Barriers for Smart Manufacturing Implementation in SMEs: A Comprehensive Exploration and Practical Insights
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify and explore the most significant barriers in implementing smart manufacturing (SM) in terms of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). A two-round Delphi method was used to uncover them in this regard. To assess the reliability of the obtained results, Cronbach’s alpha, Intraclass correlation coefficient, and a statistical F-test were performed for both rounds. Cronbach’s alpha for round 1 was 0.729, and 0.816 for round 2. On this basis, good inter-rater reliability was demonstrated in round 2. At the same time, the Intraclass correlation coefficient from round 1 was 0.54, and from round 2, it was 0.74, indicating a significant improvement in panel consensus. The comparison of the equality of variances within the two rounds using the F-test confirmed that a third round of the survey was not necessary. Moreover, the coefficient of variation and relative interquartile range were applied to assess internal consistency among the involved experts to come to a more comprehensive and cohesive understanding of the issue at hand. A total of 30 barriers/limitations or shortages were identified in the preparatory phase of the research, which, in some sense, do not allow or slow down the implementation of the SM. The Delphi survey found that financial problems, lack of government support, and technological constraints can be considered as the most serious barriers to the implementation of SM in an SME environment. Finally, the obstacles/constraints or shortcomings that proved to be the most critical were analyzed in terms of their impact on the ability of small and medium-sized enterprises to embrace the challenges of smart manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies in Presov, Technical University of Kosice, Bayerova 1, 080 01 Presov, Slovakia
Funding
the project SME 5.0 with funding received from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement · the KEGA project granted by the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic.
References (98)
Show source-provided references
1. Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037 ↗
2. Smart manufacturing and intelligent manufacturing: A comparative review10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.017 ↗
3. Modrak, V., Sudhakarapandian, R., Balamurugan, A., and Soltysova, Z. (2024). A review on reinforcement learning in production scheduling: An inferential perspective. Algorithms, 17.10.20944/preprints202405.0335.v1 ↗
4. Smart manufacturing10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 ↗
5. Okkonen, H., Mazhelis, O., Ahokangas, P., Pussinen, P., Rajahonka, M., Siuruainen, R., Leminen, S., Shveykovskiy, A., Myllykoski, J., and Warma, H. (2025, September 20). Internet-of-Things Market, Value Networks, and Business Models: State of the Art Report. Computer Science and Information Systems Reports. TR-39. Technical Reports. Available online: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstreams/37eb8c0b-7d2d-4d8b-aa46-88d38f66f79e/download.
6. Dai, G., Huang, R., Yuan, J., Hu, Z., Chen, L., Lu, J., and Ji, F. (2023). Towards Flawless Designs: Recent Progresses in Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Technology. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12224577 ↗
7. Sammons, J., and Cross, M. (2016). The Basics of Cyber Safety: Computer and Mobile Device Safety Made Easy, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-416650-9.00001-2 ↗
8. Munasser, H. (2025, May 20). Understanding the Adoption Challenges of IoT Among Small to Medium-Size Enterprises (SMEs): Study in Sweden, Dissertation, 2024. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1918587/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
9. d’Organisation, V. (1982). Structure et Dynamique des Organisations, Eyrolles.
10. Strengths and Weaknesses of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Regarding the Implementation of Lean Manufacturing10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.552 ↗
11. Arnold, V. (2010). Technology Monoculture: ERP Systems, ‘Techno-Process Diversity’ and the Threat to the Information Technology Ecosystem. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1108/S1475-1488(2010)13 ↗
12. An architecture design for smart manufacturing execution system10.1080/16864360.2016.1257189 ↗
13. Modrak, V., and Mandulak, J. (2009, January 2–5). Mapping Development of MES Functionalities. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO 2009), Milan, Italy.
14. Towards Economic Growth—The Impact of Information Technology on Performance of SMEs
15. E-Leadership Through Strategic Alignment: An Empirical Study of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Digital Age10.1057/jit.2016.10 ↗
16. The dynamic and importance of SMEs in economy
17. Soltysova, Z., and Modrak, V. (2020). Challenges of the sharing economy for SMEs: A literature review. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12166504 ↗
18. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 ↗
19. Dalkey, N. (1972). Studies in the Quality of Life, Lexington Books.
20. Sprenkle, D.H., and Piercy, F.P. (2005). The delphi technique. Research Methods in Family Therapy, Guilford. [2nd ed.].
21. Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005 ↗
22. Applying the Delphi method to determine best practices for outsourcing logistics in disaster relief10.1108/JHLSCM-06-2018-0044 ↗
23. Nelson, A.J. (2025, September 20). Using a modified Delphi methodology to develop a competency model for vet practitioners. Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of RM502E-Advanced Study in Research Methods, 2002. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228918594_Using_a_modified_Delphi_methodology_to_develop_a_competency_model_for_VET_practitioners.
