly line feeding system in the automative sector using supermarkets, kanbans and tow trains: A general framework
14. Literature review of JIT-Kanban system10.1007/s00170-005-0340-2 ↗
15. Kanban-driven parts feeding within a semi-automated O-shaped assembly line: A case study in the automotive industry10.1108/AA-07-2014-068 ↗
16. Just-in-time parts feeding policies for paced assembly lines: Possible solutions for highly constrained layouts10.1111/itor.12173 ↗
17. Joint modelling of the order-dependent parts supply strategies sequencing, kitting and batch supply for assembly lines: Insights from industrial practice
18. The assembly line feeding problem: An extended formulation with multiple line feeding policies and a case study10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.010 ↗
19. Integrated consideration of assembly line scheduling and feeding: A new model and case study from the automotive industry10.1016/j.cie.2022.108288 ↗
20. Effects of product design on assembly lines performances: A concurrent engineering approach10.1108/02635570810883987 ↗
21. A methodology for selecting assembly systems feeding policy10.1108/02635571111099749 ↗
22. A decision model for selecting parts feeding policies in assembly lines10.1108/IMDS-02-2015-0054 ↗
23. Line feeding optimization for just in time assembly lines: An application to the automotive industry10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.009 ↗
24. In-line kitting for part feeding of assembly lines: Workload balancing and storage assignment to reduce the workers’ walking effort10.1007/s00291-023-00723-1 ↗
25. Iterated-local-search-based chaotic differential evolution algorithm for hybrid-load part feeding scheduling optimization in mixed-model assembly lines10.1108/EC-07-2023-0369 ↗
26. The impact of materials feeding design on assembly process performance10.1108/17410380910925398 ↗
27. Design of the optimal feeding policy in assembly system10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.05.016 ↗
28. Research issues on factors influencing the choice of kitting versus line stocking10.1080/00207540802456802 ↗
29. Assembly station design: A quantitative comparison of the effects of kitting and continuous supply10.1108/17410381211217399 ↗
30. Optimising part feeding in the automotive assembly industry: Deciding between kitting and line stocking10.1080/00207543.2011.588625 ↗
31. A comparison of kitting and continuous supply in in-plant materials supply10.1080/00207543.2012.657806 ↗
32. A parts feeding model for big size products: The active and idle assembly islands strategy
33. Machine learning applications in production lines: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.cie.2020.106773 ↗
34. Machine Learning for industrial applications: A comprehensive literature review10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114820 ↗
35. Exploring the application of machine learning to the assembly line feeding problem10.1007/s12063-021-00201-3 ↗
36. A supervised machine learning approach for the optimisation of the assembly line feeding mode selection10.1080/00207543.2020.1851793 ↗
37. Faccio, M., Granata, I., and Maretto, L. (2023). Modelling and managing “station-sequence” parts feeding in the I4.0 Era: A simulation approach for ın-plant logistics. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031725 ↗
38. A machine learning approach based on decision tree algorithm for classification of transient events in microgrid10.1007/s00202-023-01796-5 ↗
39. Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques
40. Ghasemkhani, B., Balbal, K.F., Birant, K.U., and Birant, D. (2024). A novel classification method: Neighborhood-based positive unlabeled learning using decision tree (NPULUD). Entropy, 26.10.3390/e26050403 ↗
41. Classification of defects in additively manufactured nickel alloys using supervised machine learning10.1080/02670836.2023.2207337 ↗
42. Supervised classification algorithms in machine learning: A survey and review10.1007/978-981-13-7403-6_11 ↗
43. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests10.1109/34.709601 ↗
44. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
45. Ong, A.K.S., Cordova, L.N.Z., Longanilla, F.A.B., Caprecho, N.L., Javier, R.A.V., Borres, R.D., and German, J.D. (2023). Purchasing ıntentions analysis of hybrid cars using random forest classifier and deep learning. World Electr. Veh. J., 14.10.3390/wevj14080227 ↗
46. Random forest clustering for discrete sequences10.1016/j.patrec.2023.09.001 ↗
47. An EWMA chart for high dimensional process with multi-class out-of-control information via random forest learning10.1080/16843703.2023.2244213 ↗
48. Zhai, X., Xu, R., Wang, Z., Zheng, Z., Shou, Y., Tian, S., Tian, L., Hu, X., Chen, L., and Xu, N. (2023). Classification of arctic sea ice type in CFOSAT scatterometer measurements using a random forest classifier. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15051310 ↗
49. The evidence framework applied to sparse kernel logistic regression10.1016/j.neucom.2004.11.021 ↗
