The Relationships between Organizational Factors and Systems Engineering Process Performance in Launching Space Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
The launch vehicle industry has long been considered a pioneering industry in systems engineering. Launch vehicles are large complex systems that require a methodical multi-disciplinary approach to design, build, and launch. Launch vehicles are used to deliver payloads—such as humans, robotic science missions, or national security payloads—to desired locations in space. Previous research has identified deficient or underperforming systems engineering as a leading contributor to launch vehicle failures. Launch vehicle failures can negatively affect national security, the economy, science, and society, thus highlighting the importance of understanding the factors that influence systems engineering in launch vehicle organizations in the United States. The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate the relationships between organizational factors and systems engineering process performance. Structural equation modeling was used to develop a model of the relationships of these factors and test hypotheses. The results showed that organizational commitment, top management support, the perceived value of systems engineering, and systems engineering support significantly influence systems engineering process performance in the launch vehicle industry. Implications of this study for improving the performance of systems engineering in launch vehicle organizations are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications · Technology Assessment and Management · Space exploration and regulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Launch Services Program at Kennedy Space Center, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899, USA
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
Kern Technology Group, Virginia Beach, VA 23462, USA
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. FAA (2016). Origins of the Commercial Space Industry, FAA.
2. Launch vehicle systems engineering life-cycle evolution and comparison10.1002/sys.21485 ↗
3. Pawlikowski, E.M. (2010). Mission Assurance—A Key Part of Space, NRO. Senior Leader Perspective: 2010.
4. Sauvageau, D.R., and Allen, B.D. (1998, January 13–15). Launch Vehicle Historical Reliability. Proceedings of the 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Cleveland, OH, USA.10.2514/6.1998-3979 ↗
5. Gydesen, P.W. (2006). What Is the Impact to National Security without Commercial Space Applications, Air University.
6. Failure-space—A systems engineering look at 50 space system failures10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00071-6 ↗
7. BKCASE Editorial Board (2022). Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), v. 2.7, R.J Cloutier (Editor in Chief), The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology.
8. Systems Engineering—A Restrospective View10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1998)1:4<258::AID-SYS2>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
9. INCOSE (2011). Systems Engineering Handbook, INCOSE.
10. NASA (2007). NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, Administration.
11. Gibson, D.K. (2019). Factors Affecting Systems Engineering in Launch Vehicle Organizations. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida.
12. NASA (2012). Launch Services Risk Mitigation Policy for NASA-Owned and/or NASA-Sponsored Payloads/Missions, Administration.
13. USAF, NRO, and NASA (2011). Memorandum of Understanding between USAF, NRO & NASA for New Entrant Launch Vehicle Certification.
14. Gill, P.S., Garcia, D., and Vaughan, W.W. (2005, January 10–13). Engineering Lessons Learned and Systems Engineering Applications. Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada.10.2514/6.2005-1325 ↗
15. Investigation of space launch vehicle catastrophic failures10.2514/3.26741 ↗
16. Harland, D.M., and Lorenz, R. (2005). Space Systems Failures: Disasters and Rescues of Satellites, Rocket and Space Probes, Praxis. [1st ed.].
17. Isakowitz, S.J., Hopkins, J.B., and Hopkins, J. (2004). International Reference Guide to Space Launch Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [4th ed.].10.2514/4.475917 ↗
18. Leung, R. (2014). The Effect of Mission Assurance on ELV Launch Success Rate: An Analysis of Two Management Systems for Launch Vehicles. The School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University.
19. Gruhl, W. (1992). Lessons Learned, Cost/Schedule Assessment Guide, NASA Headquaters.
20. Honour, E.C. (2004). Understanding the Value of Systems Engineering, INCOSE.
21. Kludze, A.-K.K.P. (2004). Engineering of Complex Systems: The Impact of Systems Engineering at NASA, The George Washington University.
22. Systems engineering metrics and applications in product development- A critical literature review and agenda for further research10.1002/sys.20089 ↗
23. Malek, K. (1996). A Case Study in Product Development: The 1984-199x Chevrolet Corvette, MIT Industrial Performance Center.
