Exploration of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Gene Electrotransfer Treatment Outcomes
Source abstract
Abstract
Gene electrotransfer (GET) is a physical method of gene delivery to various tissues utilizing pulsed electric fields to transiently permeabilize cell membranes to allow for genetic material transfer and expression. Optimal pulsing parameters dictate gene transfer efficiency and cell survival, which are critical for the wide adaptation of GET as a gene therapy technique. Tissue heterogeneity complicates the delivery process, requiring the extensive optimization of pulsing protocols currently empirically optimized. These experiments are time-consuming and resource-intensive, requiring large numbers of animals for in vivo optimization. Advances in machine learning (ML) and computing power, data analysis, and model generation using ML techniques, such as neural networks, enable predictive modeling for GET. ML models have been used previously to predict ablation performance in irreversible electroporation procedures and single-cell electroporation platforms. In this work, we present ML predictive models that could be used to optimize pulsing parameters based on already completed experiments. The models were trained on 132 data points from 19 papers with the Matlab Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox. An artificial neural network (ANN) was generated that could predict binary treatment outcomes with an accuracy of 71.8%. Support vector machines (SVMs) using selected features based on χ2 tests were also explored. All models used a maximum of 24 features as input, spread across target species, needle configuration, pulsing parameters, and plasmid parameters. Pulse voltage and pulse width dominated as the critical parameters, followed by field strength, dose, and electrode with the greatest impact on GET efficiency. This study elucidates areas where predictive ML algorithms may ideally inform GET study design to accelerate optimization and improve efficiencies upon the further training of these models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microbial Inactivation Methods · Wireless Body Area Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Medical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Entering the modern era of gene therapy10.1146/annurev-med-012017-043332 ↗
2. Transfection by electroporation10.1002/cpmb.48 ↗
3. High-efficiency in vivo gene transfer using intraarterial plasmid DNA injection following in vivo electroporation
4. In vivo gene delivery by electroporation10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00068-4 ↗
5. Boye, C., Arpag, S., Francis, M., DeClemente, S., West, A., Heller, R., and Bulysheva, A. (2022). Reduction of plasmid vector backbone length enhances reporter gene expression. Bioelectrochemistry, 144.10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107981 ↗
6. Miklavcic, D., Semrov, D., Mekid, H., and Mir, L. (2000, January 23–28). In vivo electroporation threshold determination. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (cat. No. 00CH37143), Chicago, IL, USA.
7. Meglič, S.H., and Pavlin, M. (2021). The impact of impaired DNA mobility on gene electrotransfer efficiency: Analysis in 3D model. BioMed. Eng. OnLine, 20.10.1186/s12938-021-00922-3 ↗
8. Process Analysis and Parameter Selection of Cardiomyocyte Electroporation Based on the Finite Element Method10.1007/s13239-023-00694-y ↗
9. Response characteristics and optimization of electroporation: Simulation based on finite element method10.1080/15368378.2021.1951484 ↗
10. Langus, J., Kranjc, M., Kos, B., Šuštar, T., and Miklavčič, D. (2016). Dynamic finite-element model for efficient modelling of electric currents in electroporated tissue. Sci. Rep., 6.10.1038/srep26409 ↗
11. Optimization of a gene electrotransfer method for mesenchymal stem cell transfection10.1038/gt.2008.9 ↗
12. Gene electrotransfer of plasmids encoding cytokines as an effective immunotherapy approach for melanoma10.4049/jimmunol.196.Supp.213.16 ↗
13. Dynamics of cell death due to electroporation using different pulse parameters as revealed by different viability assays10.1007/s10439-023-03309-8 ↗
14. Comparison of electroporation threshold for different cell lines in vitro10.12693/APhysPolA.115.1056 ↗
15. Electroporation-induced stress response and its effect on gene electrotransfer efficacy: In vivo imaging and numerical modeling10.1109/TBME.2019.2894659 ↗
16. Gabriel, S., Lau, R., and Gabriel, C. (1996). The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys. Med. Biol., 41.10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/003 ↗
17. A feasibility study for electrical impedance tomography as a means to monitor tissue electroporation for molecular medicine10.1109/10.991168 ↗
18. Electrical impedance tomography for imaging tissue electroporation10.1109/TBME.2004.824148 ↗
19. In vivo electrical impedance measurements during and after electroporation of rat liver10.1016/j.bioelechem.2006.10.005 ↗
20. Impedance spectroscopy as an indicator for successful in vivo electric field mediated gene delivery in a murine model10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.01.004 ↗
21. Changes of cell electrical parameters induced by electroporation. A dielectrophoresis study10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.08.030 ↗
22. Phase I trial of interleukin-12 plasmid electroporation in patients with metastatic melanoma10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6794 ↗
23. Systemic antitumor effect and clinical response in a phase 2 trial of intratumoral electroporation of plasmid interleukin-12 in patients with advanced melanoma10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.9025 ↗
