journal article·2024-12-03Open access

A New Parameter-Free Slope Unit Division Method That Integrates Terrain Factors

Ping Li, Junfu Fan, Yujie Du, Kuan Li, Yuke Zhou

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

With increasing research on geological hazards and the development of geographic information technology, slope units play an increasingly important role in landslide susceptibility assessment and prevention work. The scientific and reasonable division of slope units directly impacts the accuracy and practicality of analysis results. Despite the significant progress in slope unit division techniques, most existing methods still have certain limitations, such as a strong dependence on manually set thresholds during the division process, resulting in low levels of automation and efficiency. To address this issue, a new parameter-free slope unit extraction algorithm that integrates terrain factors, called Terrain Factor Parameter-Free Slope Unit Division (TFPF-SU), is introduced. This eliminates the issue of manually setting parameter thresholds during the slope unit division process. This algorithm fully utilizes the terrain information provided by digital elevation models (DEMs) to accurately calculate the curvature, slope, and aspect data for each point. On the basis of the inherent consistency principles among slope, aspect, and curvature, object-oriented image segmentation technology is used to achieve slope unit division. We select Dongchuan District in Yunnan Province, China, as a test area to verify the TFPF-SU algorithm and conduct a detailed comparative analysis and validation of the results with those obtained via traditional hydrological analysis methods from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. In the quantitative analysis, we utilize the size and shape of the slope units. The results indicate the following: ① the slope units obtained with the TFPF-SU method are more uniform in size, avoiding issues with oversized or irregularly shaped units; ② the slope unit shapes obtained with the TFPF-SU method are more reasonable, with about 70% of the units falling within a reasonable shape index range, compared to only about 32% with the hydrological method; and ③ the slope units produced by the TFPF-SU method align more closely with terrain authenticity, exhibiting a higher degree of topographical conformity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Soil and Unsaturated Flow

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China

State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System · National Key Research and Development Program

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Senouci, R., Taibi, N.-E., Teodoro, A.C., Duarte, L., Mansour, H., and Meddah, R.Y. (2021). GIS-Based Expert Knowledge for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM): Case of Mostaganem Coast District, West of Algeria. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020630 ↗
2. Modelling landslide susceptibility prediction: A review and construction of semi-supervised imbalanced theory10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104700 ↗
3. Creep deformation monitoring of landslides in a reservoir area10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130905 ↗
4. The effect of location and geometric properties of landslides caused by rainstorms and earthquakes10.1002/esp.5816 ↗
5. Risk assessment and management of rainfall-induced landslides in tropical regions: A review10.1007/s11069-023-06277-3 ↗
6. Ganga, A., Elia, M., D’ambrosio, E., Tripaldi, S., Capra, G.F., Gentile, F., and Sanesi, G. (2022). Assessing landslide susceptibility by coupling spatial data analysis and logistic model. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14148426 ↗
7. Azarafza, M., Azarafza, M., Akgün, H., Atkinson, P.M., and Derakhshani, R. (2021). Deep learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-03585-1 ↗
8. Landslide development and susceptibility along the Yunling–Yanjing segment of the Lancang River using grid and slope units10.1007/s11069-024-06495-3 ↗
9. Efficient partitioning of fine slope units considering geomorphological features
10. Slope Unit Maker (SUMak): An efficient and parameter-free algorithm for delineating slope units to improve landslide modeling10.5194/nhess-24-1-2024 ↗
11. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 ↗
12. Regional early warning model for rainfall induced landslide based on slope unit in Chongqing, China10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107464 ↗
13. Optimal slope units partitioning in landslide susceptibility mapping10.1080/17445647.2020.1805807 ↗
14. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard10.1002/esp.3290160505 ↗
15. Improvement and implementation of slope unit division method based on GIS
16. Automatic delineation of geomorphological slope units with r.slopeunits v1.0 and their optimization for landslide susceptibility modeling10.5194/gmd-9-3975-2016 ↗
17. Parameter-free delineation of slope units and terrain subdivision of Italy10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107124 ↗
18. Enhancing landslide hazard prevention: Mapping vulnerability via considering the effects of human factors10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104509 ↗
19. CAS Landslide Dataset: A Large-Scale and Multisensor Dataset for Deep Learning-Based Landslide Detection10.1038/s41597-023-02847-z ↗
20. Canavesi, V., Segoni, S., Rosi, A., Ting, X., Nery, T., Catani, F., and Casagli, N. (2020). Different approaches to use morphometric attributes in landslide susceptibility mapping based on meso-scale spatial units: A case study in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12111826 ↗
21. Susceptibility mapping of damming landslide based on slope unit using frequency ratio model10.1007/s12517-020-05689-w ↗
22. Landslide hazard evaluation: A review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1 ↗
23. Optimizing slope unit-based landslide susceptibility mapping using the priority-flood flow direction algorithm10.1016/j.catena.2023.107657 ↗
24. A new slope unit extraction method for regional landslide analysis based on morphological image analysis10.1007/s10064-018-1389-0 ↗
25. Efficient and automatic extraction of slope units based on multi-scale segmentation method for landslide assessments10.1007/s10346-021-01756-9 ↗
26. Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.013 ↗
27. Landslide susceptibility mapping in terms of the slope-unit or raster-unit, which is better?10.1007/s12583-021-1407-1 ↗
28. Landslide size matters: A new data-driven, spatial prototype10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106288 ↗
29. Yu, C., and Chen, J. (2020). Landslide susceptibility mapping using the slope unit for southeastern Helong City, Jilin Province, China: A comparison of ANN and SVM. Symmetry, 12.10.3390/sym12061047 ↗
30. Nation-wide, general-purpose delineation of geomorphological slope units in Italy
31. Slope unit extraction methods: Advances and prospects
32. Adaptive image region-growing10.1109/83.336259 ↗
33. Seeded region growing10.1109/34.295913 ↗
34. Xu, H., Cheng, W., Wang, B., Song, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, R., and Bao, A. (2024). Effects of Geomorphic Spatial Differentiation on Vegetation Distribution Based on Remote Sensing and Geomorphic Regionalization. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16061062 ↗
35. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography10.1002/esp.3290120107 ↗
36. Different slope units division-based geohazard susceptibility evaluation of support vector machine optimized by sparrow search algorithm10.1007/s13762-023-05223-x ↗
37. Preliminary Study on the Automatic Extraction of Terrain Factors in Forest Resource Planning and Design Surveys
38. Slope unit-based genetic landform mapping on Tibetan plateau—A terrain unit-based framework for large spatial scale landform classification10.1016/j.catena.2023.107757 ↗
39. The geometric signature: Quantifying landslide-terrain types from digital elevation models10.1007/BF00890333 ↗