Which Thumb, the Left or Right, Touches the Letter Keys on a Smartphone QWERTY Soft Keyboard during Two-Thumb Key Entry?
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to observe which thumb, the left or right, is used for keystrokes and examine the patterns during two-thumb key entry on a smartphone QWERTY soft keyboard. A total of 36 college students, including 18 left-handed and 18 right-handed, were recruited for testing, and they had 9.7 years of smartphone use experience on average. A smartphone application was implemented, and whether the left or right thumb was used for touch interactions was recorded for each of the 26 letter keys. As a result, it was found that there were slightly more letter keys that were statistically more often tapped by the left thumb during the two-thumb key entry on the QWERTY soft keyboard, regardless of the participant’s handedness. In addition, all the letter keys were touched statistically more often with the relatively closer one of both thumbs, except for the letter keys G and V in the center. It seemed that the distance between keys and thumbs was regarded as the most important factor influencing the thumb choice for keystrokes, followed by the habituated experience of using physical QWERTY keyboards.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Interactive and Immersive Displays
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korean government (MSIT)
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Palin, K., Feit, A.M., Kim, S., Kristensson, P.O., and Oulasvirta, A. (2019, January 1–4). How do people type on mobile devices? Observations from a study with 37,000 volunteers. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1145/3338286.3340120 ↗
2. Statista (2023, September 24). Leading Smartphone Users Activities Worldwide from July 2022 to June 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1337895/top-smartphone-activities/.
3. Optimizing single-finger keyboard layouts on smartphones10.1016/j.cor.2020.104947 ↗
4. The influence of smartphone text input method, posture, and environment on user experience10.1080/10447318.2020.1719465 ↗
5. Ye, L., Sandnes, F.E., and MacKenzie, I.S. (2020, January 19–24). QB-Gest: Qwerty bimanual gestural input for eyes-free smartphone text input. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Copenhagen, Denmark.10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_16 ↗
6. Repetitive patterns in the locations of touch errors for two-thumb text entry on a smartphone10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103541 ↗
7. Song, J., Ryu, T., Bahn, S., and Yun, M.H. (2011, January 19–23). Performance analysis of text entry with preferred one hand using smartphone touch keyboard. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1037/e578902012-277 ↗
8. Design and evaluation of small, linear QWERTY keyboards10.1016/j.apergo.2013.09.001 ↗
9. Hanna, K.T. (2023, September 24). QWERTY Keyboard. Available online: https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/QWERTY-keyboard.
10. Jiang, X., Li, Y., Jokinen, J.P., Hirvola, V.B., Oulasvirta, A., and Ren, X. (2020, January 25–30). How we type: Eye and finger movement strategies in mobile typing. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3313831.3376711 ↗
11. Negahban, A., Uludag, I., and Yang, Y. (2013, January 18–22). An integer programming approach to optimize typing methods on smartphones. Proceedings of the IIE Annual Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
12. Optimization of split keyboard design for touchscreen devices10.1080/10447318.2018.1464255 ↗
13. Xu, Z., Chen, W., Zhao, D., Luo, J., Wu, T.Y., Gong, J., Yin, S., Zhai, J., and Yang, X.D. (2020, January 25–30). Bitiptext: Bimanual eyes-free text entry on a fingertip keyboard. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3313831.3376306 ↗
14. Pritom, A.I., Mahmud, H., Ahmed, S., Hasan, M.K., and Khan, M.M. (2015, January 21–23). Typehex keyboard: A virtual keyboard for faster typing in Smartphone. Proceedings of the 2015 18th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), Dhaka, Bangladesh.10.1109/ICCITechn.2015.7488126 ↗
15. Effects of button position on a soft keyboard: Muscle activity, touch time, and discomfort in two-thumb text entry10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.008 ↗
16. Effects of Button Width, Height, and Location on a Soft Keyboard: Task Completion Time, Error Rate, and Satisfaction in Two-Thumb Text Entry on Smartphone10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919108 ↗
17. Mrazek, K., and Mohd, T.K. (2021, January 20–22). Using LSTM models on accelerometer data to improve accuracy of Tap Strap 2 wearable keyboard. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction, Kent, OH, USA.10.1007/978-3-030-98404-5_3 ↗
18. Kang, E., Tjolleng, A., Yu, H., Jung, K., and Chang, J. (2023). Investigation into touch performance on a QWERTY soft keyboard on a smartphone: Touch time, accuracy, and satisfaction in two-thumb key entry. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13116825 ↗
19. Go, K., and Tsurumi, L. (2010, January 10–15). Arranging touch screen software keyboard split-keys based on contact surface. Proceedings of the CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1145/1753846.1754060 ↗
20. Fujita, K. (2019, January 7–12). Text entry system for smartphone operation with user’s dominant hand. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), Toyama, Japan.10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00196 ↗
21. Smartphone text input: Effects of experience and phrase complexity on user performance, physiological reaction, and perceived usability10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.019 ↗
22. Edinburgh handedness inventory–short form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045 ↗
23. Greiner, T.M. (1991). Hand Anthropometry of US Army Personnel, United States Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center. Available online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA244533.
24. An observational method of assessing handedness in children and adults10.1080/87565640701539667 ↗
25. Relationship between manual preferences for object manipulation and pointing gestures in infants and toddlers10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00850.x ↗
26. The minimotion typewriter keyboard10.1016/0016-0032(49)90654-7 ↗
27. The QWERTY keyboard: A review10.1016/S0020-7373(83)80010-8 ↗
28. Handedness effects on playing a reversed or normal keyboard10.1080/713754349 ↗
29. A quantitative model for designing keyboard layout10.2466/pms.1999.88.1.113 ↗
30. Turner, C.J., Chaparro, B.S., Sogaard, I.M., and He, J. (2020, January 5–9). The effects of keyboard layout and size on smartphone typing performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Online.10.1177/1071181320641237 ↗
31. Puka, R., Łebkowski, P., and Duda, J. (2021). One Row Keyboard: The concept of designing a common layout for physical and virtual keyboards. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10060663 ↗
32. Similarities between digits’ movements in grasping, touching and pushing10.1007/s00221-010-2236-0 ↗
33. Evidence of energetic optimization during adaptation differs for metabolic, mechanical, and perceptual estimates of energetic cost10.1038/s41598-017-08147-y ↗
34. Humans use minimum cost movements in a whole-body task10.1038/s41598-021-99423-5 ↗
35. Bennett-Pierre, G., Asaba, M., and Gweon, H. (2018, January 25–28). Preschoolers consider expected task difficulty to decide what to do and whom to help. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), Madison, WI, USA.
36. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement10.1037/h0055392 ↗
37. Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3 ↗
38. Parhi, P., Karlson, A.K., and Bederson, B.B. (2006, January 12–15). Target size study for one-handed thumb use on small touchscreen devices. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Helsinki, Finland.10.1145/1152215.1152260 ↗
39. Symptoms associated with reading from a smartphone in conditions of light and dark10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.014 ↗
40. A field study on spinal postures and postural variations during smartphone use among university students10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103183 ↗