journal article·2024-08-15Open access

Chemical Risk Assessment for Small Businesses: Development of the Chemical Hazard Assessment and Prioritization Risk (CHAP-Risk) Tool

Thomas Tenkate, Desre M. Kramer, Daniel Drolet, Peter Strahlendorf, Cheryl E. Peters, Sana Candeloro, D. Linn Holness

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 16

Abstract

There are a large number of chemicals commercially available, but relatively few have legislated occupational exposure limits. Assessing the hazard and risk posed by most chemicals used in the workplace is therefore challenging, especially for small workplaces. This paper describes the development of an easy-to-use MS Excel spreadsheet-based tool (called CHAP-Risk) designed to assist small businesses to undertake a simple assessment of the health and safety risks posed by the chemicals they use. We developed the CHAP-Risk tool through engaging an expert review panel and undertaking a detailed review of existing tools, and by validating a trial version which was piloted by six workplaces and 59 workers. We received multiple rounds of feedback from key experts and end-users, and in response, through 58 versions, refined CHAP-Risk to produce the final free public-release version of the tool. Workplace participants thought that the CHAP-Risk tool would be useful in improving worker and employers’ understanding of workplace chemical risks. However, because this tool required users to have more in-depth knowledge of workplaces’ processes, there was mixed feedback on its usability: those with OHS training were very positive, while others thought it would be too difficult for shop-floor workers to use.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Risk and Safety Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Occupational and Public Health, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada

Independent Researcher Montreal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada

BC Center for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada

BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada

Superior Propane, Mississauga, ON L5R 4B2, Canada

Division of Occupational Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada

Funding

WorkSafeBC

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. (2024, January 12). TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/tsca-inventory.
2. Lentz, T.J., Seaton, M., Rane, P., Giblert, S.J., McKernan, L.T., and Whitaker, C. (2019). NIOSH Technical Report: The NIOSH Occupational Exposure Banding Process for Chemical Risk Management, National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety.
3. Bru, E., Op de Beeck, R., Van Herpe, S., Isotalo, L., Laamanen, I., Orthen, B., Wagner, E., Flaspoler, E., Reinert, D., and Galwas, M. (2009). Expert Forecast on Emerging Chemical Risks Related to Occupational Health and Safety, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/report-expert-forecast-emerging-chemical-risks-related-occupational-safety-and-health/view.
4. Takala, J. (2005, January 18–22). Introductory Report—Decent Work—Safe Work. Proceedings of the XVIIth World Congress on Safety and Health at Work, Orlando, FL, USA. Available online: http://ohsa.org.mt/Portals/0/docs/intrep_05.pdf.
5. (2023, June 02). Burden of Occupational Cancer in Canada: Major Workplace Carcinogens and Prevention of Exposure. Available online: https://www.occupationalcancer.ca/2019/national-burden-report/.
6. (2019). WHMIS 2015: The Basics, WorkSafeBC. Available online: https://www.worksafebc.com/resources/health-safety/whmis/whmis-basics-2015?lang=en&direct.
7. (2003). Improving Occupational Safety and Health in SMEs: Examples of Effective Assistance, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/report-improving-occupational-safety-and-health-smes-examples-effective-assistance/view.
8. Setting priorities: Testing a workplace tool to identify and prioritize workplace chemical hazards10.3233/WOR-205270 ↗
9. (2003). Hazardous Substances in the Workplace—Minimising the Risk, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Available online: http://osha.europa.eu/publications/forum/10/view.
10. Biggs, D., and Crumbie, N. (2001). Characteristics of People Working with Chemical Products in Small Firms, Health and Safety Executive.
11. A structured strategy for assessing chemical risks, suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises
12. A UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals: Toxicological considerations10.1016/S0003-4878(98)00050-7 ↗
13. (2006). Minimising Chemical Risk to Workers’ Health and Safety through Substitution, European Commission. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c94c5caf-fca6-498e-8dff-f75c6e20147f.
14. (2024, July 20). Safety and Health in the Use of Chemicals at Work, Available online: https://www.ilo.org/resource/safety-use-chemicals-work.
15. Bainbridge, W. (2004). User-Centered Design. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, Sage.
16. Usability Testing for Developing Effective Interactive Multimedia Software: Concepts, Dimensions and Procedures
17. Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think10.1145/3166.3170 ↗
18. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 ↗
19. (1998). Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDT)s—Part 14 Menu Dialogues (Standard No. ISO/IEC 9241–14).
20. Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.07.014 ↗
21. Health and Safety Executive (2023, June 02). COSHH e-Tool, Available online: https://www.hse.gov.uk/coshh/essentials/coshh-tool.htm.
22. (2023, June 02). Stoffenmanager®. Available online: https://stoffenmanager.com/.
23. (2023, June 02). Tksoft. Available online: https://kemi-arvi.tksoft.com/.
24. (2023, June 02). PRIO. Available online: https://www.kemi.se/en/prio-start.
25. (2023, June 02). NIOSH Occupational Exposure Banding e-Tool, Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Niosh-oeb/.
26. (2023, June 02). International Chemical Control Kit. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/protection/safework/ctrl_banding/toolkit/icct/.
27. With a little help from our friends: Collaborative research partnerships in three workplace-based occupational disease research projects10.3233/WOR-192861 ↗
28. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., and Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage. [4th ed.].
29. A systematic review of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety training10.5271/sjweh.3259 ↗
30. Effectiveness of occupational health and safety training10.1108/JWL-11-2015-0087 ↗
31. The effect of active and passive occupational health and safety (OHS) training on OHS awareness and empowerment to participate in injury prevention among workers in Ontario and British Columbia (Canada)10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.026 ↗
32. Safety training: Enhancing outcomes through virtual environments
33. Online vs conventional safety training approaches
34. A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002 ↗
35. Druley, K. (2021). OSHA’s top 10 most cited violations for FY 2020. Safety+Health, 32–35. Available online: https://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/20956-oshas-top-10-most-cited-violations-for-fy-2020.
36. Accuracy, comprehensibility, and use of material safety data sheets: A review10.1002/ajim.20613 ↗
37. Safety data sheets as a hazard communication tool: An assessment of suitability and readability10.1016/j.shaw.2024.01.006 ↗
38. The Small Business Systematic Review Team. Workplace health understandings and processes in small businesses: A systematic review of the qualitative literature10.1007/s10926-009-9227-7 ↗
39. Organizational practices and workplace health and safety: A cross-sectional study in manufacturing companies10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.004 ↗
40. Characteristics of effective health and safety committees: Survey results10.1002/ajim.22096 ↗
41. Effectiveness of joint health and safety committees: A realist review10.1002/ajim.22143 ↗
42. Barriers to OHS interventions in small and medium-sized enterprises10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.020 ↗
43. Important factors in common among organizations making large improvement in OHS performance: Results of an exploratory multiple case study10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.023 ↗
44. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations10.1073/pnas.2006991117 ↗
45. Occupational health science in the time of COVID-19: Now more than ever10.1007/s41542-020-00064-3 ↗
46. Pryor, P., Provan, D., Casey, T., and Hu, X. (2021). The generalist OHS professional: International and Australian perspectives. The Core Body of Knowledge for Generalist OHS Professionals, AIHS. [2nd ed.]. Available online: https://www.ohsbok.org.au/.
47. A qualitative study to identify characteristics of a desirable training program for the prevention of occupational skin disease10.1093/annweh/wxaa111 ↗
48. The development and testing of a tool to assess Joint Health and Safety Committee functioning and effectiveness10.1002/ajim.22703 ↗
49. (2024, July 22). Global Framework on Chemicals-for a Planet Free of Harm from Chemicals and Waste, Available online: https://www.chemicalsframework.org/.