50. Khandezamin, Z., Naderan, M., and Rashti, M.J. (2002). Detection and classification of breast cancer using logistic regression feature selection and GMDH classifier. J. Biomed. Inf., 111.10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103591 ↗
51. Random feature selection using random subspace logistic regression10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119535 ↗
52. Logistic regression was as good as machine learning for predicting major chronic diseases10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.002 ↗
53. Rymarczyk, T., Kozłowski, E., Kłosowski, G., and Niderla, K. (2019). Logistic Regression for Machine Learning in Process Tomography. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19153400 ↗
54. A new classification model using a decision tree generated from hyperplanes in dimensional space10.1080/08839514.2024.2426377 ↗
55. Classification of tweets data based on polarity using improved RBF kernel of SVM10.1007/s41870-019-00409-4 ↗
56. Comparative analysis of ıntrusion detection systems and machine learning-based model analysis through decision tree10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3296444 ↗
57. A new two-layer nearest neighbor selection method for kNN classifier10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107604 ↗
58. Chapter eleven: Correlation and association analyses in microbiome study integrating multiomics in health and disease10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.04.003 ↗
59. Survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection10.1214/09-SS054 ↗
60. Marcineková, K., and Janáková Sujová, A. (2024). Multi-objective optimization of manufacturing process using artificial neural networks. Systems, 12.10.3390/systems12120569 ↗
61. Modeling and forecasting building energy consumption: A review of data-driven techniques10.1016/j.scs.2019.101533 ↗
62. Maghraoui, A.E., Hammouc, F.E., Ledmaoui, Y., and Chebak, A. (2022, January 4). Smart energy management system: A comparative study of energy consumption prediction algorithms for a hotel building. Proceedings of the 4th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM), Cappadocia, Turkey.10.1109/GPECOM55404.2022.9815807 ↗
63. Nair, V., and Hinton, G.E. (2010, January 21–24). Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’10), Omnipress, Madison, WI, USA.
64. Symmetric-threshold ReLU for fast and nearly lossless ANN-SNN conversion10.1007/s11633-022-1388-2 ↗
65. Saleem, S., Asim, M.N., Van Elst, L., Junker, M., and Dengel, A. (2024). MLR-Predictor: A versatile and efficient computational framework for multi-label requirements classification. Front. Artif. Intell., 7.10.3389/frai.2024.1481581 ↗
66. Ghasemkhani, B., Balbal, K.F., and Birant, D. (2024). A new predictive method for classification tasks in machine learning: Multi-class multi-label logistic model tree (MMLMT). Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12182825 ↗
67. Kuhn, H.K., and Tucker, A.W. (1953). A Value for n-Person Games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume II, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400881970 ↗
68. Identifying mortality factors from machine learning using Shapley values—A case of COVID1910.1016/j.eswa.2021.114832 ↗
69. Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: Application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions10.1007/s10822-020-00314-0 ↗
70. Prioritizing causation in decision trees: A framework for interpretable modeling10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108224 ↗
71. Multiclass feature selection with metaheuristic optimization algorithms: A review10.1007/s00521-022-07705-4 ↗
72. A survey of ensemble learning: Concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3207287 ↗
73. Comparative of machine learning classification strategies for electron energy loss spectroscopy: Support vector machines and artificial neural networks10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113828 ↗
74. Wedagedara, H., Witharana, C., Fahey, R., Cerrai, D., Parent, J., and Perera, A.S. (2024). Non-parametric machine learning modeling of tree-caused power outage risk to overhead distribution powerlines. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14124991 ↗
75. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 ↗
76. Jo, I., Lee, S., and Oh, S. (2019). Improved Measures of Redundancy and Relevance for mRMR Feature Selection. Computers, 8.10.3390/computers8020042 ↗
77. Hermo, J., Bolón-Canedo, V., and Ladra, S. (2024). Fed-mRMR: A lossless federated feature selection method. Inf. Sci., 669.10.1016/j.ins.2024.120609 ↗
78. MRMR-SSA: A hybrid approach for optimal feature selection10.1007/s12065-021-00608-8 ↗
79. Cross-Validation visualized: A narrative guide to advanced methods10.3390/make6020065 ↗
80. Optimization-based stacked machine-learning method for seismic probability and risk assessment of reinforced concrete shear walls10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124897 ↗
81. Abdumalikov, S., Kim, J., and Yoon, Y. (2024). Performance analysis and improvement of machine learning with various feature selection methods for EEG-based emotion classification. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210511 ↗