Research on Effective Design Methods of Core Beam of Full Bridge Aeroelastic Model
Source abstract
Abstract
The trial-and-error method is complex and tedious, but often adapted to determine the cross-section sizes of core beams in the design of reduced-scale models. In this study, two optimization methods, the optimization methods in ANSYS and the genetic algorithm, are investigated to optimize the cross-section sizes of core beams of reduced-scale models, which centers around two targeted moments of inertia and a targeted torsion constant. Due to the difficulty of obtaining an analytical solution of the torsion constant, a series of numerical solutions are proposed. Then, taking a U-shaped cross section as an example, the four geometric sizes of the section are optimized by the ANSYS optimization method and the genetic algorithm, respectively. The results of both methods are in good agreement with the targeted values, but the ANSYS optimization method is prone to fall into the local optimization zone and hence could be easily affected by the initial values. The shortcomings of the ANSYS optimization method can be easily avoided by the genetic algorithm, and it is easier to reach the global optimal solution. Finally, taking a suspension bridge with a main span of 920 m as a prototype, the full-bridge aeroelastic model is designed and the genetic algorithm is used to optimize the cross-section sizes of core beams in the bridge tower and the deck. Natural frequencies identified from the aeroelastic model agree well with the target ones, indicating the structural stiffness, which is provided by the core beams, has been modelled successfully.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou 570100, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Khamprapai, W., Tsai, C.-F., and Wang, P. (2020). Analyzing the Performance of the Multiple-Searching Genetic Algorithm to Generate Test Cases. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10207264 ↗
2. Flutter Stability of Very Long Suspension Bridges10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1998)3:3(132) ↗
3. Ito, M. (1991, January 10–11). Cable-stayed Bridges: Recent Developments and Their Future. Proceedings of the Seminar, Yokohama, Japan.
4. Feasibility of a 1400 m Span Steel Cable-Stayed Bridge10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:5(444) ↗
5. Xu, Y.-L. (2013). Wind Effects on Cable-Supported Bridges, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118188293 ↗
6. The action of flexible bridges under wind, I: Flutter theory10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80028-5 ↗
7. The action of flexible bridges under wind, II: Buffeting theory10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80029-7 ↗
8. Resonance of steel wind turbines: Problems and solutions10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.053 ↗
9. A physical modeler’s view of computational wind engineering10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.015 ↗
10. Bridge deck flutter deriv-atives: Efficient numerical evaluation exploiting their interdependence10.1016/j.jweia.2014.11.006 ↗
11. Bridge aerodynamics and aeroelasticity: A comparison of modeling schemes10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.09.015 ↗
12. Wind-induced effects on bluff bodies in turbulent flows: Nonstationary, non-Gaussian and nonlinear features10.1016/j.jweia.2013.06.002 ↗
13. Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messina suspension bridge10.1016/j.jweia.2004.01.005 ↗
14. An experimental validation of a band superposition model of the aerodynamic forces acting on multi-box deck sections10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.005 ↗
15. Wind effects on long span bridges: Consistency of wind tunnel results10.1016/0167-6105(92)90126-U ↗
16. Comparisons between wind tunnel tests on a full aeroelastic model of the proposed bridge over Stretto di Messina and numerical results10.1016/0167-6105(94)00034-B ↗
17. Flutter derivatives identification through full bridge aeroelastic model transfer function analysis10.1016/0167-6105(96)00021-9 ↗
18. Hui, M.C., Larsen, A., and Falbe-Hansen, K. (2004). IABSE Symposium Report, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
19. Full Model Wind Tunnel Study on the Xia-Zhang Bridge Under Operation Stage10.3844/ajeassp.2010.390.395 ↗
20. Wind tunnel study of long-span suspension bridge under smooth and turbulent flow10.1016/0167-6105(90)90046-F ↗
21. On wind resistant properties of Tiger Gate suspension bridge10.12989/was.1998.1.1.067 ↗
22. Flutter and buffeting responses of the Shantou Bay Bridge10.12989/was.2001.4.6.505 ↗
23. Tacoma Narrows 50 years later—Wind engineering investigations for parallel bridges10.1080/1573248042000274551 ↗
24. Flutter and buffeting performances of Third Nanjing Bridge over Yangtze River under yaw wind via aeroelastic model test10.1016/j.jweia.2007.02.019 ↗
25. A case-study of double multi-modal bridge flutter: Experimental result and numerical analysis10.1016/j.jweia.2016.01.004 ↗
26. The influence of topography on the dynamic wind loading of long span bridges10.1016/0167-6105(90)90133-W ↗
27. Bluff body aerodynamics in wind engineering10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.008 ↗
28. Reynolds Number Effects in the Flow around a Bluff Bridge Deck Cross Section10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00075-0 ↗
29. Unsteady RANS simulations of flow around a bridge section10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.010 ↗
30. A method for improving the dynamic response of full bridge reduced-scale models in aeroelastic wind tunnel tests by using optimization algorithms10.1016/j.jweia.2017.04.003 ↗
31. Full Aeroelastic Model Testing for Examining Wind-Induced Vibration of a 5,000 m Spanned Suspension Bridge10.3389/fbuil.2018.00020 ↗
32. Diana, G., Rocchi, D., and Argentini, T. (2015, January 23–25). Buffeting response of long span bridges: Numerical-experimental validation of fluid-structure interaction models. Proceedings of the IABSE Conference: Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges, Geneva, Switzerland.10.2749/222137815818359618 ↗
33. Wind Tunnel Test Study on Pipeline Suspension Bridge via Aeroelastic Model with π Connection10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000333 ↗
34. Wind effects on the Normandie cable-stayed bridge: Comparison between full aeroelastic model tests and quasi-steady analytical approach10.1016/S0167-6105(95)00040-2 ↗
35. Timoshenko, S.P., and Goodierwrited, J.N. (1970). Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill Book Company. [3rd ed.].
36. A survey on the generalized defference method and its application
37. Zhang, X. (2016). Matlab Efficient Solution of Differential Equations: Principle and Realization of Spectral Method, China Machine Press. (In Chinese).
38. Holland, J.H. (1975). Adaptation in Natural and Articial Systems, University of Michigan Press.
39. A comparision between ANSYS optimization and GA in the truss structure
40. Deb, K., and Sundar, J. (2006, January 8–12). Reference Point Based Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO ′06, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/1143997.1144112 ↗