Cross-Layer Routing Protocol Based on Channel Quality for Underwater Acoustic Communication Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the physical characteristics of acoustic channels, the performance of underwater acoustic communication networks (UACNs) is more susceptible to the impacts of multipath and Doppler effects. Channel quality can serve as a measure of the reliability of underwater communication links. A cross-layer routing protocol based on channel quality (CLCQ) is proposed to improve the overall network performance and resource utilization. First, the BELLHOP ray model is used to calculate the channel impulse response combined with the winter sound speed profile data of a specific sea area. Then, the channel impulse response is integrated into the communication system to evaluate the channel quality between nodes based on the bit error rate (BER). Finally, during the selection of the next hop node, a reinforcement learning algorithm is employed to facilitate cross-layer interaction within the protocol stack. The optimal relay node is determined by the channel quality index (BER) from the physical layer, the buffer state from the data link layer, and the node residual energy. To enhance the algorithm’s convergence speed, a forwarding candidate set selection method is proposed which takes into account node depth, residual energy, and buffer state. Simulation results show that the packet delivery rate (PDR) of the CLCQ is significantly higher than that of Q-Learning-Based Energy-Efficient and Lifetime-Extended Adaptive Routing (QELAR) and Geographic and Opportunistic Routing (GEDAR).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Underwater Acoustic Signal Processing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent Advances and Future Directions on Underwater Wireless Communications10.1007/s11831-019-09354-8 ↗
2. Xiao, X., Huang, H., and Wang, W. (2021). Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: An Energy-Efficient Clustering Routing Protocol Based on Data Fusion and Genetic Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010312 ↗
3. Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks: Research Challenges10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.004 ↗
4. A Survey on Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks10.1016/j.adhoc.2003.09.010 ↗
5. Challenges and Opportunities of Underwater Cognitive Acoustic Networks10.1109/TETC.2014.2310457 ↗
6. Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review of Recent Issues and Challenges10.1155/2019/6470359 ↗
7. Congestion Control Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey10.1016/j.jnca.2015.03.002 ↗
8. Emokpae, L.E., Liu, Z., Edelmann, G.F., and Younis, M. (2018, January 28–30). A Cross-Stack QoS Routing Approach For Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 Fourth Underwater Communications and Networking Conference (UComms), Lerici, Italy.10.1109/UComms.2018.8493217 ↗
9. Liu, J., Yu, M., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Wei, X., and Cui, J. (2018). RECRP: An Underwater Reliable Energy-Efficient Cross-Layer Routing Protocol. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18124148 ↗
10. HCAR: A Hybrid-Coding-Aware Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks10.1109/JIOT.2023.3240827 ↗
11. A Multimedia Cross-Layer Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks10.1109/TWC.2010.062910.100137 ↗
12. Wang, B., Zhang, H., Zhu, Y., Cai, B., and Guo, X. (2023). Adaptive Power-Controlled Depth-Based Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11081567 ↗
13. A Power Control-Aided Q-Learning-Based Routing Protocol for Optical-Acoustic Hybrid Underwater Sensor Networks10.1109/TGCN.2023.3270867 ↗
14. Xu, H., and Yuan, X. (2023). Cross-Layer Design for Energy-Efficient Reliable Multi-Path Transmission in Event-Driven Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23146520 ↗
15. RCAR: A Reinforcement-Learning-Based Routing Protocol for Congestion-Avoided Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks10.1109/JSEN.2019.2932126 ↗
16. Ali, R., Sohail, M., Almagrabi, A.O., Musaddiq, A., and Kim, B.-S. (2020). greenMAC Protocol: A Q-Learning-Based Mechanism to Enhance Channel Reliability for WLAN Energy Savings. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9101720 ↗
17. An Efficient Geo-Routing-Aware MAC Protocol Based on OFDM for Underwater Acoustic Networks10.1109/JIOT.2023.3235422 ↗
18. Li, N., Martínez, J.-F., Meneses Chaus, J.M., and Eckert, M. (2016). A Survey on Underwater Acoustic Sensor Network Routing Protocols. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16030414 ↗
19. Shovon, I.I., and Shin, S. (2022). Survey on Multi-Path Routing Protocols of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: Advancement and Applications. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11213467 ↗
20. Boavida, F., Plagemann, T., Stiller, B., Westphal, C., and Monteiro, E. (2006). VBF: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the NETWORKING 2006. Networking Technologies, Services, and Protocols; Performance of Computer and Communication Networks; Mobile and Wireless Communications Systems, Springer.
21. Nicolaou, N., See, A., Xie, P., Cui, J.-H., and Maggiorini, D. (2007, January 18–21). Improving the Robustness of Location-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2007–Europe, Aberdeen, Scotland.10.1109/OCEANSE.2007.4302470 ↗
22. Void Avoidance in Three-Dimensional Mobile Underwater Sensor Networks10.1007/978-3-642-03417-6_30 ↗
23. QELAR: A Machine-Learning-Based Adaptive Routing Protocol for Energy-Efficient and Lifetime-Extended Underwater Sensor Networks10.1109/TMC.2010.28 ↗
24. A Survey of Routing Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks10.1109/COMST.2020.3048190 ↗
25. GEDAR: Geographic and Opportunistic Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks10.1109/TC.2015.2423677 ↗
26. Multi-Objective Routing Optimization to Support IoUT Applications in UWSNs10.1109/JIOT.2024.3399783 ↗
27. CLORP: Cross-Layer Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks Based on Multiagent Reinforcement Learning10.1109/JSEN.2024.3383035 ↗
28. Sun, Y., Ge, W., Li, Y., and Yin, J. (2023). Cross-Layer Protocol Based on Directional Reception in Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11030666 ↗
29. Underwater Acoustic Networks10.1109/48.820738 ↗
30. Q-Learning10.1007/BF00992698 ↗
31. A Gentle Introduction to Reinforcement Learning and Its Application in Different Fields10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038605 ↗
32. Molins, M., and Stojanovic, M. (2006, January 16–19). Slotted FAMA: A MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2006–Asia Pacific, Singapore.10.1109/OCEANSAP.2006.4393832 ↗