journal article·2022-01-29Open access

Evaluation of Skeletal, Dentoalveolar, and Sagittal Airway Changes Induced by the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA) in Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Controlled Study on Lateral Cephalograms

Maria Denisa Statie, Debora Franceschi, Felicita Pierleoni, Valeria Barone, Nenad Popovic, Cosimo Nardi, Lorenzo Franchi, Veronica Giuntini

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in skeletal, dentoalveolar, and airway dimensions induced by the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. A group of 24 Class II patients treated with MARA was evaluated with lateral cephalograms at the start (13.8 ± 2 years) and at the end of treatment (15.7 ± 1.9 years) and compared with a matched untreated Class II group of 20 subjects selected from the archive of the AOOF Legacy. Statistical comparisons were performed with the Student’s t-test. No significant differences were observed for the sagittal airway dimensions. The MARA group showed a significant improvement of Wits (−1.4 mm; p = 0.009) and ANB angle (−0.6°; p = 0.038), a reduction in the overjet (−1.9 mm; p = 0.001), of the overbite (−1.5 mm; p = 0.005), an improvement of molar relationship (1.8 mm; p = 0.000) and a proclination of the lower incisors (2.7°; p = 0.012). During active treatment, MARA did not produce significant favorable changes in the sagittal airway dimensions in Class II subjects when compared with untreated controls. Clinically, these findings highlighted that MARA was able to provide an effective correction of Class II malocclusion with favorable dentoskeletal changes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy

Independent Researcher, 50100 Florence, Italy

Orthodontic Practice Popovic & Colleagues, Kronberger Straße 10, 65812 Bad Soden, Germany

Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age
2. A comparison study of upper airway among different skeletal craniofacial patterns in nonsnoring Chinese children10.2319/030809-130.1 ↗
3. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: A double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.015 ↗
4. Craniofacial and upper airway morphology in pediatric sleep-disordered breathing: Systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.08.021 ↗
5. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.015 ↗
6. Facial profile shape, malocclusion and palatal morphology in Malay obstructive sleep apnea patients10.2319/011509-26.1 ↗
7. Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing in children: New controversies, new directions10.1016/S0272-5231(03)00024-8 ↗
8. Obstructive sleep disordered breathing in 2- to 18-year-old children: Diagnosis and management10.1183/13993003.00385-2015 ↗
9. Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion may be effective to prevent the potential for OSAHS and snoring10.1016/j.mehy.2009.05.041 ↗
10. Changes in airway dimensions following functional appliances in growing patients with skeletal class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.009 ↗
11. Changes in upper airway dimensions following orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with twin block appliance: A systematic review10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19028 ↗
12. Changes in the oropharyngeal airway of Class II patients treated with the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance10.2319/042915-295.1 ↗
13. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005 ↗
14. Evaluation of sagittal airway dimensions after face mask therapy with rapid maxillary expansion in Class III growing patients10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109794 ↗
15. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: A comparative study of Dahlberg’s formula10.1093/ejo/cjr010 ↗
16. Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the mandibular advancement repositioning appliance; A controlled clinical study10.2319/111010-656.1 ↗
17. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior
18. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion10.1007/s00056-007-0656-7 ↗
19. Use of controls in clinical trials10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.10.018 ↗
20. Age-specific size of the normal adenoid pad on magnetic resonance imaging10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00381.x ↗
21. Age-specific size of the upper airway structures in children during development10.1177/000348941011900807 ↗
22. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010 ↗
23. Linear dimensions of the upper airway structure during development: Assessment by magnetic resonance imaging10.1164/ajrccm.165.1.2107140 ↗
24. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances alone or in combination with multibracket appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.2319/102813-790.1 ↗
25. Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion10.1093/ejo/cjs023 ↗
26. Evaluation of the oropharyngeal airway space in class II malocclusion treated with mandibular activator: A retrospective study10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2856 ↗
27. Angle Class II correction with MARA appliance10.1590/S2176-94512013000100011 ↗