24. Memon, M.A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., and Cham, T.H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. J. Appl. Struct. Equ. Model., 4.10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01 ↗
25. Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: Challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031 ↗
26. Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124063 ↗
27. Sustainable venture capital–catalyst for sustainable start-up success?10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.079 ↗
28. Ranking of drivers for integrated lean-green manufacturing for Indian manufacturing SMEs10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.041 ↗
29. Digital transformation in family-owned Mittelstand firms: A dynamic capabilities perspective10.1080/0960085X.2020.1857666 ↗
30. Drivers and barriers analysis for green manufacturing practices in Malaysian SMEs: Preliminary findings10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.085 ↗
31. Fintech and SMEs sustainable business models: Reflections and considerations for a circular economy10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125217 ↗
32. Barriers and challenges to plastics valorisation in the context of a circular economy: Case studies from Italy10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118149 ↗
33. E-commerce technology adoption: A Malaysian grocery SME retail sector study10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.010 ↗
34. Unleashing the role of top management and government support in green supply chain management and sustainable development goals10.1007/s11356-019-07268-3 ↗
35. BIM adoption within Australian Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): An innovation diffusion model10.5130/AJCEB.v16i3.5159 ↗
36. Türkeș, M.C., Oncioiu, I., Aslam, H.D., Marin-Pantelescu, A., Topor, D.I., and Căpușneanu, S. (2019). Drivers and barriers in using industry 4.0: A perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes, 7.10.3390/pr7030153 ↗
37. Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.120 ↗
38. Perceived strategic value-based adoption of Big Data Analytics in emerging economy: A qualitative approach for Indian firms10.1108/JEIM-10-2015-0099 ↗
39. Modeling the Industry 4.0 adoption for sustainable production in Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123489 ↗
40. (2013). Information technology—Security techniques—Information security management systems—Requirements (Standard No. ISO/IEC 27001:2013).
41. Human capital in the smart manufacturing and industry 4.0 revolution
42. Breaking the digitalization barrier for SMEs: A fuzzy logic approach to overcoming challenges in business transformation10.1186/s13731-024-00429-w ↗
43. The adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs: Results of an international study10.1108/MD-09-2018-0973 ↗
44. Wamba, S.F., and Carter, L. (2016). Social media tools adoption and use by SMEs: An empirical study. Social Media and Networking: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global.
45. Sufian, A.T., Abdullah, B.M., Ateeq, M., Wah, R., and Clements, D. (2021). Six-gear roadmap towards the smart factory. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11083568 ↗
46. Analysis of barriers to Industry 4.0 adoption in manufacturing organizations: An ISM approach10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.010 ↗
47. Managing the barriers of Industry 4.0 adoption and implementation in textile and clothing industry: Interpretive structural model and triple helix framework10.1016/j.compind.2020.103372 ↗
48. Valipour Parkouhi, S., Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Fallah Lajimi, H., and Salimi, N. (J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., 2024). Smart manufacturing implementation: Identifying barriers and their related stakeholders and components of technology, J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., ahead-of-print.10.1108/JSTPM-09-2023-0148 ↗
49. SMEs, Barriers and Opportunities on adopting Industry 4.0: A Review10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.086 ↗
50. Müller, J.M., Islam, N., Kazantsev, N., Romanello, R., Olivera, G., Das, D., and Hamzeh, R. (IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 2024). Barriers and Enablers for Industry 4.0 in SMEs: A Combined Integration Framework, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., early access.10.1109/TEM.2024.3365771 ↗
51. A smart manufacturing adoption framework for SMEs10.1080/00207543.2019.1661540 ↗
52. Modrak, V., Soltysova, Z., and Poklemba, R. (2018). Mapping requirements and roadmap definition for introducing I 4.0 in SME environment. Advances in Manufacturing Engineering and Materials: Proceedings of the International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering and Materials (ICMEM 2018), Nový Smokovec, Slovakia, 18–22 June 2018, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-99353-9_20 ↗
53. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 ↗
54. Anderson, G., and Anderson, G. (2016). The Economic Impact of Technology Infrastructure for Smart Manufacturing.10.6028/NIST.EAB.4 ↗
55. Cost Effectiveness of the Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in the US Manufacturing SMEs
56. Orzes, G., Poklemba, R., and Towner, W.T. (2020). Implementing Industry 4.0 in SMEs: A focus group study on organizational requirements. Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-25425-4_9 ↗
57. Häring, K., Pimentel, C., and Teixeira, L. (2023). Industry 4.0 Implementation in Small-and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Recommendations Extracted from a Systematic Literature Review with a Focus on Maturity Models. Logistics, 7.10.3390/logistics7040099 ↗
58. Matt, D.T., Modrak, V., and Zsifkovits, H. (2020). Industry 4.0 for SMEs: Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-25425-4 ↗
59. Systematic literature review on technological transformation in SMEs: A transformation encompassing technology assimilation and business model innovation10.1007/s11301-023-00327-7 ↗
60. Quality control in cyber-physical systems of smart electronics manufacturing10.1088/1742-6596/2094/4/042066 ↗
61. Addressing the evolving standardisation challenges of ‘smart systems’ innovation: Emerging roles for government?10.1093/scipol/scz008 ↗
62. Kedia, M., Sekhani, R., and Katiyar, T. (2020). The Role of Standards in Diffusion of Emerging Technologies Internet of Things (IoT) (No. 20-r-04), Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER).
