journal article·2024-11-08Open access

External Validation of Accelerometry-Based Mechanical Loading Prediction Equations

Lucas Veras, Daniela Oliveira, Florêncio Diniz-Sousa, Giorjines Boppre, Ana Resende-Coelho, José Oliveira, Hélder Fonseca

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 22

Abstract

Accurately predicting physical activity-associated mechanical loading is crucial for developing and monitoring exercise interventions that improve bone health. While accelerometer-based prediction equations offer a promising solution, their external validity across different populations and activity contexts remains unclear. This study aimed to validate existing mechanical loading prediction equations by applying them to a sample and testing conditions distinct from the original validation studies. A convenience sample of 49 adults performed walking, running, and jumping activities on a force plate while wearing accelerometers at their hip, lower back, and ankle. Peak ground reaction force (pGRF) and peak loading rate (pLR) predictions were assessed for accuracy. Substantial variability in prediction accuracy was found, with pLR showing the highest errors. These findings highlight the need to improve prediction models to account for individual biomechanical differences, sensor placement, and high-impact activities. Such refinements are essential for ensuring the models’ reliability in real-world applications, particularly in clinical and biomechanical research contexts, where accurate assessments of mechanical loading are critical for designing rehabilitation programs, injury prevention strategies, and optimizing bone health interventions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Center in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal

Funding

Fundação Para a Ciência e Tecnologia · Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health · FCT

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Strong, steady and straight: UK consensus statement on physical activity and exercise for osteoporosis10.1136/bjsports-2021-104634 ↗
2. Exercise and bone health across the lifespan10.1007/s10522-017-9732-6 ↗
3. Exercise and Sports Science Australia (ESSA) position statement on exercise prescription for the prevention and management of osteoporosis10.1016/j.jsams.2016.10.001 ↗
4. Bone quality: The determinants of bone strength and fragility10.1007/s40279-013-0100-7 ↗
5. Harding, A.T., and Beck, B.R. (2017). Exercise, Osteoporosis, and Bone Geometry. Sports, 5.10.3390/sports5020029 ↗
6. (2001). NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis and T. Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 285, 785–795.10.1001/jama.285.6.785 ↗
7. Mechanisms by which exercise improves bone strength10.1007/BF03026318 ↗
8. Mechanical signaling for bone modeling and remodeling10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i4.50 ↗
9. The roles of exercise in bone remodeling and in prevention and treatment of osteoporosis10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.11.005 ↗
10. Measurement and Evaluation of Bone Loading in Physical Activity: A Systematic Review10.1080/1091367X.2020.1855590 ↗
11. Medved, V. (2000). Measurement of Human Locomotion, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420036985 ↗
12. The BPAQ: A bone-specific physical activity assessment instrument10.1007/s00198-008-0606-2 ↗
13. Quantifying bone-relevant activity and its relation to bone strength in girls10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181eeb2f2 ↗
14. Kim, S., So, W.-Y., Kim, J., and Sung, D.J. (2016). Relationship between bone-specific physical activity scores and measures for body composition and bone mineral density in healthy young college women. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0162127 ↗
15. Association between bone-specific physical activity scores and pQCT-derived measures of bone strength and geometry in healthy young and middle-aged premenopausal women10.1007/s11657-018-0495-8 ↗
16. Neugebauer, J.M., Hawkins, D.A., and Beckett, L. (2012). Estimating youth locomotion ground reaction forces using an accelerometer-based activity monitor. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0048182 ↗
17. Neugebauer, J.M., Collins, K.H., and Hawkins, D.A. (2014). Ground reaction force estimates from ActiGraph GT3X+ hip accelerations. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0099023 ↗
18. Predicting ground reaction force from a hip-borne accelerometer during load carriage10.1249/MSS.0000000000001686 ↗
19. Accelerometer-based prediction of skeletal mechanical loading during walking in normal weight to severely obese subjects10.1007/s00198-020-05295-2 ↗
20. Mechanical loading prediction through accelerometry data during walking and running10.1080/17461391.2022.2102437 ↗
21. Veras, L., Diniz-Sousa, F., Boppre, G., Devezas, V., Santos-Sousa, H., Preto, J., Vilas-Boas, J.P., Machado, L., Oliveira, J., and Fonseca, H. (2023). Using Raw Accelerometer Data to Predict High-Impact Mechanical Loading. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23042246 ↗
22. Accelerometer data collection and processing criteria to assess physical activity and other outcomes: A systematic review and practical considerations10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0 ↗
23. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546 ↗
24. Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors10.1249/01.mss.0000185660.38335.de ↗
25. Age and gender differences in the control of vertical ground reaction force by the hip, knee and ankle joints10.1589/jpts.27.1833 ↗
26. Patoz, A., Menéndez, A.F., and Malatesta, D. (2023). The effect of severe obesity on three-dimensional ground reaction force signals during walking. Clin. Biomech., 107.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106042 ↗
27. Statistical considerations in the analysis of accelerometry-based activity monitor data10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399e0f ↗
28. External Validation and Further Exploration of Fall Prediction Models Based on Questionnaires and Daily-Life Trunk Accelerometry10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105107 ↗
29. A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations10.1007/s00421-010-1639-8 ↗
30. Associations between objectively-measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with bone mineral density in adults and older adults, the NHANES study10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.009 ↗
31. A small amount of precisely measured high-intensity habitual physical activity predicts bone heath in pre- and post-menopausal women in UK Biobank10.1093/ije/dyx080 ↗
32. Assessment of gait kinetics using tri-axial accelerometers10.1123/jab.2014-0037 ↗
33. Tan, T., Chiasson, D.P., Hu, H., and Shull, P.B. (2019). Influence of IMU position and orientation placement errors on ground reaction force estimation. J. Biomech., 97.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109416 ↗
34. Characterising and minimising sources of error in inertial body sensor networks10.1504/IJAACS.2013.054828 ↗
35. Jiang, X., Bíró, I., Sárosi, J., Fang, Y., and Gu, Y. (2024). Comparison of ground reaction forces as running speed increases between male and female runners. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.10.3389/fbioe.2024.1378284 ↗
36. Park, J., and Kim, C. (2022). Ground-reaction-force-based gait analysis and its application to gait disorder assessment: New indices for quantifying walking behavior. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22197558 ↗
37. The effect of sensor placement on measured distal tibial accelerations during running10.1123/jab.2022-0249 ↗