Effect of Loading Frequency on the Fatigue Response of Adhesive Joints up to the VHCF Range
Source abstract
Abstract
Modern structures are designed to withstand in-service loads over a broad frequency spectrum. Nonetheless, mechanical properties in numerical codes are assumed to be frequency-independent to simplify calculations or due to a lack of experimental data, and this approach could lead to overdesign or failures. This study aims to quantify the frequency effects in the fatigue applications of a bi-material adhesive joint through analytical, numerical, and experimental procedures. Analytical and finite element models allowed the specimen design, whereas the frequency effects were investigated through a conventional servo-hydraulic apparatus at 5, 25, and 50 Hz and with an ultrasonic fatigue testing machine at 20 kHz. Experimentally, the fatigue life increases with the applied test frequency. Run-out stress data at 109 cycles follow the same trend: at 25 Hz and 50 Hz, the run-out data were found at 10 MPa, increasing to 15 MPa at 20 kHz. The P–S–N curves showed that frequency effects have a minor impact on the experimental variability and that standard deviation values lie in the range of 0.3038–0.7691 between 5 Hz and 20 kHz. Finally, the trend of fatigue strengths at 2·106 cycles with the applied loading frequency for selected probability levels was estimated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
Advanced Joining Technologies Laboratory (J-Tech), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Vibration fatigue analysis using response spectra10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106192 ↗
2. Vibration fatigue dynamic stress simulation under non-stationary state10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107006 ↗
3. Response spectrum method for fatigue damage assessment of mechanical systems10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107278 ↗
4. (2013). Spacecraft Mechanical Loads Analysis Handbook, ECSS Secretariat, Requirements & Standards Division, ESA-ESTEC (Standard No. ECSS-E-HB-32-26A).
5. (2020). Testing, ECSS Secretariat, Requirements & Standards Division, ESA-ESTEC (Standard No. ECSS-E-ST-10-03C).
6. (2021). Fracture Control, ECSS Secretariat, Requirements & Standards Division, ESA-ESTEC (Standard No. ECSS-E-ST-32-01C).
7. Dynamic frequency-dependent fatigue damage in metals: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.finmec.2023.100167 ↗
8. Mechanical properties of an epoxy-based adhesive under high strain rate loadings at low temperature environment10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.034 ↗
9. Effect of high strain rate and low temperature on mode II fracture toughness of ductile adhesive10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.09.003 ↗
10. Simulation of low velocity impact on composite laminates with progressive failure analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.027 ↗
11. Mechanical characterisation of the dynamic tensile properties of CFRP sheet and adhesive at medium strain rates10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.032 ↗
12. Experimental study on residual properties of carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) and aluminum single-lap adhesive joints at different strain rates after transverse pre-impact10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.018 ↗
13. Tensile strength of unidirectional CFRP laminate under high strain rate10.1163/156855107780918937 ↗
14. Effects of loading rates on mechanical property and failure behavior of single-lap adhesive joints with carbon fiber reinforced plastics and aluminum alloys10.1007/s00170-019-04804-w ↗
15. Ma, H., Bai, X., Ran, Y.R., Wei, X., and An, Z. (2022). Modeling the Effect of Stress Ratio, Loading Frequency and Fiber Orientation on the Fatigue Response of Composite Materials. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14142772 ↗
16. Multi-material adhesive joints for automotive industry10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.009 ↗
17. Replacing welding with adhesive bonding: An industrial case study10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103064 ↗
18. Investigation of damage effect on the effective dynamic mechanical properties of an adhesive in linear and nonlinear response regimes10.1177/1077546315612904 ↗
19. Investigation of mechanical properties and failure surfaces of adhesively bonded composites subjected to vibration loads10.1088/2053-1591/ab4534 ↗
20. Effect of vibration fatigue on modal properties of single lap adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.007 ↗
21. Mechanical response of adhesively bonded composite joints subjected to vibration load and axial impact10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107317 ↗
22. Analytical study of the dynamic behavior of a voided adhesively bonded lap joint under axial harmonic load10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.02.021 ↗
23. Numerical analysis of the dynamic behaviour of adhesive joints: A review10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103219 ↗