24. In vivo electroporation using an exponentially enhanced pulse: A new waveform10.1089/104454901300069040 ↗
25. DNA electrotransfer into the skin using a combination of one high-and one low-voltage pulse10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.05.003 ↗
26. Gene electrotransfer enhanced by nanosecond pulsed electric fields
27. Thermal assisted in vivo gene electrotransfer10.2174/1566523216666160331125810 ↗
28. Coalesced thermal and electrotransfer mediated delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.10.004 ↗
29. López-Alonso, B., Sarnago, H., Lucía, Ó., Briz, P., and Burdío, J.M. (2020). Real-time impedance monitoring during electroporation processes in vegetal tissue using a high-performance generator. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20113158 ↗
30. Atkins, R.M., Fawcett, T.J., Gilbert, R., Hoff, A.M., Connolly, R., Brown, D.W., and Jaroszeski, M.J. (2021). Real-time impedance feedback to enhance cutaneous gene electrotransfer in a murine skin model. Bioelectrochemistry, 142.10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107885 ↗
31. Machine learning in radiology: The new frontier in interstitial lung diseases10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00230-8 ↗
32. Deep feature learning for histopathological image classification of canine mammary tumors and human breast cancer10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.072 ↗
33. A Comparison of Signal Combinations for Deep Learning-Based Simultaneous Sleep Staging and Respiratory Event Detection10.1109/TBME.2022.3225268 ↗
34. Machine learning for H-FIRE protocols: Tuning parameters for high-frequency irreversible electroporation by machine learning10.1109/MMM.2021.3086316 ↗
35. De Cillis, A., Merla, C., Tarricone, L., and Zappatore, M. (2022, January 5–9). Machine-Learning for Optimization of Electrodes and Waveforms for Electroporation. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA), Cape Town, South Africa.10.1109/ICEAA49419.2022.9900059 ↗
36. Early assessment of irreversible electroporation ablation outcomes by analyzing MRI texture: Preclinical study in an animal model of liver tumor
37. Briz, P., López-Alonso, B., Sarnago, H., Burdío, J., and Lucía, O. (2023). Tumor location on electroporation therapies by means of multi-electrode structures and machine learning. Bioelectrochemistry, 154.10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108510 ↗
38. Deep learning and computer vision strategies for automated gene editing with a single-cell electroporation platform
39. Vitale, J., Sassi, M., and Pecchia, L. (2024, January 9–13). A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Electrophysiological Responses in Genetically Modified HEK Cells. Proceedings of the European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, Portoroz, Slovenia.10.1007/978-3-031-61625-9_1 ↗
40. Duda, R.O., and Hart, P.E. (1973). Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, Wiley.
41. Bishop, C.M., and Nasrabadi, N.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.
42. In vivo gene electroinjection and expression in rat liver10.1016/0014-5793(96)00590-X ↗
43. Electrically mediated plasmid DNA delivery to hepatocellular carcinomas in vivo10.1038/sj.gt.3301173 ↗
44. Pasquet, L., Chabot, S., Bellard, E., Markelc, B., Rols, M.-P., Reynes, J.-P., Tiraby, G., Couillaud, F., Teissie, J., and Golzio, M. (2018). Safe and efficient novel approach for non-invasive gene electrotransfer to skin. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-34968-6 ↗
45. Boye, C., Arpag, S., Burcus, N., Lundberg, C., DeClemente, S., Heller, R., Francis, M., and Bulysheva, A. (2021). Cardioporation enhances myocardial gene expression in rat heart. Bioelectrochemistry, 142.10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107892 ↗
46. Chicco, D., and Jurman, G. (2020). The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genom., 21.10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 ↗
47. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d ↗
48. In vivo electrically mediated protein and gene transfer in murine melanoma10.1038/nbt0298-168 ↗
49. In vivo electroporation of plasmids encoding GM-CSF or interleukin-2 into existing B16 melanomas combined with electrochemotherapy induces long-term antitumour immunity10.1097/00008390-200012000-00010 ↗
50. Enhanced delivery of naked DNA to the skin by non-invasive in vivo electroporation10.1016/S0304-4165(02)00270-2 ↗
51. Intradermal delivery of plasmid VEGF165 by electroporation promotes wound healing10.1038/mt.2009.12 ↗
52. Electrically mediated delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin, using a multielectrode array10.1089/hum.2009.065 ↗
53. Reberšek, M., Faurie, C., Kandušer, M., Čorović, S., Teissié, J., Rols, M.-P., and Miklavčič, D. (2007). Electroporator with automatic change of electric field direction improves gene electrotransfer in-vitro. Biomed. Eng. Online, 6.10.1186/1475-925X-6-25 ↗
54. Hojman, P., Zibert, J.R., Gissel, H., Eriksen, J., and Gehl, J. (2007). Gene expression profiles in skeletal muscle after gene electrotransfer. BMC Mol. Biol., 8.10.1186/1471-2199-8-56 ↗
55. Gene electrotransfer into skin using noninvasive multi-electrode array for vaccination and wound healing10.1016/j.bioelechem.2016.12.002 ↗
56. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A gene electrotransfer promotes angiogenesis in a porcine model of cardiac ischemia10.1038/gt.2016.35 ↗
57. Greenwood, P.E., and Nikulin, M.S. (1996). A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing, John Wiley & Sons.