journal article·2025-01-04Open access

A Simple Step-by-Step Guide to the Design and Analysis of Unreplicated Split-Plot Experiments Through a Case Study on Molybdenum Recycling from CIGS Solar Cells

Ioanna Teknetzi, Hai Co Nguyen, Burçak Ebin

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 1

Abstract

Considerable effort has been put over the last few decades into clarifying the correct design and analysis of split-plot factorial experiments. However, the information found in the literature is scattered and sometimes still not easy to grasp for non-experts. Because of the importance of split-plots for the industry and the fact that any experimenter may need to use them at some point, a detailed and step-by-step guide collecting all the available information on the fundamental methodology in one place was deemed necessary. More specifically, this paper discusses the simple case of an unreplicated split-plot factorial experiment with more than one whole-plot (WP) factors and all factors set at two levels each. Explanations on how to properly design the experiment, analyze the data, and assess the proposed model are provided. Special attention is given to clarifications on the calculations of contrasts, effects, sum of squares (SS), parameters, WP and sub-plot (SP) residuals, as well as the proper division of the proposed model into its sub-designs and sub-models for calculating measures of adequacy correctly. The application of the discussed theory is showcased by a case study on the recycling of molybdenum (Mo) from CIGS solar cells. Factors expected to affect Mo recovery were investigated and the analysis showed that all of them are significant, while the way they affect the response variable was also revealed. After reading this guide, the reader is expected to acquire a good understanding of how to work with split-plots smoothly and handle with confidence more complex split-plot types.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nuclear Chemistry and Industrial Materials Recycling, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden

Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

Funding

Swedish Energy Agency · ÅForsk Foundation

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Montgomery, D.C. (2020). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons. [10th ed.]. EMEA edition.
2. Box, G., Hunter, W., and Hunter, S. (2005). Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].
3. How to Recognize a Split-Plot Experiment
4. How to Analyze a Split-Plot Experiment
5. Quality Quandaries: Two-Level Factorials Run as Split-Plot Experiments10.1080/08982119608904682 ↗
6. Split-Plot Designs: What, Why, and How10.1080/00224065.2009.11917790 ↗
7. Box, G., and Jones, S. (2000). Split-Plots for Robust Products & Process Experimentation, Center for Quality Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available online: https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/69297/r178.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
8. Split-plot designs: Discussion and examples10.1504/IJQET.2010.035588 ↗
9. Checking the Adequacy of Fit of Models from Split-Plot Designs10.1080/00224065.2009.11917782 ↗
10. Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures10.1080/00224065.1996.11979697 ↗
11. Response Surface Designs within a Split-Plot Structure10.1080/00224065.2005.11980310 ↗
12. Response surface split-plot designs: A literature review10.1002/qre.2350 ↗
13. Tichon, J.G. (2018). Response Surface Methodology for Split-Plot Designs with Categorical Factors. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manitoba].
14. Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd.
15. Complex Experiments10.2307/2983638 ↗
16. Application of the split-plot experimental design for the optimization of a catalytic procedure for the determination of Cr(VI)10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00246-3 ↗
17. Split-plot design optimization for trace determination of lead by anodic stripping voltammetry in a homogeneous ternary solvent system10.1016/j.chemolab.2003.09.004 ↗
18. Split plot design10.1038/nmeth.3293 ↗
19. Study of the Homogeneity of Drug Loaded in Polymeric Films Using Near-Infrared Chemical Imaging and Split-Plot Design10.1002/jps.24051 ↗
20. Optimization of ‘green’ extraction of carotenoids from mango pulp using split plot design and its characterization10.1016/j.lwt.2019.01.044 ↗
21. Split-plot marine experiment to assess ecophysiological responses of Gelidium corneum assemblages10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.106310 ↗
22. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024, November 20). Solar PV, Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv.
23. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (2024). Photovoltaics Report, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems.
24. Midsummer, A.B. (2024, October 02). Midsummer’s Mega Factory for the Production of Thin Film Solar Cells Will Be Located in Flen. Last Modified 29 April 2024. Available online: https://midsummer.se/en/mfn_news/midsummers-mega-factory-for-the-production-of-thin-film-solar-cells-will-be-located-in-flen/.
25. Recycling of high purity selenium from CIGS solar cell waste materials10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.021 ↗
26. Separation and recovery of valuable elements from spent CIGS materials10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05121 ↗
27. Innovative and sustainable separation and recovery of valuable metals in spent CIGS materials10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131426 ↗
28. High-yield recycling and recovery of copper, indium, and gallium from waste copper indium gallium selenide thin-film solar panels10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111691 ↗
29. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024, November 09). Final List of Critical Minerals 2022. 2022 (Last Update February 2023), Available online: https://www.iea.org/policies/15271-final-list-of-critical-minerals-2022.
30. Valuable metal recycling from thin film CIGS solar cells by leaching under mild conditions10.1016/j.solmat.2022.112178 ↗
31. An environmentally friendly method for selective recovery of silver and ITO particles from flexible CIGS solar cells
32. Grohol, M., and Veeh, C. (2023). Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023—Final Report, European Commission.10.56181/ETUQ3384 ↗
33. Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell10.1155/2018/9106269 ↗
34. Kinetics of leaching: A review10.1515/revce-2019-0073 ↗
35. Studies of Complexes of Molybdenum(VI) with Tartaric Acid in Aqueous Solution10.1007/BF00619004 ↗
36. Tungsten(VI) and Mixed Tungsten, Molybdenum(VI) Complexes of Tartaric Acid10.1007/BF00619008 ↗
37. Reactions of Mo(V1) with (2R,3R)-Tartaric Acid in Diluted Aqueous Solutions: A Study by Circular Dichroism Spectrophotometry10.1016/S0020-1693(00)80812-9 ↗
38. Novel process for decontamination and additional valorization of steel making dust processing using two-step correlative leaching10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121442 ↗
39. (2019). MATLAB, MathWorks. version 9.7. 0.1190202 (R2019b).