Sensitivity Analysis of Fatigue Life for Cracked Carbon-Fiber Structures Based on Surrogate Sampling and Kriging Model under Distribution Parameter Uncertainty
Source abstract
Abstract
The quality and reliability of wind turbine blades, as core components of wind turbines, are crucial for the operational safety of the entire system. Carbon fiber is the primary material for wind turbine blades. However, during the manufacturing process, manual intervention inevitably introduces minor defects, which can lead to crack propagation under complex working conditions. Due to limited understanding and measurement capabilities of the input variables of structural systems, the distribution parameters of these variables often exhibit uncertainty. Therefore, it is essential to assess the impact of distribution parameter uncertainty on the fatigue performance of carbon-fiber structures with initial cracks and quickly identify the key distribution parameters affecting their reliability through global sensitivity analysis. This paper proposes a sensitivity analysis method based on surrogate sampling and the Kriging model to address the computational challenges and engineering application difficulties in distribution parameter sensitivity analysis. First, fatigue tests were conducted on carbon-fiber structures with initial cracks to study the dispersion of their fatigue life under different initial crack lengths. Next, based on the Hashin fatigue failure criterion, a simulation analysis method for the fatigue cumulative damage life of cracked carbon-fiber structures was proposed. By introducing uncertainty parameters into the simulation model, a training sample set was obtained, and a Kriging model describing the relationship between distribution parameters and fatigue life was established. Finally, an efficient input variable sampling method using the surrogate sampling probability density function was introduced, and a Sobol sensitivity analysis method based on surrogate sampling and the Kriging model was proposed. The results show that this method significantly reduces the computational burden of distribution parameter sensitivity analysis while ensuring computational accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Funding
GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Optimal reliability, warranty and price for new products10.1080/07408170601091907 ↗
2. Jureczko, M., and Mrówka, M. (2022). Multiobjective optimization of composite wind turbine blade. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15134649 ↗
3. Davis, M., Dejesus, E.N.N., Shekaramiz, M., Zander, J., and Memari, M. (2024). Identification and localization of wind turbine blade faults using deep learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14146319 ↗
4. Reliability analysis of multi-state systems with common cause failures based on Bayesian network and fuzzy probability10.1007/s10479-019-03247-6 ↗
5. Ge, X.Y., Bi, J.X., Ma, H., Wang, Y., Jiao, J.M., and Wang, G.F. (2024). Reliability analysis of wind turbine blades based on numerical analysis and multi-fault competition failure. Advances in Mechanical Design. ICMD 2023. Mechanisms and Machine Science, Springer.10.1007/978-981-97-0922-9_82 ↗
6. Nie, Y., Liu, Q., Xiang, Z., Zhong, S., and Huang, X. (2023). Performance and modification mechanism of recycled glass fiber of wind turbine blades and SBS Composite-Modified asphalt. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13106335 ↗
7. Formation mechanism and detection and evaluation methods as well as repair technology of crack damage in fiber-reinforced composite wind turbine blade: A review10.1007/s00170-022-09230-z ↗
8. A single-loop strategy for time-variant system reliability analysis under multiple failure modes10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107159 ↗
9. A developed failure mode and effect analysis for floating offshore wind turbine support structures10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.033 ↗
10. Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Yan, L., Wen, X., and Wang, H. (2023). Wind Turbine Blade Cracking Detection under Imbalanced Data Using a Novel Roundtrip Auto-Encoder Approach. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132111628 ↗
11. A real-time inspection and opportunistic maintenance strategies for floating offshore wind turbines10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111433 ↗
12. Babba, R., Hebbache, K., Douadi, A., Boutlikht, M., Hammouche, R., Dahmani, S., Del Serrone, G., and Moretti, L. (2024). Impact of silica sand on mechanical properties of epoxy resin composites and their application in CFRP–Concrete bonding. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14156599 ↗
13. A multi phase-field-cohesive zone model for laminated composites: Application to delamination migration10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114471 ↗
14. Dynamic crack propagation in variable stiffness composite laminates under thermal shock10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104325 ↗
15. Failure prediction for high-strain rate and out-of-plane compression of fibrous composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109141 ↗
16. Improvement of boundary effect model in multi-scale hybrid fibers reinforced cementitious composite and prediction of its structural failure behavior10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109219 ↗
17. Al-Fasih, M.Y., Kueh, A.B.H., and Ibrahim, M.H.W. (2020). Failure behavior of sandwich honeycomb composite beam containing crack at the skin. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0227895 ↗
18. Simulation study of crack parameters’ effects on the vibration characteristics of a bladed disk system10.21595/jve.2023.23337 ↗
19. Crack propagation simulation and overload fatigue life prediction via enhanced physics-informed neural networks10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108382 ↗
20. Ferrarese, A., Niutta, C.B., Ciampaglia, A., and Paolino, D.S. (2024). A statistical mesoscale approach to model the size effect on the tensile strength of notched woven composites. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14083467 ↗
21. Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review10.1016/j.ress.2020.107312 ↗
22. Multivariate sensitivity analysis and derivative-based global sensitivity measures with dependent variables10.1016/j.ress.2021.107519 ↗
23. Vectorial surrogate modeling method for multi-objective reliability design10.1016/j.apm.2022.03.033 ↗
24. New learning functions for active learning Kriging reliability analysis using a probabilistic approach: KO and WKO functions10.1007/s00158-023-03627-4 ↗
25. A new sampling approach for system reliability-based design optimization under multiple simulation models10.1016/j.ress.2022.109024 ↗
26. Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines10.1016/j.ress.2022.108777 ↗
27. Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters10.1016/j.ress.2019.106783 ↗
28. A general frame for uncertainty propagation under multimodally distributed random variables10.1016/j.cma.2020.113109 ↗
29. Uncertainty Sensitivity Analysis for Reliability Problems with Parametric Distributions10.1109/TR.2017.2714172 ↗
30. Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty10.1016/j.ress.2016.06.005 ↗
31. Using Well-Understood Single-Objective functions in multiobjective Black-Box optimization test suites10.1162/evco_a_00298 ↗
32. Failure analysis and pin hole profile optimization design of combined piston for marine diesel engine based on Kriging model and NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108505 ↗
33. Structural fatigue reliability analysis based on active learning Kriging model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107639 ↗
34. Time-variant system reliability analysis method for a small failure probability problem10.1016/j.ress.2020.107261 ↗
35. XFEM for semipermeable crack in piezoelectric material with Maxwell stress10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109281 ↗
36. Active learning for structural reliability: Survey, general framework and benchmark10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102174 ↗
37. A new algorithm for importance analysis of the inputs with distribution parameter uncertainty10.1080/00207721.2015.1088099 ↗
38. Thomoglou, A.K., Falara, M.G., Gkountakou, F.I., Elenas, A., and Chalioris, C.E. (2022). Influence of different surfactants on carbon fiber dispersion and the mechanical performance of smart piezoresistive cementitious composites. Fibers, 10.10.3390/fib10060049 ↗
39. Pozegic, T.R., Huntley, S., Longana, M.L., He, S., Bandara, R.I., King, S.G., and Hamerton, I. (2020). Improving dispersion of recycled discontinuous carbon fibres to increase fibre throughput in the HIPERDIF process. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13071544 ↗
40. Reliability analysis of H-section steel columns under blast loading10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.06.001 ↗