Engineering and Clinical Study of Surface Geometry of Clear Aligners at the Nanoscale
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates the evolution of the outer surface geometry of Invisalign®—clear orthodontic aligners—caused by degradation triggered by wearing. The obtained results served to confirm whether or not the aligners could continue to be used once their wear time in the therapeutic procedure had ended, taking both their geometric and mechanical features into account. The measurements were performed using atomic force microscopy which allowed the mapping of nanomechanical properties. The obtained images were then processed to determine statistical and functional surface geometry parameters in accordance with relevant ISO standards. The results revealed that the unrepeatability of the manufacturing process causes the surface shape parameters of new aligners to be irregular; however, these features become gradually consistent for worn samples. On the other hand, properly used aligners may change in two ways: the outer layer flattens and its thickness decreases, and at the same time the Young’s modulus of the material decreases. It follows that the degradation processes may be caused by tribological phenomena (abrasion of contact surfaces) and/or biochemical phenomena (biofilm growth, decomposition of the material under the influence of enzymes in the oral cavity).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental materials and restorations · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Periodontology Department, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
Faculty of Technical Sciences, Warmia and Mazury University in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Early orthodontic treatment: Current clinical perspectives10.1016/j.aodf.2006.07.003 ↗
2. Rakosi, T., and Graber, T.M. (2010). Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedic Treatment, Thieme.10.1055/b-002-79370 ↗
3. Partouche, A.J.D., Castro, F., Baptista, A.S., Costa, L.G., Fernandes, J.C.H., and Fernandes, G.V.O. (2022). Effects of Multibracket Orthodontic Treatment versus Clear Aligners on Periodontal Health: An Integrative Review. Dent. J., 21.10.3390/dj10100177 ↗
4. Optical coherence tomography as a non-invasive method of enamel thickness diagnosis after orthodontic treatment by 3 different types of brackets10.17219/acem/79974 ↗
5. Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste10.1515/bmt-2016-0241 ↗
6. The milk molars of Perissodactyla, with remarks on molar occlusion10.1111/j.1096-3642.1952.tb00784.x ↗
7. A review of methodology and quantification in dental microwear analysis
8. Error rates in dental microwear quantification using scanning electron microscopy10.1002/sca.4950240307 ↗
9. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets10.1016/j.micron.2010.05.013 ↗
10. Memè, L., Notarstefano, V., Sampalmieri, F., Orilisi, G., and Quinzi, V. (2021). ATR-FTIR Analysis of Orthodontic Invisalign® Aligners Subjected to Various In Vitro Aging Treatments. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14040818 ↗
11. Tamburrino, F., D’Antò, V., Bucci, R., Alessandri-Bonetti, G., Barone, S., and Razionale, A.V. (2020). Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Polymers for Aligner Manufacturing: In Vitro Study. Dent. J., 8.10.3390/dj8020047 ↗
12. Mechanical properties of “two generations” of teeth aligners: Change analysis during oral permanence10.4012/dmj.2017-323 ↗
13. Do the mechanical and chemical properties of Invisalign TM appliances change after use? A retrieval analysis10.1093/ejo/cjv003 ↗
14. Tian, K.V., Passaretti, F., Nespoli, A., Placidi, E., Condò, R., Andreani, C., Licoccia, S., Chass, G.A., Senesi, R., and Cozza, P. (2019). Composition-Nanostructure Steered Performance Predictions in Steel Wires. Nanomaterials, 9.10.3390/nano9081119 ↗
15. Improving the Accuracy of Nanomechanical Measurements with Force-Curve-Based AFM Techniques
16. Streltsov, D.R., Borisov, K.M., Kalinina, A.A., and Muzafarov, A.M. (2023). Quantitative Elasticity Mapping of Submicron Silica Hollow Particles by PeakForce QNM AFM Mode. Nanomaterials, 13.10.3390/nano13131916 ↗
17. Kazaili, A., Abdul-Amir Al-Hindy, H., Madine, J., and Akhtar, R. (2021). Nano-Scale Stiffness and Collagen Fibril Deterioration: Probing the Cornea Following Enzymatic Degradation Using Peakforce-QNM AFM. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051629 ↗
18. Kwaśniewska, A., Świetlicki, M., Prószyński, A., and Gładyszewski, G. (2021). The Quantitative Nanomechanical Mapping of Starch/Kaolin Film Surfaces by Peak Force AFM. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13020244 ↗
19. Chang, X., Hallais, S., Danas, K., and Roux, S. (2023). PeakForce AFM Analysis Enhanced with Model Reduction Techniques. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23104730 ↗
20. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Areal—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters (Standard No. ISO 25178-2).
21. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗
22. Changes in mechanical properties, surface morphology, structure, and composition of Invisalign material in the oral environment10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.023 ↗
23. The mechanical properties of dental thermoplastic materials in a simulated intraoral environment10.1016/j.odw.2006.03.003 ↗
24. Short-term chemical and physical changes in Invisalign appliances
25. Forces and moments generated by removable thermoplastic aligners: Incisor torque, premolar derotation, and molar distalization10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.015 ↗
26. Forces and moments applied during derotation of a maxillary central incisor with thinner aligners: An in-vitro study10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.020 ↗