journal article·2024-01-11Open access

Monte Carlo Sampling of Inverse Problems Based on a Squeeze-and-Excitation Convolutional Neural Network Applied to Ground-Penetrating Radar Crosshole Traveltime: A Numerical Simulation Study

Hanqing Qiao, Cai Liu, Shengchao Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

Monte Carlo-based sampling methods (MCMC) can be used to solve inverse problems affecting ground penetrating radar (GPR) data. However, due to their high computational complexity, they have not been widely used in practical applications. This article uses neural network methods to replace the computationally complex forward problem of Monte Carlo methods. However, the neural network method is an approximation of the accurate formula method, and this may introduce model errors. In order to reduce the impact of model errors, in this study, we incorporate the Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) attention mechanism into Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to further improve the accuracy of the network. Moreover, with the statistical advantages of the MCMC method, model errors can be explained during the inversion process, further reducing their impact. We apply the proposed method to solve the inversion problem of crosshole ground-penetrating radar travel time data. Compared with commonly used approximate forward models, the method proposed in this paper has better accuracy. The results of data experiments indicate that this method can effectively invert the velocity of underground media.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China

Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, China Geological Survey (CGS), Langfang 065000, China

College of Computer Science, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610000, China

Funding

Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences · China Geological Survey · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Daniels, D. (2004). Ground Penetrating Radar, IEE. [2nd ed.].10.1049/PBRA015E ↗
2. Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.007 ↗
3. Taming the non-linearity problem in GPR full-waveform inversion for high contrast media10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.12.001 ↗
4. Application of pre-stack reverse time migration based on FWI velocity estimation to ground penetrating radar data10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.008 ↗
5. Xue, M. (2021). Inversion of Common Offset Ground Penetrating Radar Data Based on Ray Theory. [Master’s Thesis, Jilin University].
6. Ground Penetrating Radar Waveform Inversion Method without Extracting Excitation Pulses
7. Simulation of Metal Mining Exploration Based on Ground Penetrating Radar Wave Velocity Tomography
8. Linear GPR conversion for loose soil and a planar air soil interface10.1109/36.975005 ↗
9. Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems10.1029/94JB03097 ↗
10. Ortiz, J.M., and Emery, X. (2008). VIII International Geostatistics Congress, University of Chile. Geostatistics.
11. Inverse problems with non-trivial priors: Efficient solution through sequential Gibbs sampling: Computational
12. Accounting for imperfect forward modeling in geophysical inverse problems-exemplified for crosshole tomography10.1190/geo2013-0215.1 ↗
13. Zhao, Y. (2022). CNN Based Inversion of Ground Penetrating Radar Data and Automatic Recognition of Road Diseases. [Master’s Thesis, Jilin University].
14. Ji, Y. (2021). Research on Dielectric Constant Inversion of Ground Penetrating Radar Images Based on Deep Learning. [Master’s Thesis, Shandong University].
15. Liu, T., Su, Y., and Huang, C. (2018). Inversion of ground penetrating radar data based on neural networks. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10050730 ↗
16. GPRInvNet: Deep learning based ground penetrating radar data conversion for tunnel liners10.1109/TGRS.2020.3046454 ↗
17. Efficient Monte Carlo sampling of inverse problems using a neural network-based forward—Applied to GPR crosshole traveltime inversion10.1093/gji/ggx380 ↗
18. Deep-learning inversion: A next-generation seismic velocity model building methodDL for velocity model building10.1190/geo2018-0249.1 ↗
19. GPR time-frequency domain joint electromagnetic inversion method based on deep learning
20. Structural Feature Detection Method for Ground Penetrating Radar 2D Profile Image Based on Deep Learning
21. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–23). Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
22. Wang, Q., Wu, B., Zhu, P., Li, P., Zuo, W., and Hu, Q. (2019, January 13–19). ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01155 ↗
23. Ba, J., Mnih, V., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2014). Multiple objectrecognition with visual attention. arXiv.
24. Inverse problems = quest for information
25. Applications of seismic travel-time tomography10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb00728.x ↗
26. Wave path eikonal traveltime inversion: Theory10.1190/1.1443514 ↗
27. Seismic tomography in boreholes
28. SIPPI: A Matlab toolbox for sampling the solution to inverse problems with complex prior information: Part 2, Application to cross hole GPR tomography10.1016/j.cageo.2012.10.001 ↗
29. Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data10.1190/1.2761848 ↗
30. Full-waveform inversion of crosshole radar data based on 2-D finite-difference time-domain solutions of Maxwell’s equations10.1109/TGRS.2007.901048 ↗
31. MonteCarlofullwave-form inversion of crosshole GPR data using multiple-point geostatistical a priori information10.1190/geo2011-0170.1 ↗