journal article·2024-11-12Open access

Inclusion of Muscle Forces Affects Finite Element Prediction of Compression Screw Pullout but Not Fatigue Failure in a Custom Pelvic Implant

Yuhui Zhu, Ata Babazadeh-Naseri, Matthew R. W. Brake, John E. Akin, Geng Li, Valerae O. Lewis, Benjamin J. Fregly

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 22

Abstract

Custom implants used for pelvic reconstruction in pelvic sarcoma surgery face a high complication rate due to mechanical failures of fixation screws. Consequently, patient-specific finite element (FE) models have been employed to analyze custom pelvic implant durability. However, muscle forces have often been omitted from FE studies of the post-operative pelvis with a custom implant, despite the lack of evidence that this omission has minimal impact on predicted bone, implant, and fixation screw stress distributions. This study investigated the influence of muscle forces on FE predictions of fixation screw pullout and fatigue failure in a custom pelvic implant. Specifically, FE analyses were conducted using a patient-specific FE model loaded with seven sets of personalized muscle and hip joint contact force loading conditions estimated using a personalized neuromusculoskeletal (NMS) model. Predictions of fixation screw pullout and fatigue failure—quantified by simulated screw axial forces and von Mises stresses, respectively—were compared between analyses with and without personalized muscle forces. The study found that muscle forces had a considerable influence on predicted screw pullout but not fatigue failure. However, it remains unclear whether including or excluding muscle forces would yield more conservative predictions of screw failures. Furthermore, while the effect of muscle forces on predicted screw failures was location-dependent for cortical screws, no clear location dependency was observed for cancellous screws. These findings support the combined use of patient-specific FE and NMS models, including loading from muscle forces, when predicting screw pullout but not fatigue failure in custom pelvic implants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Hip and Femur Fractures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA

Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT)

