journal article·2024-05-11Open access

A Construction Method for a Dynamic Weighted Protein Network Using Multi-Level Embedding

Peng Li, Shufang Guo, Chenghao Zhang, Mosharaf Md Parvej, Jing Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 10

Abstract

The rapid development of high-throughput technology has generated a large amount of protein–protein interaction (PPI) data, which provide a large amount of data support for constructing dynamic protein–protein interaction networks (PPINs). Constructing dynamic PPINs and applying them to recognize protein complexes has become a hot research topic. Most existing methods for complex recognition cannot fully mine the information of PPINs. To address this problem, we propose a construction method of dynamic weighted protein network by multi-level embedding (DWPNMLE). It can reflect the protein network’s dynamics and the protein network’s higher-order proximity. Firstly, the protein active period is calculated to divide the protein subnetworks at different time points. Then, the connection probability is used for the proteins possessing the same time points to judge whether there is an interaction relationship between them. Then, the corresponding protein subnetworks (multiple adjacency matrices) are constructed. Secondly, the multiple feature matrices are constructed using one-hot coding with the gene ontology (GO) information. Next, the first embedding is performed using variational graph auto-encoders (VGAEs) to aggregate features efficiently, followed by the second embedding using deep attributed network embedding (DANE) to strengthen the node representations learned in the first embedding and to maintain the first-order and higher-order proximity of the original network; finally, we compute the cosine similarity to obtain the final dynamic weighted PPIN. To evaluate the effectiveness of DWPNMLE, we apply four classical protein-complex-recognition algorithms on the DWPNMLE and compare them with two other dynamic protein network construction methods. The experimental results demonstrate that DWPNMLE significantly enhances the accuracy of complex recognition with high robustness, and the algorithms’ efficiency is also within a reasonable range.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Protein Structure and Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China

Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Network-Based Intelligent Computing, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China

College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

School of Data Intelligence, Yantai Institute of Science and Technology, Yantai 265699, China

Funding

2021–2023 National Natural Science Foundation of China · 2022–2025 National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Widespread expansion of protein interaction capabilities by alternative splicing10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.029 ↗
2. Protein–protein interaction maps: A lead towards cellular functions10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02323-X ↗
3. The er membrane protein complex is a transmembrane domain insertase10.1126/science.aao3099 ↗
4. Engineering the dynamic properties of protein networks through sequence variation10.1021/acscentsci.6b00205 ↗
5. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome10.1073/pnas.061034498 ↗
6. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes10.1038/415141a ↗
7. Dip, the database of interacting proteins: A research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions10.1093/nar/30.1.303 ↗
8. Is there a bias in proteome research?10.1101/gr.206701 ↗
9. Cinaglia, P., and Cannataro, M. (2022). Network alignment and motif discovery in dynamic networks. Netw. Model. Anal. Health Inform. Bioinform., 11.10.1007/s13721-022-00383-1 ↗
10. Construction of refined protein interaction network for predicting essential proteins10.1109/TCBB.2017.2665482 ↗
11. Identification of protein complexes by using a spatial and temporal active protein interaction network10.1109/TCBB.2017.2749571 ↗
12. To embed or not: Network embedding as a paradigm in computational biology10.3389/fgene.2019.00381 ↗
13. Construction and contextualization approaches for protein–protein interaction networks10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.040 ↗
14. Advances in the development of representation learning and its innovations against COVID-1910.3390/covid3090096 ↗
15. Dpcmne: Detecting protein complexes from protein–protein interaction networks via multi-level network embedding10.1109/TCBB.2021.3050102 ↗
16. protein2vec: Predicting protein–protein interactions based on lstm10.1109/TCBB.2020.3003941 ↗
17. Protein complex prediction: A survey10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.01.011 ↗
18. Xu, B., Li, K., Zheng, W., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., and He, Z. (2018). Protein complexes identification based on go attributed network embedding. BMC Bioinform., 19.10.1186/s12859-018-2555-x ↗
19. Hiscf: Leveraging higher-order structures for clustering analysis in biological networks10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa775 ↗
20. Zhao, B.-W., Hu, L., You, Z.-H., Wang, L., and Su, X.-R. (2022). Hingrl: Predicting drug–disease associations with graph representation learning on heterogeneous information networks. Brief. Bioinform., 23.10.1093/bib/bbab515 ↗
21. An integrated mass spectrometric and computational framework for the analysis of protein interaction networks10.1038/nbt1289 ↗
22. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug10.1126/science.1160165 ↗
23. Tang, X., Wang, J., Liu, B., Li, M., Chen, G., and Pan, Y. (2011). A comparison of the functional modules identified from time course and static ppi network data. BMC Bioinform., 12.10.1186/1471-2105-12-339 ↗
24. Construction and application of dynamic protein interaction network based on time course gene expression data10.1002/pmic.201200277 ↗
25. Detecting protein complexes from active protein interaction networks constructed with dynamic gene expression profiles10.1186/1477-5956-11-S1-S20 ↗
26. Zhao, J., Sun, J., Shuai, S.C., Zhao, Q., and Shuai, J. (2023). Predicting potential interactions between lncrnas and proteins via combined graph auto-encoder methods. Brief. Bioinform., 24.10.1093/bib/bbac527 ↗
27. A construction method of dynamic protein interaction networks by using relevant features of gene expression data10.1109/TCBB.2023.3264241 ↗
28. Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein–protein interaction networks10.1038/nmeth.1938 ↗
29. Wu, M., Li, X., Kwoh, C.-K., and Ng, S.-K. (2009). A core-attachment based method to detect protein complexes in ppi networks. BMC Bioinform., 10.10.1186/1471-2105-10-169 ↗
30. Vlasblom, J., and Wodak, S.J. (2009). Markov clustering versus affinity propagation for the partitioning of protein interaction graphs. BMC Bioinform., 10.10.1186/1471-2105-10-99 ↗
31. Predicting protein complexes from ppi data: A core-attachment approach10.1089/cmb.2008.01TT ↗
32. The biogrid interaction database: 2019 update10.1093/nar/gky1079 ↗
33. Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes10.1093/nar/gkn1005 ↗
34. Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: Temporal compartmentalization of cellular processes10.1126/science.1120499 ↗
35. Gene ontology annotations and resources10.1093/nar/gks1050 ↗
36. Identifying protein complexes in protein–protein interaction data using graph convolutional network10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3110845 ↗