24. Enhancing mechanical properties of adhesive laminates joints using ultrasonic vibration-assisted preprocessing10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111325 ↗
25. Premature failures in standard test specimens with composite materials induced by stress singularities in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102478 ↗
26. Stress Singularities Resulting from Various Boundary Conditions in Angular Corners of Plates in Extension10.1115/1.4010553 ↗
27. Edge bonded dissimilar orthogonal elastic wedge under normal and shear loading10.1115/1.3601236 ↗
28. Stress singularities at interface corners in bonded dissimilar isotropic elastic materials10.1016/0020-7683(71)90077-1 ↗
29. Two Edge-Bonded Elastic Wedges of Different Materials and Wedge Angles Under Surface Tractions10.1115/1.3408786 ↗
30. Stress singularities and fracture at interface corners in bonded joints10.1016/0143-7496(88)90031-0 ↗
31. The Design of Joints Between Elastically Dissimilar Components10.1243/03093247V271015 ↗
32. Compact solutions for the corner singularity in bonded joints10.1016/S0143-7496(99)00032-9 ↗
33. A two-term stress function approach to evaluate stress distribution in bonded joints of different geometries10.1243/030932402760203856 ↗
34. Evaluation of the Singular Stresses in Adhesive Joints10.1163/156856109X433018 ↗
35. On ensuring structural integrity for configurations with stress singularities: A review10.1111/ffe.12425 ↗
36. Study of the singular term in mixed adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.02.002 ↗
37. Intensity of singular stress field variation as a function of the Young’s modulus in single lap adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102418 ↗
38. Cohesive-zone models and singularities at corners and cracks in homogeneous materials10.1016/j.jmps.2022.105159 ↗
39. Design free of stress singularities for bi-material components10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.11.009 ↗
40. Stress concentration analyses of bi-material bonded joints without in-plane stress singularities10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.01.004 ↗
41. A New Test Method for the Measurement of Normal-Shear Bonding Strength at Bi-Material Interface10.1080/15376494.2011.643278 ↗
42. Tensile and shear strength of bimaterial interfaces within composite materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.01.003 ↗
43. Pederbelli, D., Tridello, A., Paolino, D.S., and Goglio, L. (2023). Effects of singular and non-singular stress fields on Very High Cycle Fatigue life of adhesive joints. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1–16.10.1111/ffe.14171 ↗
44. Bathias, C., and Paris, P.C. (2005). Gigacycle Fatigue in Mechanical Practice, CRC Dekker.10.1201/9780203020609 ↗
45. There is no infinite fatigue life in metallic materials10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00183.x ↗
46. High-cycle and very-high-cycle fatigue behaviour of a stainless steel for air-conditioning compressor valve plates10.1108/IJSI-10-2021-0108 ↗
47. VHCF response of H13 steels produced with different manufacturing processes10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.867 ↗
48. Tridello, A., Paolino, D.S., and Rossetto, M. (2020). Ultrasonic VHCF Tests on Very Large Specimens with Risk-Volume Up to 5000 mm3. App. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072210 ↗
49. Fatigue response up to 109 cycles of a structural epoxy adhesive10.1111/ffe.13240 ↗
50. An innovative testing technique for assessing the VHCF response of adhesively bonded joints10.1111/ffe.12874 ↗
51. Size-effect in Very High Cycle Fatigue: A review10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106462 ↗
52. Experimental determination of structural damping of different materials10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.013 ↗
53. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. (Standard No. ASTM E8-21).
54. (2012). Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties, Part 2. CEN (Standard No. BS EN ISO 527-2-2012).
55. (2023, October 15). SikaPower®-1277, Product Data Sheet. Version 04.01 (04-2022). Available online: https://industry.sika.com/content/dam/dms/gb01/7/sikapower_-1277.pdf.
56. Fractographic identification of fracture origin mainly controlled by the intensity of singular stress field (ISSF) in prismatic butt joint with corner fillet10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102810 ↗
57. Global/Local Stress Analysis of Composite Panels10.1016/0045-7949(90)90027-Y ↗
58. Craig, R.R., and Kurdila, A.J. (2006). Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics, John Wiley & Sons.
59. ANSYS Mechanical APDL (2020). Advanced Analysis Guide, Chapter 6, ANSYS Inc.
60. A unified statistical model for S-N fatigue curves: Probabilistic definition10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01711.x ↗
61. Statistical distributions of Transition Fatigue Strength and Transition Fatigue Life in duplex S–N fatigue curves10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.006 ↗