journal article·2024-09-13Open access

A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting and Mitigating Pallet Collapse during Transport: The Case of the Glass Industry

Francisco Carvalho, João Manuel R. S. Tavares, Marta Campos Ferreira

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

This study explores the prediction and mitigation of pallet collapse during transportation within the glass packaging industry, employing a machine learning approach to reduce cargo loss and enhance logistics efficiency. Using the CRoss-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) framework, data were systematically collected from a leading glass manufacturer and analysed. A comparative analysis between the Decision Tree and Random Forest machine learning algorithms, evaluated using performance metrics such as F1-score, revealed that the latter is more effective at predicting pallet collapse. This study is pioneering in identifying new critical predictive variables, particularly geometry-related and temperature-related features, which significantly influence the stability of pallets. Based on these findings, several strategies to prevent pallet collapse are proposed, including optimizing pallet stacking patterns, enhancing packaging materials, implementing temperature control measures, and developing more robust handling protocols. These insights demonstrate the utility of machine learning in generating actionable recommendations to optimize supply chain operations and offer a foundation for further academic and practical advancements in cargo handling within the glass industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Tkaczyk, S., Drozd, M., Kędzierski, Ł., and Santarek, K. (2021). Study of the stability of palletized cargo by dynamic test method performed on laboratory test bench. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21155129 ↗
2. Ferreira, G.F.O., and Sergio Dulcini, V.T. (2022, January 14–18). Topological optimization of a pallet motion blocking made of long-fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite. Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Conference on Composite Materials, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
3. Burges, D. (2012). Cargo Theft, Loss Prevention, and Supply Chain Security, Butterworth-Heinemann.10.1016/B978-0-12-416007-1.00013-3 ↗
4. Route optimization in township logistics distribution considering customer satisfaction based on adaptive genetic algorithm10.1016/j.matcom.2022.05.020 ↗
5. The problem of proper cargo securing in road transport—Case study10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.209 ↗
6. The study of project cargo logistics operation: A general overview10.1186/s41072-022-00125-6 ↗
7. Reformation and optimization of cargo handling operation at Indian air cargo terminals10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100022 ↗
8. (2024, August 23). Directive2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the Technical Roadside Inspection of the Roadworthiness of Commercial Vehicles Circulating in the Union and Repealing Directive 2000/30/EC. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/47/oj.
9. Hallak, K., and Abdallah, A. (2024). A Supervised Machine Learning Monitoring System for Vehicle-Railway Bridge Collision. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, University of Lorraine.10.47852/bonviewAIA42022662 ↗
10. MOQEA/D: Multi-Objective QEA with Decomposition Mechanism and Excellent Global Search and Its Application10.1109/TITS.2024.3373510 ↗
11. Hasanvand, M., Nooshyar, M., Moharamkhani, E., and Selyari, A. (2024). Machine Learning Methodology for Identifying Vehicles Using Image Processing. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, University of Lorraine.
12. A study on ice resistance prediction based on deep learning data generation method10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117467 ↗
13. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n160 ↗
14. Classification of Damages of Palletized Loads in Road Transport and Its Impact on Environmental Protection10.54740/ros.2022.032 ↗
15. The data-driven analytics for investigating cargo loss in logistics systems10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2016-0061 ↗
16. A neural network for transportation safety modeling10.1016/0957-4174(95)00002-Q ↗
17. Panchapakesan, A., Abielmona, R., Falcon, R., and Petriu, E. (2018, January 8–11). Prediction of container damage insurance claims for optimized maritime port operations. Proceedings of the Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 31st Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Canadian AI 2018, Toronto, ON, Canada. Proceedings 31.10.1007/978-3-319-89656-4_25 ↗
18. Improving shipping container damage claims prediction through level 4 information fusion
19. Measurement and analysis of truck transport vibration levels and damage to packaged tangerines during transit10.1002/pts.687 ↗
20. Susceptibility of apples to bruising inside ventilated corrugated paperboard packages during simulated transport damage10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.001 ↗
21. Damage to French-Fried Potatoes Caused by Simulated Transport and Handling Tests at Cryogenic Temperatures10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13711.x ↗
22. Road-vehicle-load interactions for transport of fruit and vegetables10.1016/0308-521X(82)90062-2 ↗
23. Verification and application of a model for predicting damage to horticultural produce during transport10.1016/0308-521X(85)90001-0 ↗
24. Recognition method research on rough handling of express parcels based on acceleration features and CNN10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107942 ↗
25. Todisco, M., and Mao, Z. (2022). High-Rate Damage Classification and Lifecycle Prediction viaDeep Learning. Data Science in Engineering, Volume 9, Proceedings of the 39th IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2021, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-76004-5_25 ↗
26. Emenike, C.C., Van Eyk, N.P., and Hoffman, A.J. (2016, January 1–4). Improving cold chain logistics through RFID temperature sensing and predictive modelling. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795932 ↗
27. Yu, W., Ye, W.Z., and Tateno, S. (2017, January 12–15). Real time logistics monitoring system of packages during transportation using decision tree combined with clustering method. Proceedings of the 2017 International Automatic Control Conference (CACS), Pingtung, Taiwan.10.1109/CACS.2017.8284242 ↗
28. Wirth, R., and Hipp, J. (2000, January 11–13). CRISP-DM: Towards a standard process model for data mining. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Manchester, UK.
29. Little, R.J., and Rubin, D.B. (2019). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119482260 ↗
30. Software cost estimation with incomplete data10.1109/32.962560 ↗
31. A review on missing values for main challenges and methods10.1016/j.is.2023.102268 ↗
32. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers10.1177/1094428112470848 ↗
33. An outliers detection and elimination framework in classification task of data mining10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100164 ↗
34. Yu, L., and Liu, H. (2003, January 24–27). Efficiently handling feature redundancy in high-dimensional data. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/956804.956840 ↗
35. Sahebi, G., Movahedi, P., Ebrahimi, M., Pahikkala, T., Plosila, J., and Tenhunen, H. (2020). GeFeS: A generalized wrapper feature selection approach for optimizing classification performance. Comput. Biol. Med., 125.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103974 ↗
36. Kornbrot, D. (2014). Point biserial correlation. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781118445112.stat06227 ↗
37. Application of Chi-square discretization algorithms to ensemble classification methods10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115540 ↗
38. Effective use of Spearman’s and Kendall’s correlation coefficients for association between two measured traits10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.010 ↗
39. Prediction of crude oil prices using support vector regression (SVR) with grid search-Cross validation algorithm
40. Learning from imbalanced data10.1109/TKDE.2008.239 ↗
41. Ahmed, A.M., Rizaner, A., and Ulusoy, A.H. (2018). A novel decision tree classification based on post-pruning with Bayes minimum risk. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0194168 ↗
42. Therneau, T., Atkinson, B., Ripley, B., and Ripley, M.B. (2016, April 20). Package ‘rpart’. Available online: http://cran.ma.ic.ac.uk/web/packages/rpart/rpart.pdf.
43. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
44. RColorBrewer, S., and Liaw, M.A. (2018). Package ‘Randomforest’, University of California.