journal article·2022-07-07Open access

In Vitro Evaluation of the Strength of Dentin Replacement in Complex Posterior Tooth Restoration

Nurhayaty Natsir, Farida Rahim, Juni Jekti Nugroho, Christine Anastasia Rovani, Syamsiah Syam, Muhammad Ruslin, Takashi Saito, Keng-Liang Ou

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

Due to the increasing interest in direct restoration, there is a need to address the shortcomings of these restorations, mainly by increasing the longevity of complex direct restorations. The present study aimed to evaluate the tensile strength differences in the complex restoration of posterior teeth with dentin replacement constructed by fiber and non-fiber materials. The samples were extracted from the mandibular permanent-molar and prepared using a complex cavity. The cavity was subsequently restored with the centripetal incremental technique using a nano-fill composite and different base materials, namely fiber dentin replacement, non-fiber dentin replacement, and flowable composite. The universal testing machine was used to consider the tensile strength and the fracture patterns were assessed using stereomicroscopy, followed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) examination. The data were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. No significant differences were noted in the tensile strength of the three base materials. By using stereomicroscopy and SEM, the adhesive fracture patterns were observed more clearly in the cavities with fiber-based dentin replacement, whereas mixed fracture patterns were evident in cavities with non-fiber dentin replacement and flowable composite bases. The results indicated that the addition of fiber in dentin replacement did not affect the tensile strength in the complex restoration. Therefore, dentin replacement of both fiber and non-fiber materials is applicable as a base material for complex restoration of the posterior tooth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Erosion and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia

Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar 90231, Indonesia

Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia

Division of Clinical Cariology and Endodontology, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Tobetsu 061-0293, Japan

3D Global Biotech Inc. (Spin-Off Company from Taipei Medical University), New Taipei City 221, Taiwan

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Contemporary management of tooth replacement in the traumatized dentition10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01122.x ↗
2. Repair versus replacement of defective direct dental restorations in posterior teeth of adults10.1308/205016814812143969 ↗
3. Minimally invasive direct restorations: A practical guide10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.661 ↗
4. A new classification system for the restoration of root filled teeth10.1111/iej.12847 ↗
5. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: A prospective 8 years follow up10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.021 ↗
6. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.003 ↗
7. The Effect of Polymerization Methods and Fiber Types on the Mechanical Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Resin-Based Composites10.1111/jopr.12587 ↗
8. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262 ↗
9. Direct versus indirect inlay/onlay composite restorations in posterior teeth. A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.011 ↗
10. Short fiber reinforced composite: A new alternative for direct onlay restorations10.2174/1874210601307010181 ↗
11. Low-shrinkage composites: An in vitro evaluation of sealing ability after occlusal loading
12. Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: A literature review10.5395/rde.2021.46.e18 ↗
13. Effect of preheating on polymerization shrinkage strain of BIS-GMA free and containing resin composite restorative materials (in vitro study)10.1186/s42269-022-00741-z ↗
14. A Review of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress: Current Techniques for Posterior Direct Resin Restorations10.5005/jcdp-7-4-79 ↗
15. The effect of curing intensity on mechanical properties of different bulk-fill composite resins10.2147/CCIDE.S130085 ↗
16. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials10.1177/0022034510381263 ↗
17. Sakaguchi, R.L., and Powers, J.M. (2012). Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials, Elsevier Mosby. [13th ed.].
18. Mechanical Properties of SDR™ and Biodentine™ as Dentin Replacement Materials: An In Vitro Study10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3281 ↗
19. Ausiello, P., Dal Piva, A.M.d.O., Borges, A.L.S., Lanzotti, A., Zamparini, F., Epifania, E., and Mendes Tribst, J.P. (2021). Effect of Shrinking and No Shrinking Dentine and Enamel Replacing Materials in Posterior Restoration: A 3D-FEA Study. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052215 ↗
20. Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: In vitro study10.1155/2015/701262 ↗
21. Influence of composite insertion technique on gap formation10.4103/0972-0707.173205 ↗
22. Influence of Composite Insertion Techniques (Bulk-fill and Incremental Nanofilled Composites) on Adaptability to the Pulpal Floor and Interfacial Gap Formation10.5005/jp-journals-10052-0112 ↗
23. The effect of a new-generation flowable composite resin on microleakage in Class V composite restorations as an intermediate layer10.4103/0972-0707.111311 ↗
24. Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage—An in vitro study
25. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations10.3109/23337931.2015.1017576 ↗
26. Mechanical properties, volumetric shrinkage and depth of cure of short fiber-reinforced resin composite10.4012/dmj.2015-280 ↗
27. Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth10.1155/2022/6643825 ↗
28. Comparative Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Resins10.4236/ojcm.2014.42013 ↗
29. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite10.2341/15-320-L ↗
30. A review of dental composites: Challenges, chemistry aspects, filler influences, and future insights10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108852 ↗
31. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive And Flexural Strength of Newer Nanocomposite Materials with Conventional Hybrid Composites—An Invitro Study
32. The Effects of Cavity Preparation and Composite Resin on Bond Strength and Stress Distribution Using the Microtensile Bond Test10.2341/16-338-L ↗
33. Effect of fiber reinforcement on color stability and degree of polymerization of different composite resins10.4103/jorr.jorr_27_20 ↗
34. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber composite used as a core material-An in vitro study10.1016/j.jpor.2017.02.001 ↗
35. Glass fiber-reinforced composites in dentistry10.1186/s42269-021-00650-7 ↗
36. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration10.4103/JCD.JCD_157_16 ↗
37. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2205 ↗
38. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with bulk fill, packable and fiber reinforced composites
39. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique10.1016/j.jdent.2015.09.007 ↗
40. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with extensive MOD cavities restored with different composite restorations (An In vitro study)10.12816/0015139 ↗
41. Bond Strength of a Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Class II MOD Cavities
42. Effect of Four Different Placement Techniques on Marginal Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations: An in vitro Study10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1066 ↗
43. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolar Teeth with Extensive MOD Cavities Restored with Different Bulk Fill Composite Restorations (An In vitro Study)
44. Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations10.1155/2010/728453 ↗
45. Conversion degree of indirect resin composites and effect of thermocycling on their physical properties10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00551.x ↗