Protein Identification Improvement in Complex Samples Using Higher Frequency MS Acquisition and PEAKS Software
Source abstract
Abstract
Protein identification in complex biological samples using the shotgun mode of LC-MS/MS is typically enhanced by employing longer LC columns and extended gradient times. However, improved identification rates can also be achieved by optimizing MS acquisition frequencies and employing advanced software, without increasing analysis time, thus maintaining the throughput of the method. To date, we found only one study in the literature examining the influence of MS acquisition frequency on protein identification, specifically using two ion trap mass spectrometer models. This study aims to address the gap by analyzing the impact of MS acquisition tuning of the QTOF instrument on the analysis of complex samples. Our findings indicate that increasing acquisition frequency generally improves protein identification, although the extent of improvement depends on the sample type. For CHO cell lysates, protein identifications increased by over 10%, while E. coli and albumin-depleted plasma samples demonstrated gains of 3.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Higher contributions to protein identification were also achieved with extended LC gradients, resulting in improvements of 21.6% for CHO, 18.2% for E. coli, and 10.3% for plasma. Moreover, enabling PEAKS’ deep learning feature significantly boosted identifications, with increases of 22.9% for CHO, 23.2% for E. coli, and 9.2% for plasma.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications · Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications · Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Limited Liability Partnership “National Center for Biotechnology” Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 13/5, Kurgalzhynskoye Road, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
Funding
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan · Scientific and Technical Program
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. The proteome landscape of the kingdoms of life10.1038/s41586-020-2402-x ↗
2. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function10.1038/nature19949 ↗
3. A Quantitative Study of the Effects of Chaotropic Agents, Surfactants, and Solvents on the Digestion Efficiency of Human Plasma Proteins by Trypsin10.1021/pr100656u ↗
4. Quantitative assessment of in-solution digestion efficiency identifies optimal protocols for unbiased protein analysis10.1074/mcp.M112.025585 ↗
5. Simple sodium dodecyl sulfate-assisted sample preparation method for LC-MS-based proteomics applications10.1021/ac203394r ↗
6. Evaluation of the Application of Sodium Deoxycholate to Proteomic Analysis of Rat Hippocampal Plasma Membrane10.1021/pr060112a ↗
7. Phase transfer surfactant-aided trypsin digestion for membrane proteome analysis10.1021/pr700658q ↗
8. A Clean, More Efficient Method for In-Solution Digestion of Protein Mixtures without Detergent or Urea10.1021/pr0603396 ↗
9. Rosano, G.L., and Ceccarelli, E.A. (2014). Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: Advances and challenges. Front. Microbiol., 5.10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172 ↗
10. Application of multi-omics techniques for bioprocess design and optimization in chinese hamster ovary cells10.1021/pr500219b ↗
11. Plasma Proteome Profiling to detect and avoid sample-related biases in biomarker studies10.15252/emmm.201910427 ↗
12. Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics10.1021/cr3003533 ↗
13. Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy10.1038/nbt.1661 ↗
14. Mass Spectrometry Applied to Bottom-Up Proteomics: Entering the High-Throughput Era for Hypothesis Testing10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041535 ↗
15. Methods, algorithms and tools in computational proteomics: A practical point of view10.1002/pmic.200700116 ↗
16. A comprehensive evaluation of popular proteomics software workflows for label-free proteome quantification and imputation
17. Chen, C., Hou, J., Tanner, J.J., and Cheng, J. (2020). Bioinformatics Methods for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21082873 ↗
18. Effects of column and gradient lengths on peak capacity and peptide identification in nanoflow LC-MS/MS of complex proteomic samples10.1007/s13361-012-0508-6 ↗
19. Identification of 7000-9000 Proteins from Cell Lines and Tissues by Single-Shot Microflow LC-MS/MS10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00738 ↗
20. Influence of NanoLC Column and Gradient Length as well as MS/MS Frequency and Sample Complexity on Shotgun Protein Identification of Marine Bacteria
21. High-efficiency liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry separations with 50 mm, 250 mm, and 1 m long polymer-based monolithic capillary columns for the characterization of complex proteolytic digests10.1016/j.chroma.2010.03.037 ↗
