journal article·2024-11-26Open access

NAS-CRE: Neural Architecture Search for Context-Based Relation Extraction

Rongen Yan, Dongmei Li, Yan Wu, Depeng Dang, Ye Tao, Shaofei Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

Relation extraction, a crucial task in natural language processing (NLP) for constructing knowledge graphs, entails extracting relational semantics between pairs of entities within a sentence. Given the intricacy of language, a single sentence often encompasses multiple entities that mutually influence one another. Recently, various iterations of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have been introduced into relation extraction tasks, where the efficacy of neural network structures directly influences task performance. However, many neural networks necessitate manual determination of optimal parameters and network architectures, resulting in limited generalization capabilities for specific tasks. In this paper, we formally define the context-based relation extraction problem and propose a solution utilizing neural architecture search (NAS) to optimize RNN. Specifically, NAS employs an RNN controller to delineate an RNN cell, yielding an optimal structure to represent all relationships, thereby aiding in extracting relationships between target entities. Additionally, to enhance relation extraction performance, we leverage the XLNet pretrained model to comprehensively capture the semantic features of the sentence. Extensive experiments conducted on a real-world dataset containing words with multiple relationships demonstrate that our proposed method significantly enhances micro-F1 scores compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Semantic Web and Ontologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Engineering Research Center for Forestry-Oriented Intelligent Information Processing of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100083, China

CSSC Systems Engineering Research Institute, Beijing 100094, China

CSSC Intelligent Innovation Research Institute, Beijing 100094, China

School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Zhongguancun Laboratory, Beijing 100094, China

College of Information Engineering, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

Funding

The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Nature Science Foundation of China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang, Y., Lipka, N., Rossi, R.A., Siu, A., Zhang, R., and Derr, T. (2024, January 20–27). Knowledge graph prompting for multi-document question answering. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29889 ↗
2. A Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Syntactic Skills and Reading Comprehension: A Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Investigation10.3102/00346543241228185 ↗
3. Non-autoregressive Machine Translation with Probabilistic Context-free Grammar
4. Vanillanet: The power of minimalism in deep learning
5. A relation aware embedding mechanism for relation extraction10.1007/s10489-021-02699-3 ↗
6. Exploit Feature and Relation Hierarchy for Relation Extraction10.1109/TASLP.2022.3153256 ↗
7. A survey on model-based reinforcement learning10.1007/s11432-022-3696-5 ↗
8. SaberNet: Self-attention based effective relation network for few-shot learning10.1016/j.patcog.2022.109024 ↗
9. Joint entity and relation extraction with set prediction networks10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3264735 ↗
10. Sorokin, D., and Gurevych, I. (2017, January 9–11). Context-aware representations for knowledge base relation extraction. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/D17-1188 ↗
11. Yuan, L., Cai, Y., Wang, J., and Li, Q. (2023, January 7–14). Joint multimodal entity-relation extraction based on edge-enhanced graph alignment network and word-pair relation tagging. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA.10.1609/aaai.v37i9.26309 ↗
12. Fabregat, H., Duque, A., Martinez-Romo, J., and Araujo, L. (2023). Negation-based transfer learning for improving biomedical Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction. J. Biomed. Inform., 138.10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104279 ↗
13. Improving feature extraction using a hybrid of CNN and LSTM for entity identification10.1007/s11063-022-11122-y ↗
14. Image caption generation using visual attention prediction and contextual spatial relation extraction10.1186/s40537-023-00693-9 ↗
15. Xlnet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding
16. Named Entity Recognition by Using XLNet-BiLSTM-CRF10.1007/s11063-021-10547-1 ↗
17. Survey of Supervised Joint Entity Relation Extraction Methods
18. RankSum—An unsupervised extractive text summarization based on rank fusion10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116846 ↗
19. Semi-supervised and unsupervised anomaly detection by mining numerical workflow relations from system logs10.1007/s10515-022-00370-w ↗
20. Sun, A., Grishman, R., and Sekine, S. (2011, January 19–24). Semi-supervised relation extraction with large-scale word clustering. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, OR, USA.
21. Nguyen, T.H., and Grishman, R. (2014, January 23–24). Employing word representations and regularization for domain adaptation of relation extraction. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, MD, USA.10.3115/v1/P14-2012 ↗
22. Zeng, D., Liu, K., Chen, Y., and Zhao, J. (2015, January 17–21). Distant supervision for relation extraction via piecewise convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Lisbon, Portugal.10.18653/v1/D15-1203 ↗
23. Syntax-aware entity representations for neural relation extraction10.1016/j.artint.2019.07.004 ↗
24. Wang, L., Cao, Z., De Melo, G., and Liu, Z. (2016, January 7–12). Relation classification via multi-level attention cnns. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany.10.18653/v1/P16-1123 ↗
25. Piecewise convolutional neural networks with position attention and similar bag attention for distant supervision relation extraction10.1007/s10489-021-02632-8 ↗
26. Vu, N.T., Adel, H., Gupta, P., and Schütze, H. (2016). Combining recurrent and convolutional neural networks for relation classification. arXiv.10.18653/v1/N16-1065 ↗
27. Yang, D., Wang, S., and Li, Z. (2018). Ensemble neural relation extraction with adaptive boosting. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2018/630 ↗
28. Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., and Fu, G. (2017, January 9–11). End-to-end neural relation extraction with global optimization. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/D17-1182 ↗
29. Wang, S., Zhang, Y., Che, W., and Liu, T. (2018, January 13–19). Joint extraction of entities and relations based on a novel graph scheme. Proceedings of the IJCAI, Stockholm, Sweden.10.24963/ijcai.2018/620 ↗
30. Weighted graph convolution over dependency trees for nontaxonomic relation extraction on public opinion information10.1007/s10489-021-02596-9 ↗
31. Joint extraction of entities and overlapping relations by improved graph convolutional networks10.1007/s10489-021-02667-x ↗
32. Zhang, Y., Qi, P., and Manning, C.D. (2018). Graph convolution over pruned dependency trees improves relation extraction. arXiv.10.18653/v1/D18-1244 ↗
33. Improve relation extraction with dual attention-guided graph convolutional networks10.1007/s00521-020-05087-z ↗
34. Sikaroudi, M., Hosseini, M., Gonzalez, R., Rahnamayan, S., and Tizhoosh, H. (2023). Generalization of vision pre-trained models for histopathology. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-33348-z ↗
35. Mishra, S. (2019, January 17–20). Multi-dataset-multi-task neural sequence tagging for information extraction from tweets. Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, Hof, Germany.10.1145/3342220.3344929 ↗
36. MT-clinical BERT: Scaling clinical information extraction with multitask learning10.1093/jamia/ocab126 ↗
37. Contrastive information extraction with generative transformer10.1109/TASLP.2021.3110126 ↗
38. Pre-trained models: Past, present and future10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002 ↗
39. Zoph, B., and Le, Q.V. (2016). Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. arXiv.
40. Neural architecture search: A survey
41. Xiao, H., Li, L., Liu, Q., Zhu, X., and Zhang, Q. (2023). Transformers in medical image segmentation: A review. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 84.10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104791 ↗
42. Mao, C., Wu, Y., Xu, J., and Yu, S.H. (2023, January 20–23). Random graph matching at Otter’s threshold via counting chandeliers. Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1145/3564246.3585156 ↗
43. Object detection in 20 years: A survey10.1109/JPROC.2023.3238524 ↗
44. Precise region semantics-assisted GAN for pose-guided person image generation10.1049/cit2.12255 ↗
45. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. arXiv.