journal article·2025-11-11Open access

Landslide Susceptibility Assessment via Imbalanced Data Augmentation with Tabular Variational Autoencoder and Quality–Diversity Post-Selection

Zhengyang Xu, Shitai Wang, Min Yin, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zengyang Lu, Songchao Yu, Junjun Huang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 22

Abstract

Landslides are among the most common geological hazards in mountainous regions, posing significant threats to resident safety and infrastructure stability. Due to the complexity of terrain and the difficulty of field surveys, landslide samples in these areas often suffer from class imbalance, which undermines the accuracy of susceptibility models. To address this issue, this study constructed a multi-factor landslide database and employed a Tabular Variational Autoencoder (TVAE) to generate synthetic samples. A Quality–Diversity (QD) screening strategy was further integrated to enhance the representativeness and diversity of the augmented data. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed TVAE–QD method improves model performance, with generated samples showing distributions closer to real data. Compared with the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and unfiltered TVAE, the TVAE–QD method achieved higher predictive accuracy and exhibited greater robustness under progressive data augmentation. In the Random Forest (RF) model, the TVAE–QD achieved its best performance at a scale of 350, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.923 and a Precision–Recall AUC (PR–AUC) of 0.907, outperforming TVAE and SMOTE. In the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, the AUC peaked at 0.911 at a scale of 450, while the PR–AUC reached its maximum of 0.896 at a scale of 200. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis confirmed that data augmentation preserved interpretability: dominant factors such as elevation, rainfall, and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) remained stable, with only minor adjustments among secondary variables. Overall, the TVAE–QD framework effectively mitigates class imbalance and offers a promising technical solution for landslide risk assessment in mountainous regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Soil erosion and sediment transport

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Guilin Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Guilin 541004, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Surveying

