Research on a Strategy for Prediction Methods of Submarine Self-Propulsion Hydrodynamic Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
To investigate the impact of different computational strategies on the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of a submarine model, a study was conducted using the RANS method, employing both the steady-state Moving Reference Frame (MRF) method and the unsteady Rigid Body Motion (RBM) method. Numerical simulations of the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of the submarine model were performed under different computational strategies, including submarine with propeller, submarine first and propeller second, and propeller rotational speed iteration. The differences between these strategies were analyzed from various perspectives, such as submarine resistance, propeller hydrodynamic performance, total solver actual runtime, propeller unsteady bearing forces, and induced fluctuating pressure. The results indicated that when conducting numerical simulations of the self-propulsion hydrodynamic performance of the submarine with a propeller, the fluctuation ranges of the submarine resistance, propeller thrust, and torque obtained by the steady MRF method were within 0.1% to 0.8%, compared with the three strategies in the unsteady state. In terms of computational efficiency, strategy 3 (RBM—submarine with a propeller) had the lowest computational efficiency, and the time to obtain a self-propulsion curve was 11.9 times, 4.4 times, and 3.1 times that of strategy 1 (MRF + RBM—submarine with a propeller), strategy 2 (RBM—submarine first, then propeller), and strategy 4 (RBM—propeller rotational speed iteration). When analyzing the propeller excitation forces under the submarine’s self-propulsion state using the steady-state MRF method combined with the unsteady RBM method, the frequency domain peak fluctuations were within 5% compared with the three strategies in the unsteady state, making this method suitable for numerical simulations of propeller excitation forces. These findings provide methodological support for evaluating the performance of the submarine’s hydrodynamic propulsion system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability · Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps · Rocket and propulsion systems research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China · Jiangsu Province Graduate Practice Innovation Program · The National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. (2024, October 01). InfoVISUAL.info. Available online: https://bdumas.fr/AURIOL/AIDES/THEME-Transports/PLANCHE%20TRANSPORT-Format%20HTML/www.infovisual.info/05/063_en.html.
2. Near-field flow of submarines and ships advancing in a stable stratified fluid10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.06.038 ↗
3. Experimental and numerical study of a submarine and propeller behaviors in submergence and surface conditions10.29252/jafm.11.05.28693 ↗
4. Near-surface self propulsion of a generic submarine in calm water and waves10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.082 ↗
5. Zhang, S.D., Li, H.W., Zhang, T.D., Pang, Y.J., and Chen, Q.L. (2019). Numerical simulation study on the effects of course keeping on the roll stability of submarine emergency rising. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9163285 ↗
6. Practical 6-DoF manoeuvring simulation of a BB2 submarine near the free surface10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119334 ↗
7. Overset simulation of a submarine and propeller in towed, self-propulsion and maneuvering conditions
8. Submarine propeller computations and application to self-propulsion of DARPA SUBOFF10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.029 ↗
9. Resistance and self-propulsion simulations for the DARPA suboff submarine by using RANS method10.6112/kscfe.2018.23.3.036 ↗
10. Large-Eddy Simulations of a notional submarine in towed and self-propelled configurations10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.01.013 ↗
11. Experiments and CFD for the propeller wake of a generic submarine operating near the surface10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107304 ↗
12. A DES-based study of the flow around the self-propelled DARPA Suboff working in deep immersion and beneath the free-surface10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110358 ↗
13. Experimental and numerical investigation of DARPA suboff submarine propelled with INSEAN E1619 propeller for self-propulsion10.5957/JOSR.09180084 ↗
14. The study about the impact of the free-surface on the performance of the propeller attached at the stern of a submarine
15. Numerical prediction approach for hydrodynamic force and noise of propeller in submarine propeller interaction condition
16. Numerical calculation method of submarine propeller self-propulsion based on multi-domain stitching grid technique
17. Rao, Z.Q., Zhang, H.Q., Yang, C.J., and Li, W. (2013, January 13–15). Numerical simulation of submarine self-propulsion factor. Proceedings of the 2013 Academic Conference on Ship Hydrodynamics, Xi’an, China. (In Chinese).
18. Yang, Q. (2013). Numerical Analysis of Non-BOR Submarine Resistance and Propulsion Performance. [Master’s Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology]. (In Chinese).
19. Investigation of self-propulsion of DARPA suboff by RANS method10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.051 ↗
20. An investigation of scale effects on the self-propulsion characteristics of a submarine10.1016/j.apor.2021.102728 ↗
21. Influence of wake field on propeller exciting force of submarine
22. On self-propulsion assessment of marine vehicles10.21278/brod69403 ↗
23. Hydrodynamic characteristics of self-propulsion submarine navigation below the ice sheet with continuous ice ridge
24. Chen, W.T. (2023). Research on Hydrodynamics and Wake Characteristics of Submarines Navigating Near Surface. [Master’s Thesis, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology]. (In Chinese).
25. BOOK REVIEW: Turbulent Flows10.1088/0957-0233/12/11/705 ↗
26. Toward approximating non-local dynamics in single-point pressure-strain correlation closures10.1017/jfm.2016.730 ↗
27. Heyse, J.F., Mishra, A.A., and Iaccarino, G. (2021). Estimating RANS model uncertainty using machine learning. J. Glob. Power Propuls. Soc., 1–14.10.33737/jgpps/134643 ↗
28. Sagaut, P. (2006). Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, Springer.
29. Menter, F.R. (1993). Zonal Two Equation k-ω Turbulence Models For Aerodynamic Flows. 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers, the American institute of Aeronauties and Astronautics. AIAA-93–2906.10.2514/6.1993-2906 ↗
30. Liu, H.L., and Huang, T.T. (1999). Summary of DARPA Suboff Experimental Program Data, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD).10.21236/ADA359226 ↗
31. ITTC (September, January 28). Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. Proceedings of the 26th International Towing Tank Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
32. Discussion: Criticisms of the “correction factor” verification method10.1115/1.1780171 ↗
33. Numerical analysis of a propeller during heave motion in cavitating flow10.1016/j.apor.2017.05.001 ↗
34. The hydrodynamic characteristics of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles in rotating flow fields
35. Li, Y.K. (2020). Fluid Structure Interaction Simulation and Hydrodynamic Noise Prediction of the System-Wide Underwater Vehicle. [Master’s Thesis, Dalian University of Technology]. (In Chinese).