63. Data analytics in SMEs: Trends and policies
64. Mohamed, M., and Weber, P. (2020, January 15–19). Trends of digitalization and adoption of big data & analytics among UK SMEs: Analysis and lessons drawn from a case study of 53 SMEs. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Cardiff, UK.10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198545 ↗
65. Government regulatory policies for digital transformation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: An evolutionary game analysis10.1057/s41599-023-02250-4 ↗
66. Siddique, H., Dominic, D.D., and Bhushan, S. (2024). The Role of Government Regulations on Manufacturing SME’s Readiness for Industry4. 0 in Malaysia. International Conference on Machine Learning, Advances in Computing, Renewable Energy and Communication, Springer.10.1007/978-981-97-5231-7_33 ↗
67. Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities?10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021 ↗
68. Müller, J.M., Kiel, D., and Voigt, K.I. (2018). What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10010247 ↗
69. Embracing industrial revolution 4.0 in universities10.1088/1757-899X/1088/1/012111 ↗
70. Haron, H. (2018, January 3–5). Education in the Era of IR 4.0. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology 2018 (ICIMTech 2018), Jakarta, Indonesia.
71. Consensus measurement in delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013 ↗
72. Using the delphi process to analyze social policy implementation: A post hoc case from vocational rehabilitation10.1007/BF00999473 ↗
73. Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: A multiple constituency approach10.1097/00004010-200101000-00004 ↗
74. Could you love your job again? Organisational factors to recover teacher enchantment10.1016/j.tate.2024.104580 ↗
75. «safety first»: Design of an anesthetic checklist in pediatrics10.1016/j.redar.2019.06.007 ↗
76. Delphi study for the design and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education10.1186/s41239-016-0009-y ↗
77. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests10.1007/BF02310555 ↗
78. George, D., and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, Allyn & Bacon. [4th ed.]. 11.0 update.
79. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
80. Terminating sequential Delphi survey data collection
81. Which is the best parametric statistical method for analyzing Delphi data?10.22237/jmasm/1241137140 ↗
82. Collaborative Robotics: Application of Delphi Method10.1002/rob.22477 ↗
83. Shafer, D.S., and Zhang, Z. (2012). Introductory Statistics, Saylor Foundation.
84. Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.010.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.019 ↗
85. New IT driven service-oriented smart manufacturing: Framework and characteristics10.1109/TSMC.2017.2723764 ↗
86. Holistic approach for human resource management in Industry 4.010.1016/j.procir.2016.05.102 ↗
87. Employee empowerment and HR flexibility in information technology SMEs
88. The flexible HRM and firm performance nexus: Can empowering leadership play any contingent role?10.1108/IJPPM-06-2021-0360 ↗
89. Conceptual development of learning factory for industrial engineering education in Indonesia context as an enabler of students’ competencies in industry 4.0 era10.1088/1755-1315/426/1/012123 ↗
90. Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on higher education in Vietnam: Challenges and opportunities10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1350 ↗
91. An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses10.1080/07421222.1999.11518227 ↗
92. Factors affecting ERP system adoption: A comparative analysis between SMEs and large companies10.1108/17410390510609572 ↗
93. Global value chain-oriented industrialization: Policies revisited10.37391/ijbmr.110301 ↗
94. Digital manufacturing challenges through open innovation perspective10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.066 ↗
95. Shirasawa, N., and Seo, Y. (2025). The Role of Institutional and Geographic Proximity in Enhancing Creating Shared Value (CSV) Initiatives Within Local Industrial Clusters: A Study of Japanese SMEs. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17062410 ↗
96. Analytical support for identification trends and problems in the development of interaction between stakeholders of education, science and business
97. European Union (2025, July 07). Digital Innovation Clusters Development in the EaP: EU Best Practices in Cluster Management. Available online: https://eufordigital.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/EU4Digital-II_Report_EU-Best-Practices-in-Cluster-Management.pdf.
98. Overcoming the barriers of effective implementation of manufacturing execution system in pursuit of smart manufacturing in SMEs10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.279 ↗