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on an interpretable coupled FR-RF model: A case study of Longyan City, Fujian Province, Southeast China
2. Integrating social vulnerability to improve landslide susceptibility assessment quality: A hybrid machine learning approach10.1007/s42452-025-06798-5 ↗
3. Taşkanat, T., Karkınlı, A.E., Kesikoğlu, A., and Beşdok, E. (2025). Evolutionary optimization of neural network for landslide susceptibility assessment. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.10.1007/s00477-025-03118-6 ↗
4. The impact of different sampling strategies on landslide susceptibility assessment: An explainable hybrid BO-XGBoost model10.1007/s12145-025-01931-9 ↗
5. Xu, S., Wang, Z., Liu, J., Ma, X., Zhou, T., and Tang, Q. (2025). Landslide susceptibility assessment using lightweight dense residual network with emphasis on deep spatial features. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-97074-4 ↗
6. Effect of landslide spatial representation and raster resolution on the landslide susceptibility assessment10.1007/s12665-024-11442-3 ↗
7. He, Z., Zhang, W., Cai, J., Fan, J., Xu, H., Feng, H., Luo, X., and Wu, Z. (2024). Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility in the Moxi Tableland of China by Using a Combination of Deep-Learning and Factor-Refinement Methods. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14125042 ↗
8. Su, L., Gui, Y., Xu, L., and Ming, D. (2024). Rain-Induced Landslide Hazard Assessment Using Inception Model and Interpretability Method—A Case Study of Zayu County, Tibet. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14125324 ↗
9. Ning, Z., and Tie, Y. (2025). Sampling Method Based on Fuzzy Membership for Computing Negative Sample Credibility and Its Applications. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15147646 ↗
10. Regional assessment of coastal landslide susceptibility in Liguria, Northern Italy, using MaxEnt10.1007/s11069-024-06833-5 ↗
11. Ding, D., Wu, Y., Wu, T., and Gong, C. (2025). Landslide susceptibility assessment in Tongguan District Anhui China using information value and certainty factor models. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-93704-z ↗
12. Wang, X., Ma, X., Guo, D., Yuan, G., and Huang, Z. (2024). Construction and Optimization of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Model Based on Machine Learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14146040 ↗
13. Shao, X., Yan, W., Yan, C., Zhao, W., Wang, Y., Shi, X., Dong, H., Li, T., Yu, J., and Zuo, P. (2025). Explainable Machine Learning for Mapping Rainfall-Induced Landslide Thresholds in Italy. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15147937 ↗
14. Landslide susceptibility assessment based on frequency ratio and semi-supervised heterogeneous ensemble learning model10.1007/s11356-024-33287-w ↗
15. Review of landslide susceptibility assessment based on knowledge mapping10.1007/s00477-021-02165-z ↗
16. Landslide susceptibility assessment using information quantity and machine learning integrated models: A case study of Sichuan province, southwestern China10.1007/s12145-025-01700-8 ↗
17. Spatial prediction and mapping of landslide susceptibility using machine learning models10.1007/s11069-025-07132-3 ↗
18. Hyper-parameter optimization for enhanced machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping10.1007/s11356-025-36615-w ↗
19. Optimizing landslide susceptibility mapping using integrated forest by penalizing attributes model with ensemble algorithms10.1007/s12145-025-01727-x ↗
20. Optimizing the application of machine learning models in predicting landslide susceptibility using the information value model in Junlian County of Sichuan Basin10.1016/j.asr.2025.05.020 ↗
21. Investigating landslide data balancing for susceptibility mapping using generative and machine learning models10.1007/s10346-024-02352-3 ↗
22. Handling data imbalance in machine learning based landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Mandakini River Basin, North-Western Himalayas10.1007/s10346-022-01998-1 ↗
23. Impact of sampling for landslide susceptibility assessment using interpretable machine learning models10.1007/s10064-024-03980-8 ↗
24. Three oversampling methods applied in a comparative landslide spatial research in Penang Island, Malaysia10.1007/s42452-020-03307-8 ↗
25. Zhang, S., Wang, Y., and Wu, G. (2022). Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using a Novel Model Based on Gradient Boosting Machine Learning and Class Balancing Methods. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14235945 ↗
26. Song, Y., Yang, D., Wu, W., Zhang, X., Zhou, J., Tian, Z., Wang, C., and Song, Y. (2023). Evaluating Landslide Susceptibility Using Sampling Methodology and Multiple Machine Learning Models. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 12.10.3390/ijgi12050197 ↗
27. Using the rotation and random forest models of ensemble learning to predict landslide susceptibility10.1080/19475705.2020.1803421 ↗
28. Agrawal, K., Baweja, Y., Dwivedi, D., Saha, R., Prasad, P., Agrawal, S., Kapoor, S., Chaturvedi, P., Mali, N., and Kala, V.U. (2017, January 4–15). A Comparison of Class Imbalance Techniques for Real-World Landslide Predictions. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Science (MLDS), Noida, India.10.1109/MLDS.2017.21 ↗
29. Strategy of oversampling geotechnical parameters through geostatistical, SMOTE, and CTGAN methods for assessing susceptibility of landslide10.1007/s10346-023-02166-9 ↗
30. Classification of imbalanced travel mode choice dataset with SMOTE and prediction using interpretable machine learning10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101119 ↗
31. Wang, Y., Wu, X., Chen, Z., Ren, F., Feng, L., and Du, Q. (2019). Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16030368 ↗
32. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
33. Prediction of landslide dam stability and influencing factors analysis10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108021 ↗
34. DemİR, S., and ŞAhİN, E.K. (2022). Evaluation of Oversampling Methods (OVER, SMOTE, and ROSE) in Classifying Soil Liquefaction Dataset based on SVM, RF, and Naïve Bayes. Eur. J. Sci. Technol.10.31590/ejosat.1077867 ↗
35. A review of ensemble learning and data augmentation models for class imbalanced problems: Combination, implementation and evaluation10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122778 ↗
36. Application of classification coupled with PCA and SMOTE, for obtaining safety factor of landslide based on HRA10.1007/s10064-023-03403-0 ↗
37. Examining the role of class imbalance handling strategies in predicting earthquake-induced landslide-prone regions10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110429 ↗
38. Combining a class-weighted algorithm and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Wanzhou section of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104966 ↗
39. Song, Y., Niu, R., Xu, S., Ye, R., Peng, L., Guo, T., Li, S., and Chen, T. (2018). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Weighted Gradient Boosting Decision Tree in Wanzhou Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (China). ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8010004 ↗
40. Xu, L., Skoularidou, M., Cuesta-Infante, A., and Veeramachaneni, K. (2019). Modeling tabular data using conditional GAN. arXiv.
41. Miletic, M., and Sariyar, M. (2024). Challenges of Using Synthetic Data Generation Methods for Tabular Microdata. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14145975 ↗
42. Explainable hybrid tabular Variational Autoencoder and feature Tokenizer Transformer for depression prediction10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126084 ↗
43. A Universal Metric for Robust Evaluation of Synthetic Tabular Data10.1109/TAI.2022.3229289 ↗
44. Landslide susceptibility analysis using random forest model with SMOTE-ENN resampling algorithm10.1080/19475705.2024.2314565 ↗
45. Challenges and opportunities of generative models on tabular data10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112223 ↗
46. Silverman, B.W. (2018). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Routledge.10.1201/9781315140919 ↗
47. Multivariate binary discrimination by the kernel method10.1093/biomet/63.3.413 ↗
48. Nonparametric estimation of distributions with categorical and continuous data10.1016/S0047-259X(02)00025-8 ↗
49. Rihan, M., Talukdar, S., Naikoo, M.W., Ahmed, R., and Rahman, A. (2024). Improving Landslide Susceptibility Prediction in Uttarakhand through Hyper-Tuned Artificial Intelligence and Global Sensitivity Analysis. Earth Syst. Environ.10.1007/s41748-024-00457-2 ↗
50. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30, Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html.
51. Comparative study on landslide susceptibility assessment of different models: A case study of alpine mountainous region in Xinjiang10.1007/s10064-025-04105-5 ↗
52. Comparative analysis of landslide susceptibility assessment accuracy in different evaluation units
53. Susceptibility assessment and driving factor analysis of geological hazards in complex landform areas: Insights from Sichuan, China10.1007/s10064-025-04490-x ↗
54. An innovative method for landslide susceptibility mapping supported by fractal theory, GeoDetector, and random forest: A case study in Sichuan Province, SW China10.1007/s11069-023-06104-9 ↗
55. Influence of human activity on landslide susceptibility development in the Three Gorges area10.1007/s11069-020-04264-6 ↗
56. The influence of forest cover on landslide occurrence explored with spatio-temporal information10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.04.024 ↗
57. Variation in the frequency and characteristics of landslides in response to changes in forest cover and rainfall in Japan over the last century: A literature review10.1016/j.catena.2024.108639 ↗
58. Determination of landslide susceptibility with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the role of forest ecosystem services on landslide susceptibility10.1007/s10661-023-12100-0 ↗