Empirical Attenuation Law for Air Blast Waves Due to the Detonation of Explosives Outdoors
Source abstract
Abstract
The detonation of explosives in the open air was studied, analyzing different amounts of explosives detonated at different distances, monitoring the overpressure or air blast wave generated with the aim of determining a model, which allows to establish safety zones. A series of tests measuring the air wave with different loads and sensors placed at various distances from the origin of the explosion were carried out. The work was focused on designing full-scale trials that allowed to develop a predictive empirical method based on the calculation model of the equivalent mass of TNT. A total of 18 different gelatinous dynamite charges, placing the sensor at six different distances from the origin of the explosion, produced a total of 90 tests measuring the air wave produced by the detonation of gelatinous dynamite. Later, the outdoor detonation of 10 TNT explosive charges was analyzed to extend the model and improve its scope. With all this, it has been possible to develop a predictive model that allows assessing the overpressure generated by the detonation of a TNT-equivalent explosive charge. The results are useful to predict the air blast wave in common open-air blasts, such as those carried out with shaped charges to demolish metallic structures. On the other hand, the results are also useful to determine the air blast wave overpressure in the case of large explosive charges detonated in the open air, such as accidental explosive detonation or terrorist bombs. It is important to point out the relevance of the results achieved after the detonation of large explosive charges (more than 80 kg) simulating a type of bomb frequently used by terrorists. Reproducing the explosion on a real scale, the results are fully representative of the overpressure produced by an explosion of these characteristics without the need of extrapolating the results of tests with small loads. In addition, the detonation was carried out with TNT, which can serve as a standard to compare with any other type of explosive.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Combustion and Detonation Processes · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mining Exploitation and Prospecting, School of Mining, Energy and Materials Engineering, University of Oviedo, Independencia 13, 33004 Oviedo, Spain
Funding
Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Baker, W.E. (1973). Explosions in Air, University of Texas Press.
2. Baker, W.E., Cox, P.A., Westine, P.S., Kulesz, J.J., and Strehlow, R.A. (1983). Explosion Hazards and Evaluation, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
3. Henrych, J. (1979). The Dynamics of Explosion and Its Use, Elsevier.
4. Kingery, C.N., and Bulmash, G. (1984). Airblast Parameters from TNT Spherical Air Burst and Hemispherical Surface Burst, U.S. Army BRL. Technical Report ARBRL-TR-02555.
5. Kinney, G.F., and Graham, K.J. (1985). Explosive Shocks in Air, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-86682-1 ↗
6. Mills, C.A. (1987, January 27–30). The design of concrete structures to resist explosions and weapon effects. Proceedings of the 1st InternationalConference on Concrete for Hazard Protections, Edinburgh, UK.
7. Sadovskiy, M.A. (2004). Mechanical effects of air shockwaves from explosions according to experiments. Geophysics and Physics of Explosion, Nauka Press. Selected Works.
8. Modelling of blast loading on aboveground structures—I. General phenomenology and external blast10.1016/0045-7949(94)90066-3 ↗
9. Brode, H.L. (1955). Numerical Solution of Spherical Blast Waves, American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.1722085 ↗
10. A review of methods for predicting bomb blast effects on buildings
11. Koccaz, Z., Sutcu, F., and Torunbalci, N. (2008, January 12–17). Architectural and structural design for blast resistant structures. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
12. Blast loading on structures
13. Characteristics of wave recorded in small scale field blast tests in a layered rocksoil medium10.1680/geot.2003.53.6.587 ↗
14. Cranz, C. (1926). Lehrbuch der Ballistic, Springer.
15. A Critical Review of Blast Wave Parameters and Approaches for Blast Load Mitigation10.1007/s11831-020-09436-y ↗
16. Filice, A., Mynarz, M., and Zinno, R. (2022). Experimental and Empirical Study for Prediction of Blast Loads. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052691 ↗
17. Prediction of far-field blast loads from large TNT-equivalent explosives on gabled frames10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107120 ↗
18. Siskind, D.E., Stachura, V.J., Stagg, M.S., and Kopp, J.W. (1980). Structure Response and Damage Produced by Airblast from Surface Minin, Report of Investigation 8485.
19. Richards, A.B., and Moore, A.J. (2002, January 11–15). Airblast design concepts in open pit mines. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting–Fragblast 7, Beijing, China.
20. Operational and geological parameters in the assessing blast induced airblast-overpressure in quarries10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.06.004 ↗
21. (2008). UFC 3-340-02. Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions, Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), Manual Number 3-340-02 (This Manual Supersedes US ARMY TM5-1300).
22. Karlos, V., and Solomos, G. (2013). Calculation of Blast Loads for Application to Structural Components, European Union. JRC Technical Report EUR 26456EN.