journal article·2023-01-16Open access

Base Isolation Compared to Capacity Design for Long Corner Periods and Pulse-Type Seismic Records

Dietlinde Köber, Felix Weber, Eugen Lozincă, Viorel Popa

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 2

Abstract

Southern Romania is a geographic region with alluvial deposits. This soil type leads to rather long corner periods and provides as a particularity of the response spectrum an enlarged plateau. These conditions produce large displacement demands. Moreover, pulse-type ground acceleration records make this seismic area more unique. Research on the seismic behaviour of structures built under such unusual conditions is limited and Romanian engineers are not confident to apply alternative solutions such as base isolation. Although capacity design is still the regular design method applied in Romania, modern base isolation solutions may overcome the large displacement demand expectation produced by seismic events and fulfil immediate occupancy requirements. This study presents the seismic performance of an existing hospital from Bucharest, for which two seismic design solutions were applied: (i) classical approach based on capacity design and (ii) base isolation. Both approaches are compared in terms of drift, acceleration and base shear values. Static as well as non-linear dynamic analysis methods were applied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Reinforced Concrete Department, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, Bucharest 020396, Romania

Maurer Switzerland GmbH, 8118 Pfaffhausen, Switzerland

Funding

Stiftung Maurer Söhne

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Pavel, F., Popa, V., and Văcăreanu, R. (2018). Impact of Long-Period Ground Motions on Structural Design:A Case Study for Bucharest, Romania, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-73402-6 ↗
2. Nielsen, G., Rees, S., Dong, B., Chok, K., Fatemi, E., and Zekioglu, A. (2022, November 03). Practical Implementation of ASCE-41 and NLRHA Procedures for the Design of the LLUMC Replacement Hospital. In Proceedings of the 2017 SEAOC Convention Proceedings. Available online: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.seaoc.org/resource/resmgr/Convention_Proceedings/2017/030_PAPER_Nielsen.pdf.
3. Christchurch Women’s Hospital: Performance Analysis of the Base-Isolation System during the Series of Canterbury Earthquakes 2011–201210.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000846 ↗
4. Shaking table tests on the seismic response of slopes to near-fault ground motion
5. Effects of near-fault ground motions on dynamic response of slopes based on shaking table model tests10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106869 ↗
6. Lewis, S. (2022, November 03). The 10 largest Base-Isolated Buildings in the World. In ENR Engineering News-Record. Available online: https://www.enr.com/articles/42366-the-10-largest-base-isolated-buildings-in-the-world.
7. Mayes, R., Aiken, I., and Taylor, A. (2019). Revisiting Earthquake Lessons-Base Isolated Buildings, Structural Engineers Association of California.
8. Editorial: Recent Advances and Applications of Seismic Isolation and Energy Dissipation Devices10.3389/fbuil.2020.00126 ↗
9. Arranz, M., Braun, C., and Huber, P. (2017). Seismic protection of the Eskisehir city hospital in Turkey. 39th IABSE Symposium, Engineering the Future.10.2749/vancouver.2017.2219 ↗
10. Moehle, J. (2014). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, McGraw-Hill Education.
11. Naeim, F. (2001). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures. The Seismic Design Handbook, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-1693-4 ↗
12. Pitilakis, K. (2018). Analysis in Seismic Provisions for Buildings: Past, Present and Future. Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering in Europe. ECEE 2018. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, Springer.
13. Postelnicu, T., and Damian, I. (2012). Proiectarea Structurilor de Beton Armat in Zone Seismice, MarLink.
14. Base-isolation systems for the seismic retrofitting of r.c. framed buildings with soft-storey subjected to near-fault earthquakes10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.025 ↗
15. Reddy, G., Muruva, H., and Verma, A. (2019). Seismic Base Isolation of Structures. Textbook of Seismic Design, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-3176-3 ↗
16. Sorace, S., and Terenzi, G. (2014). Analysis, Design and Construction of Base-Isolated Multiple Building Structure. Adv. Civ. Eng., 2014.10.1155/2014/585429 ↗
17. Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Curved Surface Slider Systems under Harmoinc, Near-Fault and Long-Period Ground Motions10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001825 ↗
18. (2013). Romanian Seismic Design Code Part I. Design Regulations for Buildings (Standard No. P100-1/2013).
19. (2006). Romanian Seismic Design Code Part I. Design Regulations for Buildings (Standard No. P100-1/2006).
20. Investigation on site-specific seismic response analysis for Bucharest10.1007/s10518-020-00789-0 ↗
21. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and sensitivity analysis: A case of joint consideration of intermediate-depth (Vrancea) and shallow (crustal) seismicity10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.004 ↗
22. Characterization of site conditions for selected seismic stations in eastern part of Romania10.1007/s11600-018-0117-2 ↗
23. Wilson, L.E. (2000). Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures, Computers and Structures Inc.
24. Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part I: Problem definition10.1002/stc.99 ↗
25. Spacone, E., Camata, G., and Faggella, M. (2007). Nonlinear models and nonlinear procedures for seismic analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures. Computational Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, CRC Press.
26. Köber, D., Aldea, A., Enache, R., Weber, F., and Semrau, P. (2019, January 27–29). Measured and computed dynamic characteristics of a hospital building in Bucharest. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures, Potsdam, Germany.
27. Saitta, F., Clemente, P., Buffarini, G., Bongiovanni, G., Salvatori, A., and Grossi, C. (2018). Base Isolation of Buildings with Curved Surface Sliders: Basic Design Criteria and Critical Issues. Adv. Civ. Eng., 2018.10.1155/2018/1569683 ↗
28. Weber, F., Meier, L., Distl, J., and Braun, C. (2018). Optimum design of curved surface sliders based on site-specific seismic input and its sensitivity. Geosciences, 8.10.20944/preprints201801.0199.v1 ↗
29. CSI (2013). ETABS Integrated Building Design Software, Computers and Structures.
30. Köber, D., Semrau, P., and Weber, F. (2022). Design approach for an irregular hospital building in Bucharest. Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures IV, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-83221-6_4 ↗
31. CSI (2006). Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D structures, version 4. CSI Perform-3D User Guide, Computers and Structures.
32. (2004). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1/2004).
33. The 1985 Mexico Earthquake (PDF)
34. (2005). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-3:2005).
35. (2011). Anti-Seismic Devices (Standard No. EN 15129:2010-06).
36. (2019). Romanian Seismic Design Code Part III. Regulations for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings. (Standard No. P100-3/2019).
37. Maurer, S.E. (2022, November 03). Technical Specifications for Double Curved Surface Sliders. Available online: https://maurer.eu.