22. Effects of column length, particle size, gradient length and flow rate on peak capacity of nano-scale liquid chromatography for peptide separations10.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.016 ↗
23. A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids10.1016/0003-2697(84)90782-6 ↗
24. Rapid and Easy Enrichment Strategy for Naturally Acetylated N Termini Based on LysN Digestion and Amine-Reactive Resin Capture10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00695 ↗
25. Lysine Acetylation Goes Global: From Epigenetics to Metabolism and Therapeutics10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00181 ↗
26. Systematical Optimization of Reverse-Phase Chromatography for Shotgun Proteomics10.1021/pr900251d ↗
27. Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting10.1016/0960-9822(93)90195-T ↗
28. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
29. PEAKS DB: De novo sequencing assisted database search for sensitive and accurate peptide identification10.1074/mcp.M111.010587 ↗
30. De novo peptide sequencing by deep learning10.1073/pnas.1705691114 ↗
31. Deep learning enables de novo peptide sequencing from data-independent-acquisition mass spectrometry10.1038/s41592-018-0260-3 ↗
32. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins10.1074/mcp.M500331-MCP200 ↗
33. Comparison of protein precipitation methods for sample preparation prior to proteomic analysis10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.029 ↗
34. Comparison of protein precipitation methods from adipose tissue using difference gel electrophoresis10.1002/elps.201800124 ↗
35. Vincent, D., Ezernieks, V., Elkins, A., Nguyen, N., Moate, P.J., Cocks, B.G., and Rochfort, S. (2015). Milk Bottom-Up Proteomics: Method Optimization. Front. Genet., 6.10.3389/fgene.2015.00360 ↗
36. Comparison of protein precipitation methods for various rat brain structures prior to proteomic analysis10.1002/elps.201000197 ↗
37. Coupling a detergent lysis/cleanup methodology with intact protein fractionation for enhanced proteome characterization10.1021/pr300709k ↗
38. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics10.1038/nprot.2016.136 ↗
39. Computational Methods for Understanding Mass Spectrometry–Based Shotgun Proteomics Data10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013516 ↗
40. How many human proteoforms are there?10.1038/nchembio.2576 ↗
41. Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry10.1038/nrm2973 ↗
42. The human plasma proteome: History, character, and diagnostic prospects10.1074/mcp.R200007-MCP200 ↗
43. The dynamic range problem in the analysis of the plasma proteome10.1016/j.jprot.2009.07.001 ↗
44. On the development of plasma protein biomarkers10.1021/pr1008515 ↗
45. Geyer, P.E., Holdt, L.M., Teupser, D., and Mann, M. (2017). Revisiting biomarker discovery by plasma proteomics. Mol. Syst. Biol., 13.10.15252/msb.20156297 ↗
46. Proteomic Profiling of a High-Producing Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Culture10.1021/ac900792z ↗
47. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome10.1002/pmic.201200478 ↗
48. Systematic Evaluation of the Use of Human Plasma and Serum for Mass-Spectrometry-Based Shotgun Proteomics10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00788 ↗
49. Artificial intelligence for proteomics and biomarker discovery10.1016/j.cels.2021.06.006 ↗
50. Deep learning neural network tools for proteomics10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100003 ↗
51. Prediction of peptide mass spectral libraries with machine learning10.1038/s41587-022-01424-w ↗
52. Deep Learning in Proteomics10.1002/pmic.201900335 ↗
53. Deep learning in omics: A survey and guideline10.1093/bfgp/ely030 ↗
54. A streamlined platform for analyzing tera-scale DDA and DIA mass spectrometry data enables highly sensitive immunopeptidomics10.1038/s41467-022-30867-7 ↗
55. The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update10.1093/nar/gkac1040 ↗
56. Proteomic and interactomic insights into the molecular basis of cell functional diversity10.1038/s41580-020-0231-2 ↗
57. RNA-protein interaction detection in living cells10.1038/nmeth.4601 ↗
58. Sox proteins: Regulators of cell fate specification and differentiation10.1242/dev.091793 ↗
59. Kulyyassov, A., and Kalendar, R. (2020). In Silico Estimation of the Abundance and Phylogenetic Significance of the Composite Oct4-Sox2 Binding Motifs within a Wide Range of Species. Data, 5.10.3390/data5040111 ↗
60. Methods for the detection and analysis of protein-protein interactions10.1002/pmic.200700131 ↗
61. Kulyyassov, A. (2021). Application of Skyline for Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions In Vivo. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26237170 ↗
62. Oncogenic protein interfaces: Small molecules, big challenges10.1038/nrc3690 ↗