journal article·2024-09-05Open access

Adam Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression with Combined Kernel-Function-Based Monte Carlo Reliability Analysis of Non-Circular Deep Soft Rock Tunnel

Jiancong Xu, Ziteng Yan, Yongshuai Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

Evaluating the reliability of deep soft rock tunnels is a very important issue to be solved. In this study, we propose a Monte Carlo simulation reliability analysis method (MCS–RAM) integrating the adaptive momentum stochastic optimization algorithm (Adam), Bayesian inference theory and Gaussian process regression (GPR) with combined kernel function, and we developed it in Python. The proposed method used the Latin hypercube sampling method to generate a dataset sample of geo-mechanical parameters, constructed combined kernel functions of GPR and used GPR to establish a surrogate model of the nonlinear mapping relationship between displacements and mechanical parameters of the surrounding rock. Adam was used to optimize the hyperparameters of the surrogate model. The Bayesian inference algorithm was used to obtain the probability distribution of geotechnical parameters and the optimal surrounding rock mechanical parameters. Finally, the failure probability was computed using MCS–RAM based on the optimized surrogate model. Through the application of an engineering case, the results indicate that the proposed method has fewer prediction errors and stronger prediction ability than Kriging or XGBoost, and it can significantly save computational time compared with the traditional polynomial response surface method. The proposed method can be used in the reliability analysis of all shapes of tunnels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Risk and Safety Analysis · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. An efficient reliability method combining adaptive support vector machine and Monte Carlo Simulation10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.04.006 ↗
2. Reliability–based multi–objective optimization in tunneling alignment under uncertainty10.1007/s00158-021-02846-x ↗
3. Reliability analysis of face stability for tunnel excavation in a dependent system10.1016/j.ress.2020.107306 ↗
4. Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities10.1016/j.ress.2021.107530 ↗
5. Flexible–constrained time–variant hybrid reliability–based design optimization10.1007/s00158-023-03550-8 ↗
6. Reliability analysis of tunnels using an adaptive RBF and a first–order reliability method10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.02.011 ↗
7. Hybrid reliability analysis framework for reliability analysis of tunnels10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000759 ↗
8. Reliability analysis of bolt-supported tunnels regarded as homogenized structures10.1002/nag.3588 ↗
9. Closed-form solution and reliability analysis of deep tunnel supported by a concrete liner and a covered compressible layer within the viscoelastic Burger rock10.1007/s00603-021-02401-6 ↗
10. Time-variant reliability analysis of underground structures against delayed failure based on the probability density evolution method10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106695 ↗
11. Xu, J.C., Sun, C., and Rui, G.R. (2024). NSGA–III–XGBoost–based stochastic reliability analysis of deep soft rock tunnel. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052127 ↗
12. System reliability assessment for a rock tunnel with multiple failure modes10.1007/s00603-012-0285-3 ↗
13. High dimension model representation–based response surface for reliability analysis of tunnel10.1155/2018/8049139 ↗
14. Reliability analysis of tunnel using least square support vector machine10.1016/j.tust.2013.11.004 ↗
15. Influence of a weak layer on the tunnel face stability—Reliability and sensitivity analysis10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103507 ↗
16. Reliability analysis of tunnels using a metamodeling technique based on augmented radial basis functions10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.007 ↗
17. Assessment of tunnel face stability subjected to an adjacent tunnel10.1016/j.ress.2020.107228 ↗
18. Xu, J.C., Jiang, Y., and Yang, C.B. (2022). Landslide displacement prediction during the sliding process using XGBoost, SVR and RNNs. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126056 ↗
19. Semi–surrogate modelling of droplets evaporation process via XGBoost integrated CFD simulations10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164968 ↗
20. Bayesian–entropy gaussian process for constrained metamodeling10.1016/j.ress.2021.107762 ↗
21. Tunnel face reliability analysis using active learning Kriging model–Case of a two–layer soils10.1007/s11771-019-4129-0 ↗
22. Reliability based approach to tunnel lining design using a modified point estimate method10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.034 ↗
23. An effective implementation of reliability methods for Bayesian model updating of structural dynamic models with multiple uncertain parameters10.1016/j.ress.2022.108634 ↗
24. System reliability analysis of tunnels reinforced by rockbolts10.1016/j.tust.2017.03.003 ↗
25. An efficient probabilistic design approach for tunnel face stability by inverse reliability analysis10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101210 ↗
26. Reliability analysis of the stress intensity factor using multilevel Monte Carlo methods10.1016/j.probengmech.2023.103497 ↗
27. Gaussian process regression for maximum entropy distribution10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109644 ↗
28. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J.L. (2015, January 7–9). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, San Diego, CA, USA.
29. Slope reliability and back analysis of failure with geotechnical parameters estimated using Bayesian inference10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.11.008 ↗
30. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C.K.I. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
31. Statistical aspects of Tricomi’s function and modified Bessel functions of the second kind10.1007/PL00009777 ↗
32. Griffiths, D., and Fenton, G. (2008). Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.
33. Lophaven, S.N., Nielsen, H.B., and Sondergaard, J. (2002). DACE: A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox, Tech. Rep. IMM-TR-2002-12, Technical University of Denmark.
34. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments10.1080/00401706.1996.10484509 ↗