journal article·2023-03-20Open access

Validation of the Implant Stability Test for Implant Provisional Crowns: An In Vitro Study

Yurie Okuhama, Koudai Nagata, Toshifumi Nakashizu, Kana Wakamori, Manabu Okubo, Hayato Tsuruoka, Hiromasa Kawana

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 6

Abstract

Implant treatment has evolved and is now performed using various techniques. However, the osseointegration duration required for poor primary stability or immediate loading is unclear and depends largely on the surgeon’s experience. We sought to verify whether implant stability can be quantified after immediate loading, using AnyCheck®. Six implants were placed in simulated bone blocks classified by bone quality as D1–D4 and further divided into healing abutment and provisional crown groups. The implant stability test (IST) values of both groups were measured using AnyCheck®. All bone qualities from D1 to D4 differed significantly between the provisional crown and healing abutment groups (p < 0.001). In both groups, the IST values were the highest for D1 bone and lowest for D4 bone. There were significant differences in bone quality between the provisional crown and healing abutment groups. The correlations between the groups differed based on bone quality. However, the IST values of both groups differed by a minimum of 4 and maximum of 7. These results suggest that AnyCheck® is useful for quantifying the implant stability after immediate loading. Using an index to quantify the implant and bone stability for immediate loading may shorten treatment duration and increase success rates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental Radiography and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan

Department of Dental Laboratory, Kanagawa Dental University Hospital, Yokosuka 238-8580, Japan

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration10.1155/2016/6285620 ↗
2. Makowiecki, A., Hadzik, J., Błaszczyszyn, A., Gedrange, T., and Dominiak, M. (2019). An evaluation of superhydrophilic surfaces of dental implants—A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0767-8 ↗
3. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis10.1111/clr.13289 ↗
4. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02172.x ↗
5. Efficacy of standard (SLA) and modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) dental implants in promoting immediate and/or early occlusal loading protocols: A systematic review of prospective studies10.1111/clr.12347 ↗
6. Immediate loading: A new implant technique with immediate loading and aesthetics: Nobel Active™
7. Methods used to assess implant stability: Current status
8. Differences in percussion-type measurements of implant stability according to height of healing abutments and measurement angle10.4047/jkap.2018.56.4.278 ↗
9. Okuhama, Y., Nagata, K., Kim, H., Tsuruoka, H., Atsumi, M., and Kawana, H. (2022). Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: A clinical research study. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02320-0 ↗
10. Implant primary stability depending on protocol and insertion mode—An ex vivo study10.1186/s40729-020-00245-3 ↗
11. The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: A short-term randomized controlled clinical trial10.11607/jomi.3022 ↗
12. Density of bone: Effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive bone loading
13. Implant abutment screw torque generated by general dentists using a hand driver in a limited access space simulating the mouth10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[277:IASTGB]2.0.CO;2 ↗
14. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1902/jop.2010.100232 ↗
15. Makary, C., Menhall, A., Zammarie, C., Lombardi, T., Lee, S.Y., Stacchi, C., and Park, K.B. (2019). Primary stability optimization by using fixtures with different thread depth according to bone density: A clinical prospective study on early loaded implants. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12152398 ↗
16. Correlation between implant geometry, implant surface, insertion torque, and primary stability: In vitro biomechanical analysis10.11607/jomi.6285 ↗
17. Resonance frequency analysis of thermal acid-etched, hydrophilic implants during first 3 months of healing and osseointegration in an early-loading protocol10.11607/jomi.3985 ↗
18. Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.1 ↗
19. Mijiritsky, E., Barone, A., Cinar, I.C., Nagy, K., and Shacham, M. (2021). 3D Considerations and outcomes of immediate single implant insertion and provisionalization at the maxillary esthetic one: A long-term retrospective follow-up study of up to 18 years. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10184138 ↗
20. Dental implants with immediate loading using insertion torque of 30 Ncm: A systematic review10.1097/ID.0000000000000444 ↗
21. Immediate function dental implants inserted with less than 30N·cm of torque in full-arch maxillary rehabilitations using the All-on-4 concept: Retrospective study10.1016/j.ijom.2018.04.008 ↗
22. Influence of low insertion torque values on survival rate of immediately loaded dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/jcpe.13733 ↗
23. Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: A comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00322.x ↗
24. Survival rate and potential risk indicators of implant loss in non-smokers and systemically healthy periodontitis patients: An up to 9-year retrospective study10.1111/jre.12854 ↗
25. Immediate loading of single implants inserted flapless with medium or high insertion torque: A 6-month follow-up of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial
26. Immediate versus conventional loading of mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses in edentulous patients: 10-year report of a randomised controlled trial
27. Immediate, early (6 weeks) and delayed loading (3 months) of single, partial and full fixed implant supported prostheses: 1-year post-loading data from a multicentre randomised controlled trial
28. The NobelGuide® All-on-4® treatment concept for rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: A prospective report on medium- and long-term outcomes10.1111/cid.12260 ↗
29. Immediate loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla with a fixed provisional restoration without bone augmentation: A report on 5-year outcomes data obtained from a prospective clinical trial10.11607/jomi.4364 ↗
30. Can the bone density estimated by CBCT predict the primary stability of dental implants? A new measurement protocol10.1097/SCS.0000000000006991 ↗
31. Lim, H.K., Lee, S.J., Jeong, Y., Lee, J.S., Ryu, J.J., Shim, J.S., and Song, I.S. (2022). Clinical Validation of Dental Implant Stability by Newly Designed Damping Capacity Assessment Device during the Healing Period. Medicina, 58.10.3390/medicina58111570 ↗