journal article·2022-07-15Open access

A New Grey Target Evaluation Method of Science and Technology Talents Considering ‘Dominant-Implicit’ Reference Points

Lin Jiang, Jianjun Zhu

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

This paper studies the grey target evaluation model of science and technology talents by drawing on the ‘dominant-implicit’ double reference point. Input and output perspectives are adopted and developed to establish a dominant reference point for the evaluation of science and technology talents, which takes into account the ‘Peer-Status quo’ and ‘Baseline-History’, as well as an implicit reference point, such as the ‘Expectation-Opportunity’ and ‘Goal-Preference’. The framework of the grey target evaluation model for science and technology talents is then constructed and given a dual reference (dominant–implicit). The spherical grey target on the maximum, minimum and arithmetic mean values of the target effect measure values of each reference point is established to determine the reference point weight under the input and output indicators. This research will contribute to the comprehensive effect measure value and the ranking of results that relate to science and technology talents and will demonstrate that its applied method is feasible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Grey System Theory Applications · Advanced Technologies in Various Fields · Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Engineering, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224002, China

College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Jiangsu Province Education Reform and Development Strategic and Policy Research Major Project · Basic Science (Natural Science) Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution · Philosophy and Social Science Project of Jiangsu Provincial Education Department

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Does international talent promote innovation performance of latecomer firms? Empirical investigation into mainland Chinese firms in the Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone, Shanghai10.1080/19761597.2020.1836976 ↗
2. An Empirical Study on Talent Management Strategies of Knowledge-Based Organizations Using Entrepreneurial Psychology and Key Competence
3. Digitalization and its Impact on the Future Role of SCM Executives in Talent Management—An International Cross-Industry Delphi Study10.1111/jbl.12259 ↗
4. An exploration on the flow of leading research talents in China: From the perspective of distinguished young scholars10.1007/s11192-020-03562-x ↗
5. Impact of Social Media on the Firm’s Knowledge Exploration and Knowledge Exploitation: The Role of Business Analytics Talent
6. Strategy and performance of Russian firms: An organisational capabilities perspective10.1504/EJIM.2021.111913 ↗
7. Research on technology innovation risk evaluation of high-tech enterprises based on fuzzy evaluation10.3233/JIFS-179758 ↗
8. Sun, C.C. (2021). Evaluating the Intertwined Relationships of the Drivers for University Technology Transfer. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11209668 ↗
9. The cultivation mechanism of green technology innovation in manufacturing industry: From the perspective of ecological niche10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119711 ↗
10. Artificial Intelligence and emerging digital technologies in the energy sector10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117615 ↗
11. What Makes a Nobel Prize Innovator? Early Growth Experiences and Personality Traits
12. Yu, S., and Yuizono, T. (2021). A Proximity Approach to Understanding University-Industry Collaborations for Innovation in Non-Local Context: Exploring the Catch-Up Role of Regional Absorptive Capacity. Sustainability., 13.10.3390/su13063539 ↗
13. Zhang, Z.S., Liu, M., and Yang, Q. (2021). Examining the External Antecedents of Innovative Work Behavior: The Role of Government Support for Talent Policy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 18.10.3390/ijerph18031213 ↗
14. Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china’s manufacturing sectors10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120142 ↗
15. Jiang, X.M., Zheng, C.Y., and Zhang, W.J. (2020). Coupling between Carbon Efficiency and Technology Absorptive Capacity—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12198010 ↗
16. Cooperation and Competition in the Innovation Ecosystem From the Perspective of Evolutionary Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769847 ↗
17. Human resources analytics: A systematization of research topics and directions for future research
18. Stakeholder engagement and firms’ innovation: Evidence from LGBT-supportive policies10.1002/csr.2150 ↗
19. Analysis on the International Competitiveness of China’s Trade in Services10.1080/1540496X.2019.1611558 ↗
20. Building dynamic service analytics capabilities for the digital marketplace10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.016 ↗
21. Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk10.2307/1914185 ↗
22. Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty
23. Reconciling Loss Aversion and Gain Seeking in Judged Emotions10.1177/0963721421992043 ↗
24. A dynamic grey target evaluation method with multiple reference points for new R&D institution performance10.3233/JIFS-190602 ↗
25. Intertemporal preference with loss aversion: Consumption and risk-attitude10.1016/j.jet.2021.105380 ↗
26. A theory of reference point formation
27. Social Image Concern and Reference Point Formation10.1515/bejte-2018-0075 ↗
28. Numerical Feedback Roundness Affects the Choice of the Self vs. Others as a Reference Point10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758990 ↗
29. Reference points for business model innovation in social purpose organizations: A stakeholder perspective10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.032 ↗
30. Ruiz, F., and Cabello, J.M. (2021). MRP-PCI: A Multiple Reference Point Based Partially Compensatory Composite Indicator for Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13031261 ↗
31. A new multi-objective intelligent weighted grey target decision model
32. Decision Making Model of Multi-attribute Interval Grey Number Based on the Distance of General Consistency
33. A Novel Grey Target Decision Method Based on a Cobweb Area Model for Standard Interval Grey Numbers
34. Multi-attribute Group Grey Target Decision-making Method Based on Three-parameter Interval Grey Number
35. Study on Incidence Decision Making Model of Multi-Attribute Interval Number
36. Optimal trade-offs in decision-making for sustainability and resilience in manufacturing supply chains
37. Application of cumulative prospect theory in understanding energy retrofit decision: A study of homeowners in the Netherlands
38. Constructing an ethical framework for priority allocation of pandemic vaccines10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.053 ↗
39. Solving MDVRP with Grey Delivery Time based on Improved Quantum Evolutionary Algorithm
40. A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.011 ↗