Exploring the Use of Landmarks to Aid Pedestrian Wayfinding
Source abstract
Abstract
When wayfinding with mobile maps, the acquisition of spatial knowledge can be limited by relying on automated route instructions and the small map on the screen. Repeating a route without support from navigation aids may be challenging as the user has been focused on their mobile phone and not the surroundings. According to theories of spatial knowledge acquisition, landmarks are environmental elements important in the development of such knowledge. This study examines how different navigation aids impact spatial knowledge, with a particular focus on landmarks. Participants navigated a route using one of three aids: a booklet of sequential landmarks, a booklet of Google Maps screenshots, or a paper map. The landmarks were selected based on their conspicuity and strategic placement along the route. Thirty participants completed tasks assessing their spatial knowledge of the route and surrounding area after walking it. This study, divided into three phases, compared the effectiveness of each navigation aid, highlighting the effectiveness of landmarks in wayfinding. Results indicate that landmarks significantly enhance wayfinding, especially for pedestrians navigating short, pre-set routes without a map. This suggests that incorporating landmarks into mobile maps could improve on-screen spatial information.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spatial Cognition and Navigation · Geographic Information Systems Studies · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Design and Architecture, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Landmarks as navigational aids on street maps
2. When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions?10.1007/3-540-45424-1_20 ↗
3. Richter, K.-F., and Winter, S. (2014). Landmarks: GIScience for Intelligent Services, 1st ed, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-05732-3 ↗
4. GPS.gov (2022, June 19). GPS Accuracy, Available online: https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/accuracy.
5. Meyers, S. (2022, June 19). The Keyhole Problem. Available online: http://www.aristeia.com/TKP/draftPaper.pdf.
6. Sheridan, T.B. (2002). Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
7. The implications of inter-visibility between landmarks on wayfinding performance: An investigation using a virtual urban environment10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.08.004 ↗
8. The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z ↗
9. Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.002 ↗
10. Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.08.001 ↗
11. A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.01.004 ↗
12. A framework of interaction costs in information visualization10.1109/TVCG.2008.109 ↗
13. Nielsen, J., and Budiu, R. (2012). Mobile Usability, New Riders.
14. Tasks, strategies, and cognitive processes associated with navigational map reading: A review perspective10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05602010.x ↗
15. Mental rotation of map displays10.1207/s15327043hup0504_3 ↗
16. Allen, G.L. (2004). Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. Human Spatial Memory: Remembering Where, Psychology Press. Available online: https://geog.ucsb.edu/~montello/pubs/memory.pdf.
17. Abler, R.F., Marcus, M.G., and Olson, J.M. Visualization. Geography’s Inner Worlds: Pervasive Themes in Contemporary American Geography, Rutgers University Press.
18. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse10.1518/001872097778543886 ↗
19. Seager, W., and Fraser, D.S. (May, January 28). Comparing physical, automatic and manual map rotation for pedestrian navigation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘07), San Jose, CA, USA.
20. The role of global and local landmarks in virtual environment navigation10.1162/105474600566628 ↗
21. Allen, G.L. (2007). Assisting pedestrian wayfinding in urban settings: Why references to landmarks are crucial in direction-giving. Applied Spatial Cognition: From Research to Cognitive Technology, Erlbaum.
22. Referring to landmark or street information in route directions: What difference does it make?
23. Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes
24. Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments
25. Raubal, M., Mark, D., and Frank, A. (2013). Prospects and challenges of landmarks in navigation services. Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space, Springer. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography.10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9 ↗
26. Richter, K.-F., and Winter, S. (2011, January 21–25). Harvesting User-generated Content for Semantic Spatial Information: The Case of Landmarks in OpenStreetMap. Proceedings of the Surveying and Spatial Sciences Biennial Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.
27. The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces
28. How can we best use landmarks to support older people in navigation?10.1080/01449290512331319021 ↗
29. Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2 ↗
30. (2022, December 05). Laerd Statistics. Available online: https://statistics.laerd.com.
31. Algorithm AS 62: A generator for the sampling distribution of the Mann-Whitney U statistic
32. Richards, G. (2008). Psychology: The Key Concepts, Routledge.10.4324/9780203892930 ↗
33. Dillemuth, J. (2008). Map Use and Spatial Knowledge Acquisition with Small, Mobile Map Displays. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of California]. Available online: https://search.proquest.com/openview/cc564b6d51545316161a714b5c0c2404/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.