The Influence of Electrode Impedance on the Parameters of Visual Evoked Potentials
Source abstract
Abstract
The choice of a proper electrode is determined mainly by the type of examination. For recording spontaneous activity of the brain (EEG), two types of reusable electrodes should be considered, i.e., cup (Au, Ag, Ag/AgCl) and sintered bridge electrodes (SBEs) with a gold or silver pin. In the case of evoked potentials (EPs), only cup electrodes are used. To test the effect of electrode choice on the parameters of evoked potentials, twenty reusable electrodes of each type, i.e., Au, Ag, Ag/AgCl, were used to record visual evoked potentials (VEPs). The electrodes were then further tested by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) method. The presented research confirms the existence of an effect of the number of examinations performed with the same set of reusable cup electrodes on the values of the VEP parameters. A prolongation of the latencies and variability in the amplitudes for all the individual VEP components were observed. The obtained results suggest possible advantages of using reusable cup electrodes only once. An alternative to these electrodes may be solutions based on materials composed of polymers or dry electrodes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Visual perception and processing mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Systems, Signals and Electronic Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70310 Szczecin, Poland
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 1: Minimum Technical Requirements for Performing Clinical Electroencephalography10.1097/WNP.0000000000000308 ↗
2. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 4: Recording Clinical EEG on Digital Media10.1097/WNP.0000000000000318 ↗
3. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 5: Minimum Technical Standards for Pediatric Electroencephalography10.1097/WNP.0000000000000321 ↗
4. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 7: Guidelines for EEG Reporting10.1097/WNP.0000000000000319 ↗
5. Guideline 9A: Guidelines on Evoked Potentials10.1097/00004691-200604000-00010 ↗
6. Guideline 9B: Guidelines on Visual Evoked Potentials10.1097/00004691-200604000-00011 ↗
7. How not to read an EEG: Concluding statements
8. Niedermeyer, E., and Lopes da Silva, F. (2005). The normal EEG of the waking adult; EEG analysis: Theory and practice. Book Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
9. Fisch, B.J., and Spehlmann, R. (1999). Recording electrodes; Special methods of analysis and recording; Localized and lateralized changes of amplitude: Asymetries; Generalized changes of amplitude: Symetrically high and low amplitude. Book Fisch and Spehlmann’s EEG Primer—Basic Principles of Digital and Analog EEG, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].
10. Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research context10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02081.x ↗
11. Sanei, S., and Chambers, J.A. (2007). Fundamentals of EEG Signal Processing; Event-Related Potentials. Book EEG Signal Processing, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470511923 ↗
12. Macy, A. (2017). Signal Processing. The Handbook of Human Physiological Recording, Available online: https://alanmacy.com/chapter/chapter-6-signal-processing/.
13. Macy, A. (2017). Electrodes. The Handbook of Human Physiological Recording, Available online: https://alanmacy.com/chapter/chapter-4-electrodes/.
14. Electrical Properties of Bioelectrodes10.1109/TBME.1984.325245 ↗
15. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00533-2 ↗
16. Zhong, H., and Chen, J. (2020). Variations in the frequency and amplitude of resting-state EEG and fMRI signals in normal adults: The effects of age and sex. bioRxiv.10.1101/2020.10.02.323840 ↗
17. Geddes, L.A., and Baker, L.E. (1989). Electrodes. Book Principles of Applied Biomedical Instrumentation, John Wiley & Sons. [3rd ed.].
18. Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: Methodological review10.1109/RBME.2010.2084078 ↗
19. A Fully Flexible Hydrogel Electrode for Daily EEG Monitoring10.1109/JSEN.2022.3179416 ↗
20. Effect of Sweating on Electrode-Skin Contact Impedances and Artifacts in EEG Recordings with Various Screen-Printed Ag/Agcl Electrodes10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977172 ↗
21. Flexible and Stretchable Dry Active Electrodes with PDMS and Silver Flakes for Bio-Potentials Sensing Systems10.1109/JSEN.2021.3061949 ↗
22. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings10.1038/s41583-019-0140-6 ↗
23. Cost-Effective Printed Electrodes Based on Emerging Materials Applied to Biosignal Acquisition10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008945 ↗
24. Conducting polymer tattoo electrodes in clinical electro- and magneto-encephalography10.1038/s41528-020-0067-z ↗
25. Qureshi, S., Stojanović, G.M., Simić, M., Jeoti, V., Lashari, N., and Sher, F. (2021). Silver Conductive Threads-Based Embroidered Electrodes on Textiles as Moisture Sensors for Fluid Detection in Biomedical Applications. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14247813 ↗
26. Pattern reversal evoked potentials: Gender differences and age-related changes in amplitude and latency
27. Ziccardi, L., Cioffi, E., Barbano, L., Gioiosa, V., Falsini, B., Casali, C., and Parisi, V. (2021). Macular Morpho-Functional and Visual Pathways Functional Assessment in Patients with Spinocerebellar Type 1 Ataxia with or without Neurological Signs. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10225271 ↗
28. Effects of sustained, voluntary attention on amplitude and latency of steady-state visual evoked potential: A costs and benefits analysis10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00262-6 ↗
29. Górecka, J., and Makiewicz, P. (2019). The Dependence of Electrode Impedance on the Number of Performed EEG Examinations. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19112608 ↗
30. Contamination of reusable electroencephalography electrodes: A multicenter study10.1016/j.ajic.2018.05.021 ↗