journal article·2022-06-20Open access

Wear Analysis of Four Different Single-File Reciprocating Instruments before and after Four Uses in Simulated Root Canals

Alessio Zanza, Rodolfo Reda, Giuseppe Familiari, Stefania Annarita Nottola, Dario Di Nardo, Luca Testarelli, Orlando Donfrancesco

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 12

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the surface alterations of four reciprocating instruments before and after the shaping of four resin-simulated root canals. The following four different reciprocating instruments are selected: 10 Reciproc Blue (RB25), 10 WaveOne Gold (WOG), 10 EdgeOne Fire (EOF) and 10 recently introduced instruments OneRECI (OR), for a total of 40 new instruments. Before root canal shaping, each instrument is mounted on a stub in a standardized position and observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to detect any surface alteration, such as microfractures, metal defects, deformations, blunt and disruption of cutting edges, debris, pitting and tip flattening. Micrographs are acquired at the level of the tip, 4 mm, 8 mm and 12 mm from it. After that, each instrument is used in four simulated resin root canals. SEM observation was repeated after the simulated clinical use to assess the wear resistance of the instruments. Surface alterations are registered before and after instrumentation and statistical analysis is performed using a Chi-Square test to verify homogeneity of defects distribution and GLM to evaluate the differences of RMS at baseline and after use for both groups (α level 0.05). Before simulated clinical uses, no alterations are found except for three cases of EOF with metal strips in correspondence to the tip, disruption of the cutting edge of WOG and oily spotting on two different OR. After simulated clinical use, EOF shows a statistically significant difference in terms of spiral distortion and flattening of the cutting edges. The OR shows the highest presence of debris despite the ultrasonic cleaning procedures. No instrument fractures are observed. EOF should be discarded after four clinical uses and carefully inspected after each insertion into root canals. Moreover, tough attention should be paid during disinfection and cleaning procedures after instrumentation considering the copious debris detected in each instrument, particularly in OR.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dental Trauma and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 06, 00161 Rome, Italy

Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Section of Human Anatomy, Sapienza University of Rome, Via A. Borelli 50, 00161 Rome, Italy

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Current Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Preparation: A Comprehensive Review-Part I: Historic Perspectives and Current Applications10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.014 ↗
2. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments10.1111/iej.12432 ↗
3. Current Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Preparation: A Comprehensive Review—Part II: Properties and Effectiveness10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.018 ↗
4. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments?10.1111/iej.12166 ↗
5. Clinical fracture incidence of rotary and reciprocating NiTi files: A systematic review and meta-regression10.1111/aej.12484 ↗
6. Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.002 ↗
7. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc Blue and Reciproc10.1111/iej.13214 ↗
8. Influence of clinical operative technique on debris extrusion of two reciprocating files10.1590/pboci.2021.114 ↗
9. Zanza, A., D’Angelo, M., Reda, R., Gambarini, G., Testarelli, L., and Di Nardo, D. (2021). An Update on Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Endodontics: Mechanical Characteristics, Testing and Future Perspective—An Overview. Bioengineering, 8.10.3390/bioengineering8120218 ↗
10. Zanza, A., Seracchiani, M., Reda, R., Miccoli, G., Testarelli, L., and Di Nardo, D. (2022). Metallurgical Tests in Endodontics: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering, 9.10.3390/bioengineering9010030 ↗
11. Wear and metallographic analysis of WaveOne and reciproc NiTi instruments before and after three uses in root canals10.1002/sca.21150 ↗
12. Microstructural, microchemical, and mechanical changes associated with the clinical reuse of two nickel-titanium endodontic instruments10.4103/1735-3327.318943 ↗
13. Metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments10.1007/s10266-013-0113-6 ↗
14. A new method for the assessment of the surface topography of NiTi rotary instruments10.1111/iej.12707 ↗
15. A Paradigm Shift for Torsional Stiffness of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: A Finite Element Analysis10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.017 ↗
16. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01143.x ↗
17. Present status and future directions: Vertical root fractures in root filled teeth10.1111/iej.13737 ↗
18. Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments: An In Vitro Comparison (Torsional Resistance of Two Heat-Treated Reciprocating Files)10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3081 ↗
19. Mechanical Properties of ProTaper Gold, EdgeTaper Platinum, Flex Gold and Pro-T Rotary Systems
20. Effect of Flexural Stress on Torsional Resistance of NiTi Instruments10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.011 ↗
21. Zanza, A., Seracchiani, M., Reda, R., Di Nardo, D., Gambarini, G., and Testarelli, L. (2021). Role of the crystallographic phase of NiTi rotary instruments in determining their torsional resistance during different bending conditions. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14216324 ↗
22. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments according to the Angle of File Access and Radius of Root Canal10.1016/j.joen.2019.11.015 ↗
23. Di Nardo, D., Zanza, A., Seracchiani, M., Donfrancesco, O., Gambarini, G., and Testarelli, L. (2021). Angle of Insertion and Torsional Resistance of Nickel–Titanium Rotary Instruments. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14133744 ↗