24. Honour, E.C. (2010). Systems Engineering Return on Investment. 20th annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering INCOSE, INCOSE.10.1002/j.2334-5837.2010.tb01150.x ↗
25. A new framework for determining critical success failure factors in projects 199610.1016/0263-7863(95)00064-X ↗
26. Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.07.004 ↗
27. Critical success factors in projects10.1108/17538371211269040 ↗
28. An empirical study on the critical success factors of small- to medium-sized projects
29. Refining the search for project success factors: A multivariate, typological approach
30. Critical Factors in Successful Project Implementation10.1109/TEM.1987.6498856 ↗
31. The Project Excellence Model: Linking success criteria and critical success factors10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00112-6 ↗
32. Board, B.E. (2016). Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology.
33. Blair, J.C., Ryan, R.S., and Schutzenhofer, L.A. (2011). Lessons Learned in Engineering, NASA.
34. Pennell, L.W., and Knight, F.L. (2005). USAF-Aerospace Corp Systems Engineering Handbook, USAF.
35. ISO (2007). ISO/IEC Standard for Systems Engineering-Application and Management of the Systems Engineering Process. ISO/IEC 26702 IEEE Std 1220-2005 First Edition 2007-07-15, IEEE.
36. EIA (1999). Processes for Engineering a System, EIA.
37. IEEE (2008). Systems and Software Engineering-System Life Cycle Processes, IEEE.
38. SEI (2010). Capability Maturity Model Integrated for Development, SEI.
39. Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering10.1002/sys.20161 ↗
40. Valerdi, R. (2005). The Constructive Systems Engineering Cost Model (COSYSMO), University of Southern California.
41. Elm, J.P., and Goldenson, D.R. (2012). The Business Case for Systems Engineering Study-Results of Effectiveness Survey, SEI.10.21236/ADA610517 ↗
42. Son, S.K., and Kim, S.-K. (2012). The Impact of Systems Engineering on Program Performance: A Case Study of the Boeing Company in Computer Science and its Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5699-1_54 ↗
43. Bruff, R.S. (2008). Systems Engineering Best Practices as Measures for Successful Outcomes in Selected United States Defense Industry Aerospace Programs, Walden University.
44. Componation, P.J., Utley, D.R., Farrington, P.A., and Youngblood, A.D. (2009, January 30). Assessing the Relationships between Project Success and Systems Engineering Processes at NASA. Proceedings of the 2009 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Miami, FL, USA.
45. Measuring Organic and Mechanistic Cultures10.1080/10429247.2001.11415132 ↗
46. Abrahamsson, P. (2000, January 5–7). Is Management Commitement a Necessity After All in Software Process Improvement? In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 26th Euromicro Conference. EUROMICRO 2000. Informatics: Inventing the Future. Maastricht, The Netherlands.
47. The Relationship between Organizational Culture and the Deployment of Systems Development Methodologies10.2307/25148780 ↗
48. Carroll, E. (2016). Systems Engineering Cultural Transformation. Socorro Systems Summit, INCOSE.
49. NASA (2003). Columbia Accident Investigation Report.
50. Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007 ↗
51. Paradigm lost: Reinvigorating the study of organizational culture
52. Alnoaimi, M. (2015). Safety Climate and Safety Outcomes in Aircraft Maintenance: A Mediating Effect of Employee Turnover and Safety Motivation. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida.
53. The Role of Organizational and Individual Variables in Aircraft Maintenance Performance
54. Alsowayigh, M. (2014). Assessing safety culture among pilots in Saudi Airlines: Quantitative Study Approach. Industrial Engineering and Management System, University of Central Florida.
55. Mueller, C.W. (2004). Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Measurement: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, Sage Publications.
56. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications. [4th ed.].
57. A framework for assisting the design of effective software process improvement implementation strategies10.1016/j.jss.2004.09.001 ↗
58. Stam, L. (2001). The Robustness of LISREL Modeling Revisited. Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future: A Festschrift in Honor of Karl Joreskog, Scientific Software International, Inc.
59. Fabrigar, L.R., and Wegener, D.T. (2011). Exploratory Factor Analysis, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199734177.001.0001 ↗
60. Kline, R. (2011). Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling, The Guilford Press. [3rd ed.].
61. Centre, S.S. (2001). Approches to the Analysis of Survey Data, The University of Reading.
62. Principles of Survey Research Part 6: Data Analysis10.1145/638750.638758 ↗
63. Byrne, B.M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with Amos, Routledge. [3rd ed.].10.4324/9781315757421 ↗
64. Hair, J.F. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson. [7th ed.].
65. Hoyle, R. (2012). Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, The Guilford Press.
66. Tabachnick, B.G., and Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics, Pearson. [6th ed.].
67. Schumacker, R.E., and Lomax, R.G. (2010). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, Routledge. [3rd ed.].