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Reconstruction after internal hemipelvectomy: Outcomes and reconstructive algorithm10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829778e1 ↗
2. Clinical effectiveness of hemipelvic reconstruction using computer-aided custom prostheses after resection of malignant pelvic tumors10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.018 ↗
3. Puchner, S.E., Funovics, P.T., Böhler, C., Kaider, A., Stihsen, C., Hobusch, G.M., Panotopoulos, J., and Windhager, R. (2017). Oncological and surgical outcome after treatment of pelvic sarcomas. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0172203 ↗
4. Implantation of hemipelvic prosthesis after resection of sarcoma10.1097/00003086-200203000-00030 ↗
5. Custom designed and 3d-printed titanium pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction after tumour resection10.1177/11207000221135068 ↗
6. Finite element analysis of screw fixation durability under multiple boundary and loading conditions for a custom pelvic implant10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103930 ↗
7. Internal hemipelvectomy with reconstruction for primary pelvic neoplasm: A systematic review: Hemipelvectomy reconstruction: Review10.1111/ans.12895 ↗
8. 3d-printed modular hemipelvic endoprosthetic reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection: Early results of 80 consecutive cases10.2106/JBJS.19.01437 ↗
9. Modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction–experience in 100 patients with mid-term follow-up results10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.002 ↗
10. Zhu, Y., Babazadeh-Naseri, A., Brake, M.R.W., Akin, J.E., Li, G., Lewis, V.O., and Fregly, B.J. (2024). Evaluation of finite element modeling methods for predicting compression screw failure in a custom pelvic implant. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.10.3389/fbioe.2024.1420870 ↗
11. Finite element analysis of the pelvis after modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction10.1007/s00264-012-1756-6 ↗
12. A novel combined hemipelvic endoprosthesis for peri-acetabular tumours involving sacroiliac joint: A finite element study10.1007/s00264-015-2891-7 ↗
13. Development of finite element model for customized prostheses design for patient with pelvic bone tumor10.1177/0954411917692009 ↗
14. Preclinical strength checking for artificial pelvic prosthesis under multi-activities—A case study10.1007/s42235-019-0121-5 ↗
15. Zhou, R., Xue, H., Wang, J., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, J., Han, Q., and Zhao, X. (2022). Improving the stability of a hemipelvic prosthesis based on bone mineral density screw channel and prosthesis optimization design. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.892385 ↗
16. Maslov, L., Borovkov, A., Maslova, I., Soloviev, D., Zhmaylo, M., and Tarasenko, F. (2021). Finite element analysis of customized acetabular implant and bone after pelvic tumour resection throughout the gait cycle. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14227066 ↗
17. Soloviev, D., Maslov, L., and Zhmaylo, M. (2023). Acetabular implant finite element simulation with customised estimate of bone properties. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16010398 ↗
18. Guo, Z., Peng, Y., Shen, Q., Li, J., He, P., Yuan, P., Liu, Y., Que, Y., Guo, W., and Hu, Y. (2023). Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036882 ↗
19. Finite element analysis of the pelvis after customized prosthesis reconstruction10.1007/s42235-018-0035-7 ↗
20. Park, D.W., Lim, A., Park, J.W., Lim, K.M., and Kang, H.G. (2019). Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation type in 3d-printed periacetabular implants using a finite element simulation. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9050820 ↗
21. A general multi-objective topology optimization methodology developed for customized design of pelvic prostheses10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.06.008 ↗
22. Load transfer across the pelvic bone10.1016/0021-9290(94)00125-N ↗
23. Finite element modelling of the pelvis: Inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.08.010 ↗
24. Li, G., Ao, D., Vega, M.M., Shourijeh, M.S., Zandiyeh, P., Chang, S.-H., Lewis, V.O., Dunbar, N.J., Babazadeh-Naseri, A., and Baines, A.J. (2022). A computational method for estimating trunk muscle activations during gait using lower extremity muscle synergies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.964359 ↗
25. Vega, M.M., Li, G., Shourijeh, M.S., Ao, D., Weinschenk, R.C., Patten, C., Font-Llagunes, J.M., Lewis, V.O., and Fregly, B.J. (2022). Computational evaluation of psoas muscle influence on walking function following internal hemipelvectomy with reconstruction. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.855870 ↗
26. OpenSim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement10.1109/TBME.2007.901024 ↗
27. Seth, A., Hicks, J.L., Uchida, T.K., Habib, A., Dembia, C.L., Dunne, J.J., Ong, C.F., DeMers, M.S., Rajagopal, A., and Millard, M. (2018). OpenSim: Simulating Musculoskeletal Dynamics and Neuromuscular Control to Study Human and Animal Movement. PLoS Comput. Biol., 14.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006223 ↗
28. Ao, D., Vega, M.M., Shourijeh, M.S., Patten, C., and Fregly, B.J. (2022). EMG-driven musculoskeletal model calibration with estimation of unmeasured muscle excitations via synergy extrapolation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.962959 ↗
29. Niinomi, M., Narushima, T., and Nakai, M. (2015). Titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Advances in Metallic Biomaterials: Tissues, Materials and Biological Reactions, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-46836-4 ↗
30. Computational modelling of polyethylene wear and creep in total hip joint replacements: Effect of the bearing clearance and diameter10.1177/1350650112441908 ↗
31. Clinical implementation of finite element models in pelvic ring surgery for prediction of implant behavior: A case report10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.06.009 ↗
32. Eggermont, F., Verdonschot, N., van der Linden, Y., and Tanck, E. (2019). Calibration with or without phantom for fracture risk prediction in cancer patients with femoral bone metastases using CT-based finite element models. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0220564 ↗
33. Heterogeneous material mapping methods for patient-specific finite element models of pelvic trabecular bone: A convergence study10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.07.012 ↗
34. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: Development, validation and sensitivity studies10.1115/1.1894148 ↗
35. Three-dimensional finite element models of the human pubic symphysis with viscohyperelastic soft tissues10.1007/s10439-006-9145-1 ↗
36. Hao, Z., Wan, C., Gao, X., and Ji, T. (2011). The effect of boundary condition on the biomechanics of a human pelvic joint under an axial compressive load: A three-dimensional finite element model. J. Biomech. Eng., 133.10.1115/1.4005223 ↗
37. The effect of boundary constraints on finite element modelling of the human pelvis10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.02.001 ↗
38. Realistic loads for testing hip implants10.3233/BME-2010-0616 ↗
39. Kian, A., Pizzolato, C., Halaki, M., Ginn, K., Lloyd, D., Reed, D., and Ackland, D. (2019). Static optimization underestimates antagonist muscle activity at the glenohumeral joint: A musculoskeletal modeling study. J. Biomech., 97.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109348 ↗
40. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9 ↗