Differential Relapse of Proximal and Distal Segments after Mandibular Setback Surgery
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the differential positional changes of the proximal and distal segments during mandibular setback surgery relapse. Thirty patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were included. Skull models from pretreatment, postsurgery, and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography were superimposed to evaluate condylar displacement and rotational changes, and to determine the center of rotation (CRot) in the proximal and distal segments. During postsurgical relapse, the proximal segment rotated 2.4 ± 2.1° counterclockwise, with the CRot located near the mandibular condyle. The distal segment rotated 2.0 ± 2.3° counterclockwise, resulting in forward and upward movement of the chin. The displaced condyle partially returned to its original position during postsurgical orthodontic treatment. A vertical bony step (VBS) between the proximal and distal segments commonly occurs during mandibular setback surgery. As the VBS increases, the CRot of the distal segment shifts posterosuperiorly, following a predictable pattern outlined by regression equations. These findings suggest that relapse after mandibular setback surgery consistently occurs in an anterosuperior direction, with translatory movement becoming more prominent as the VBS increases. Including these regression equations in presurgical planning can enhance the precision of relapse simulations and help clinicians more accurately anticipate postsurgical relapse.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Gwangju 61453, Republic of Korea
Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA
Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 54913, Republic of Korea
Funding
Chosun University
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Postsurgical Stability After Mandibular Setback Surgery with Minimal Orthodontic Preparation Following Upper Premolar Extraction10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.004 ↗
2. Stability of Mandibular Setback Surgery with and Without Presurgical Orthodontics10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.033 ↗
3. Comparison of Progressive Cephalometric Changes and Postsurgical Stability of Skeletal Class III Correction with and without Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.022 ↗
4. The Direction of Double-Jaw Surgery Relapse for Correction of Skeletal Class III Deformity: Bilateral Sagittal Split Versus Intraoral Vertical Ramus Setback Osteotomies10.1007/s12663-018-1127-y ↗
5. Evaluation of Post-Surgical Relapse after Mandibular Setback Surgery with Minimal Orthodontic Preparation
6. Postsurgical Relapse in Class III Patients Treated with Two-Jaw Surgery: Conventional Three-Stage Method Versus Surgery-First Approach10.1097/SCS.0000000000001989 ↗
7. Stability After Mandibular Setback: Mandible-Only Versus 2-Jaw Surgery10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.006 ↗
8. Long-Term Stability of Surgical Mandibular Setback10.2319/052306-209.1 ↗
9. The Hierarchy of Stability and Predictability in Orthognathic Surgery with Rigid Fixation: An Update and Extension10.1186/1746-160X-3-21 ↗
10. Cause of Early Skeletal Relapse after Mandibular Setback10.1016/0889-5406(89)90132-7 ↗
11. A Retrospective Analysis of the Stability and Relapse of Soft and Hard Tissue Change after Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback of 64 Taiwanese Patients10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.228 ↗
12. Skeletal Stability After Simultaneous Mandibular Angle Resection and Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy for Correction of Mandible Prognathism10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.064 ↗
13. Comparative Study of Skeletal Stability between Bicortical Resorbable and Titanium Screw Fixation after Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Prognathism
14. Change in Condylar Position in Posterior Bending Osteotomy Minimizing Condylar Torque in BSSRO for Facial Asymmetry10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.021 ↗
15. Condylar Positioning Devices for Orthognathic Surgery: A Literature Review10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.11.027 ↗
16. Changes in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction after Orthognathic Surgery10.1053/joms.2003.50131 ↗
17. Vertical Bony Step between Proximal and Distal Segments after Mandibular Setback Is Related with Relapse: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Study10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.10.016 ↗
18. Contributing Factors to Intraoperative Clockwise Rotation of the Proximal Segment as a Relapse Factor after Mandibular Setback with Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.034 ↗
19. Orthodontic Treatment with Isolated Mandibular Setback Surgery: Use of 3D Surgical Simulation including Postsurgical Relapse of Mandibular Setback10.33777/cjkao.2022.12.1.36 ↗
20. Three-Dimensional Mandibular Characteristics in Skeletal Malocclusion: A Cross-Sectional Study10.1007/s00056-022-00419-1 ↗
21. Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of Mandibular Morphology in Patients with Facial Asymmetry and Mandibular Prognathism
22. Long-Term Stability and Condylar Remodeling after Mandibular Advancement: A 5-Year Follow-Up
23. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Positional Change of the Condyle after Mandibular Setback by Means of Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy10.1067/moe.2002.126452 ↗
24. Condylar Head Remodeling Compensating for Condylar Head Displacement by Orthognathic Surgery10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.029 ↗
25. Evaluation of Mandibular Condyle Position in Class III Patients after Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study10.4041/kjod23.188 ↗
26. Positional Change in Mandibular Condyle in Facial Asymmetric Patients after Orthognathic Surgery: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study10.1186/s40902-018-0152-6 ↗
27. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Distal and Proximal Segment Skeletal Relapse Following Isolated Mandibular Advancement Surgery in 100 Consecutive Patients: A One-Year Follow-up Study10.1016/j.ijom.2021.03.020 ↗
28. Stability of Single-Jaw vs Two-Jaw Surgery Following the Correction of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/ocr.12456 ↗
29. Comparative Study of Mandibular Stability after Sagittal Split Osteotomies: Biocortical versus Monocortical Osteosynthesis10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0551_csomsa_2.0.co_2 ↗
30. Malocclusions Resulting from Loss of Fixation after Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.022 ↗