journal article·2025-11-26Open access

Investigating the Role of Plastic and Poroelastoplastic Effects in Wellbore Strengthening Using a Fully Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Model

Ernestos N. Sarris, Elias Gravanis

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 23

Abstract

Wellbore instability during drilling in soft formations often leads to unwanted hydraulic fractures and lost circulation, resulting in non-productive time and elevated costs. The fracture initiation pressure (FIP) and fracture propagation pressure (FPP) are critical for managing these risks, particularly in narrow mud weight windows, yet industrial models overlook post-plugging stress behaviors at plug locations, where changes in stress concentration may initiate secondary fractures. This study introduces a fully coupled hydro-mechanical plane-strain (KGD) finite element model to examine fluid diffusion and deformation in fractured formations, emphasizing plastic and poroelastoplastic effects for wellbore strengthening. Fluid flow in the fracture follows lubrication theory for incompressible Newtonian fluids, while Darcy’s law governs porous media diffusion. Rock deformation adheres to Biot’s effective stress principle, extended to poroelastoplasticity via the Mohr–Coulomb criterion with associative flow. Simulations yield fracture dimensions, fluid pressures, in situ stress changes, and principal stresses during propagation and plugging, for both plastic and poroplastic cases. A new yield factor is proposed, derived from the Mohr–Coulomb criterion, that quantifies the risk of failure and reveals that fracture tips resist propagation through plastic and poroelastoplastic deformation, with the poroelastoplastic coupling amplifying back-stresses and dilation after plugging. Pore pressure evolution critically influences the fracture growth and plugging efficiency. These findings advance wellbore strengthening by optimizing lost circulation material plugs, bridging the gaps from elastic and poroelastic models, and offer practical tools for safer and more efficient plugging in soft rocks through modeling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Mineralogy-Petrology-Economic Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Department of Engineering, Oil and Gas Program, University of Nicosia, CY-1700 Nicosia, Cyprus

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cyprus University of Technology Limassol, CY-3036 Limassol, Cyprus

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Stabilizing the wellbore to prevent lost circulation
2. Avoiding losses in depleted and weak zones by constantly strengthening wellbores10.2118/125093-PA ↗
3. A review on fracture-initiation and -propagation pressures for lost circulation and wellbore strengthening10.2118/181747-PA ↗
4. Geomechanics of lost-circulation events and wellbore strengthening operations10.2118/174088-PA ↗
5. Alberty, M.W., and McLean, M.R. (2004, January 26–29). A physical model for stress cages. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA.10.2118/90493-MS ↗
6. A hydrodynamic model for analysing the closure stresses in the wellbore strengthening problem10.1002/nag.3364 ↗
7. Sarris, E., Aladeyelu, A., and Gravanis, E. (2018, January 22–28). The influence of diffusion in the fracture resistance method for wellbore strengthening: A rock mechanics approach. Proceedings of the AIP Conference, Rhodes, Greece.10.1063/1.5079204 ↗
8. Numerical modelling of fluid-driven fractures in cohesive poroelastoplastic continuum10.1002/nag.2111 ↗
9. Wellbore Strengthening for Addressing Lost Circulation in Fractured Formations: A Comprehensive Review10.1007/s00603-024-04240-7 ↗
10. Modelling lost circulation through drilling-induced fractures10.2118/187945-PA ↗
11. Best practice in understanding and managing lost circulation challenges10.2118/95895-PA ↗
12. Lost circulation materials capability of sealing wide fractures
13. Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing10.2118/686-G ↗
14. Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks10.2118/1710-PA ↗
15. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation10.1063/1.1712886 ↗
16. Fundamentals of poroelasticity
17. Plane strain fracture in poroelastic media10.1098/rspa.1991.0116 ↗
18. Morita, N., Black, A.D., and Fuh, G.F. (1990, January 23–26). Theory of lost circulation pressure. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.2118/20409-MS ↗
19. Aadnoy, B.S., and Looyeh, R. (2011). Petroleum Rock Mechanics: Drilling Operations and Well Design, Gulf Professional Publishing.
20. Guo, Q., Cook, J., Way, P., Ji, L., and Friedheim, J.E. (2014, January 4–6). A comprehensive experimental study on wellbore strengthening. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Fort Worth, TX, USA.10.2118/167957-MS ↗
21. Cao, C., Pu, X., Zhao, Z., Wang, G., and Du, H. (2018). Experimental investigation on wellbore strengthening based on a hydraulic fracturing apparatus. J. Energy Resour. Technol., 140.10.1115/1.4038381 ↗
22. Experimental data analysis of lost-circulation problems during drilling with oil-based mud10.2118/22581-PA ↗
23. Dupriest, F.E. (2005, January 23–25). Fracture closure stress (FCS) and lost returns practices. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.2118/92192-MS ↗
24. Aston, M.S., Alberty, M.W., Duncum, S.D., Bruton, J.R., Friedheim, J.E., and Sanders, M.W. (2007, January 11–14). A new treatment for wellbore strengthening in shale. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.2523/110713-MS ↗
25. Review of fundamental studies on lost circulation and wellbore strengthening10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.052 ↗
26. Numerical modelling of hydraulic fracture problem in permeable medium using cohesive zone model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.11.012 ↗
27. Shojaei, A.K., and Shao, J. (2017). Cohesive Zone Models. Porous Rock Fracture Mechanics, Woodhead Publishing.
28. The genesis of bifurcation and localization of deformation during hydraulic fracturing
29. A non-local model for fracture closure on rough fracture faces and asperities10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.024 ↗
30. Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, P., Liu, H., Ranjith, P.G., and Ma, T. (2025). Multiscale analysis on structural dynamics of fracture plugging zone: A visualization experiment study. Powder Technol., 465.10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121365 ↗
31. Finite-element simulation of a hydraulic fracture interacting with a natural fracture
32. Propagation of a plane-strain hydraulic fracture with a fluid lag: Early-time solution10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.10.009 ↗
33. Toughness-dominated hydraulic fracture with leak-off10.1007/s10704-005-0154-0 ↗
34. Plane-strain propagation of a fluid-driven crack in a permeable rock with fracture toughness
35. Lost-circulation control for formation-damage prevention in naturally fractured reservoir: Mathematical model and experimental study10.2118/182266-PA ↗
36. Smart lost circulation materials for productive zones10.1007/s13202-018-0458-z ↗
37. Zhang, L., Wang, Z., Du, K., Xiao, B., and Chen, W. (2020). A new analytical model of wellbore strengthening for fracture network loss of drilling fluid considering fracture roughness. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 77.10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103093 ↗
38. Evaluation of suspension flow and particulate materials for control of fluid losses in drilling operation10.1016/j.petrol.2015.04.007 ↗
39. Aston, M.S., Alberty, M.W., McLean, M.R., de Jong, H.J., and Armagost, K. (2004, January 2–4). Drilling fluids for wellbore strengthening. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2523/87130-MS ↗
40. Liu, Y., and Ma, T. (2020). Effects of permeable plugs on wellbore strengthening. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 132.10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104416 ↗
41. Formation stability after hydraulic fracturing10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(19991225)23:15<1927::AID-NAG41>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
42. The influence of pumping parameters in fluid-driven fractures in weak porous formations10.1002/nag.2330 ↗
43. Fluid effect on hydraulic fracture propagation behavior: A comparison between water and supercritical CO2-like fluid10.1111/gfl.12061 ↗