Show source-provided references
1. Severino, A., Curto, S., Barberi, S., Arena, F., and Pau, G. (2021). Autonomous Vehicles: An Analysis Both on Their Distinctiveness and the Potential Impact on Urban Transport Systems. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app11083604 ↗2. Maurer, M., Gerdes, J., Lenz, B., and Winner, H. (2015). Die Freigabe des autonomen Fahrens. Autonomes Fahren, Springer.
10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9 ↗3. Ziemska-Osuch, M., and Osuch, D. (2022). Modeling the assessment of intersections with traffic lights and the significance level of the number of pedestrians in microsimulation models based on the PTV Vissim tool. Sustainability, 14.
10.3390/su14148945 ↗4. Aimsun (2024, November 13). Aimsun Next 23 User’s Manual, Aimsun Next 23.0.0, Barcelona, Spain. Available online: https://docs.aimsun.com/next/23.0.0/.
5. Fries, A., Fahrenkrog, F., Donauer, K., Mai, M., and Raisch, F. (2022, January 5–9). Driver behavior model for the safety assessment of automated driving. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), IEEE, Aachen, Germany.
10.1109/IV51971.2022.9827404 ↗6. Krajzewicz, D., Hertkorn, G., Rössel, C., and Wagner, P. (2002). SUMO (Simulation of Urban MObility)-an open-source traffic simulation. A. Al-Akaidi (Hg.), Proceedings of the 4th middle East Symposium on Simulation and Modelling (MESM20002), Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, 28–30 September 2002, SCS Publishing House.
8. Intersection analysis using computer vision techniques with SUMO
9. Krauß, S. (2024, November 13). Microscopic Modeling of Traffic Flow: Investigation of Collision Free Vehicle Dynamics; Report Number: DLR-FB-98-08, available from TIB Hannover RN 437(98-08), 1998; pp. 1–126, ISSN: 1434–8454. Available online: https://sumo.dlr.de/pdf/KraussDiss.pdf.
10. Fahrenkrog, F., Hammouda, M., Fischer, F., and Maier, L. (2023, January 3–6). Virtual Simulation Based Assessment of ADAS in Consumer Tests by openPASS. Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Yokohama, Japan.
11. Eisemann, L., Fehling–Kaschek, M., Gommel, H., Hermann, D., Klemp, M., Lauer, M., Lickert, B., Luettner, F., Moss, R., and Neis, N. (2003, January 24–28). An approach to systematic data acquisition and data-driven simulation for the safety testing of automated driving functions. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Bilbao, Spain.
10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10422676 ↗12. Eisemann, L., Fehling-Kaschek, M., Forkert, S., Forster, A., Gommel, H., Guenther, S., Hammer, S., Hermann, D., Klemp, M., and Lickert, B. (2024, January 22–24). A Joint Approach Towards Data-Driven Virtual Testing for Automated Driving: The AVEAS Project. Proceedings of the Fast-Zero’23, Full Online Conference: Program & Proceedings, Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, Inc. (JSAE), Online.
13. Bindzar, P., Saderova, J., Sofranko, M., Kacmary, P., Brodny, J., and Tutak, M. (2021). A Case Study: Simulation Traffic Model as a Tool to Assess One-Way vs. Two-Way Traffic on Urban Roads around the City Center. Appl. Sci., 11.
10.3390/app11115018 ↗14. Liu, G., Liang, X., Yu, H., Lu, Z., Kang, K., Li, T., and Liu, B. (2021, January 22–24). Video Moving Object Detection Technology Based on Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 2021 China Automation Congress (CAC), IEEE, Beijing, China.
15. Analysis of deep learning frameworks for object detection in motion
16. Barbu, T., Bejinariu, S.-I., and Luca, R. (2024, January 27–28). Transfer Learning-based Framework for Automatic Vehicle Detection, Recognition and Tracking. Proceedings of the 2024 16th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), IEEE, Iasi, Romania.
10.1109/ECAI61503.2024.10607565 ↗19. Guan, F., Xu, H., and Tian, Y. (2023). Evaluation of roadside LiDAR-based and vision-based multi-model all-traffic trajectory data. Sensors, 23.
10.3390/s23125377 ↗20. Reiterer, A., Wäschle, K., Störk, D., Leydecker, A., and Gitzen, N. (2020). Fully Automated Segmentation of 2D and 3D Mobile Mapping Data for Reliable Modeling of Surface Structures Using Deep Learning. Remote Sens., 12.
10.3390/rs12162530 ↗21. Comparing Measured Driver Behavior Distributions to Results from Car-Following Models using SUMO and Real-World Vehicle Trajectories from Radar: SUMO Default vs. Radar-Measured CF model Parameters
10.52825/scp.v4i.214 ↗22. Lobo, S.C., Neumeier, S., Fernandez, E.M.G., and Facchi, C. (2020). InTAS–The Ingolstadt Traffic Scenario for SUMO. arXiv.
23. Ronaldo, A., and Ismail, T. (2024, November 13). Comparison of the Two Micro-Simulation Software Aimsun & Sumo for Highway Traffic Modelling. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:555913/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
25. Dobberstein, J., and The Eclipse Working Group openPASS (2017, January 5–8). An open source approach to safety impact assessment via simulation. Proceedings of the ESV 2017 Organizing Committee: 25th ESV Conference Proceedings, 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Detroit, MI, USA. Available online: https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/25/25ESV-000094.pdf.
26. Bagschik, G., Menzel, T., Reschka, A., and Maurer, M. (2017, January 29–31). Szenarien für Entwicklung, Absicherung und Test von automatisierten Fahrzeugen. Proceedings of the Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme und Automatisiertes Fahren, Walting, Germany.
27. Dupuis, M., Strobl, M., and Grezlikowski, H. (2010, January 9–10). OpenDRIVE 2010 and Beyond-Status and Future of the de facto Standard for the Description of Road Networks. Proceedings of the Trends in Driving Simulation Design and Experiments, Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conférence EUROPE: 2010 Arts et méRiers pars Tech, Institut national de recherche sur les transports et leur sécurité—INRETS, Bron (Rhône), Paris, France. Available online: https://www.ifsttar.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/editions/inrets/Actes/Actes_INRETS_A126.pdf#page=233.
28. Amid, G., and OpenSCENARIO Concept Project (2014, November 13). Association for Standardization of Automation and Measuring Systems (ASAM). Available online: https://www.asam.net/project-detail/openscenario-concept-project/.
29. LEICA Geosystems AG (2018). Leica RTC360 3D Reality Capture Solution, LEICA Geosystems AG.
30. (2024, November 13). Available online: https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d9/dab/tutorial_homography.html.
31. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.C. (2018, January 18–23). Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗32. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. (2009, January 20–25). ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Miami, FL, USA.
10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 ↗33. Kombination von taktischen und strategischen Einflüssen in einer mikroskopischen Verkehrsflusssimulation
34. Hoffmann, S. (2019). Mikroskopische Modellierung und Bewertung von Verkehrssicherheitskritischen Situationen, Technische Universität München.