journal article·2023-08-10Open access

Deriving Ground Truth Labels for Regression Problems Using Annotator Precision

Benjamin Johnston, Philip de Chazal

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 16

Abstract

When training machine learning models with practical applications, a quality ground truth dataset is critical. Unlike in classification problems, there is currently no effective method for determining a single ground truth value or landmark from a set of annotations in regression problems. We propose a novel method for deriving ground truth labels in regression problems that considers the performance and precision of individual annotators when identifying each label separately. In contrast to the commonly accepted method of computing the global mean, our method does not assume each annotator to be equally capable of completing the specified task, but rather ensures that higher-performing annotators have a greater contribution to the final result. The ground truth selection method described within this paper provides a means of improving the quality of input data for machine learning model development by removing lower-quality labels. In this study, we objectively demonstrate the improved performance by applying the method to a simulated dataset where a canonical ground truth position can be known, as well as to a sample of data collected from crowd-sourced labels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning and Data Classification · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia

Franklin.ai, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Balaei, A.T., Sutherland, K., Cistulli, P.A., and de Chazal, P. (2017, January 18–21). Automatic detection of obstructive sleep apnea using facial images. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017), Melbourne, VIC, Australia.10.1109/ISBI.2017.7950504 ↗
2. Johnston, B., and de Chazal, P. (2019, January 23–27). Automatic PAP Mask Sizing with an Error Correcting Autoencoder. Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857317 ↗
3. Johnston, B., and de Chazal, P. (2018, January 18–21). A Fully Automated System for Sizing Nasal PAP Masks Using Facial Photographs. Proceedings of the 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513358 ↗
4. Toward an Automatic System for Computer-Aided Assessment in Facial Palsy10.1089/fpsam.2019.29000.gua ↗
5. Aryal, A., and Becerik-Gerber, B. (2019, January 13–14). Skin Temperature Extraction Using Facial Landmark Detection and Thermal Imaging for Comfort Assessment. Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3360322.3360848 ↗
6. Learning from crowds
7. (2023, July 09). What Is CAPTCHA?. Available online: https://support.google.com/a/answer/1217728.
8. Dzieza, J.T.V. (The Verge, 2019). Why CAPTCHAs have gotten so difficult, The Verge.
9. A review of image-based automatic facial landmark identification techniques10.1186/s13640-018-0324-4 ↗
10. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Observer Error-Rates Using the EM Algorithm10.2307/2346806 ↗
11. Effect of a comprehensive deep-learning model on the accuracy of chest x-ray interpretation by radiologists: A retrospective, multireader multicase study
12. Sinha, V.B., Rao, S., and Balasubramanian, V.N. (2018). Fast Dawid-Skene: A Fast Vote Aggregation Scheme for Sentiment Classification. arXiv.
13. Johnston, B., and de Chazal, P. (2019, January 23–27). The Effect of Landmark Variability on Automated PAP Mask Sizing. Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856336 ↗
14. (2023, May 21). Python Implementation. Available online: https://github.com/doc-E-brown/johnstondechazal.
15. 300 Faces In-The-Wild Challenge: Database and results10.1016/j.imavis.2016.01.002 ↗
16. Milborrow, S., Morkel, J., and Nicolls, F. (2023, August 05). The MUCT Landmarked Face Database. Available online: http://www.milbo.org/muct/The-MUCT-Landmarked-Face-Database.pdf.