journal article·2025-09-11Open access

Cotton Yield Prediction with Gaussian Distribution Sampling and Variational AutoEncoder

Yaqi Lan, Xiudong Wang, Lei Gao, Xiaoliang Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 18

Abstract

Accurate cotton yield prediction is crucial for agricultural production management, resource optimization, and market supply–demand balance. However, achieving high-precision cotton yield prediction faces significant challenges mainly because cotton growth is influenced by complex, nonlinear environmental factors. Traditional machine learning models struggle to fully capture these complex factors, and deep learning models typically rely on large amounts of high-quality data. The high cost of obtaining field measurement data leads to a scarcity of high-quality datasets, further limiting the performance of prediction models. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes a novel cotton yield prediction architecture—Gaussian distribution data augmentation and variational autoencoder (GD-VAE). This architecture’s configuration offers the following advantages: (1) it calculates the mean and covariance of existing data, with new samples conforming to the original data distribution being sampled and generated to effectively expand the training dataset by utilizing Gaussian distribution data; (2) it uses an end-to-end variational autoencoder (VAE) that automatically learns the low-dimensional, compact, and discriminative feature representations of the input data. Specifically, GD-VAE uses a Gaussian distribution to model the original cotton yield data and generates augmented data through sampling. The VAE then learns deep feature representations from these data, which are fed into a regressor for final yield prediction. To evaluate the performance of GD-VAE, we conducted extensive tests under challenging cross-year and cross-district conditions. In the cross-year test in Bahawalnagar, Pakistan, GD-VAE achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 58.4 lbs/acre, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 38.19 lbs/acre, and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.65 between the actual and predicted yields. In the more challenging cross-year and cross-district test in Turkey, GD-VAE achieved an RMSE of 46.46 kg/da, an MAE of 37.74 kg/da, and an R2 of 0.14. The results indicate that the GD-VAE architecture significantly improves the accuracy of cotton yield prediction under limited data conditions through effective data augmentation and deep feature learning. This research provides an effective technical means for predicting challenges in agriculture with limited samples, which has important practical significance for ensuring global food security and sustainable agricultural development (to enhance analytical tractability, we use each district’s value by converting kg/ha to 1 lbs/acre, with 1.121 kg/ha converting to 1 kg/da, which is equivalent to 10 kg/ha).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Agriculture and AI · Remote Sensing in Agriculture · Research in Cotton Cultivation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Center for Strategic Studies, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Chinese Institute of Agricultural Development Strategies, Beijing 100081, China

School of Computer and Software Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

Department of Computer Science and Operations Research, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3C3J7, Canada

Funding

Key Technology Development for Agricultural Condition Parameter Acquisition and Integrated Application of Sensing Equipment · Science and Technology Development Program of the Pilot Zone for Innovation Driven Development along the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Wu-Chang-Shi National Innovation Demonstration Zone · ‘Tianshan Talent’ Training Program: Research on Carbon Sink Function of Cotton and Carbon Label Creation of Cotton Textile under the Background of Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Water and heat resource utilization influence cotton yield through sowing date optimization under varied climate10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109491 ↗
2. Simulating impacts of climate change on cotton yield and water requirement using RZWQM210.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.030 ↗
3. Increasing exposure of cotton growing areas to compound drought and heat events in a warming climate10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109307 ↗
4. An overview of cotton and polyester, and their blended waste textile valorisation to value-added products: A circular economy approach–research trends, opportunities and challenges10.1080/10643389.2021.1966254 ↗
5. Environmental impacts of cotton and opportunities for improvement10.1038/s43017-023-00476-z ↗
6. Regional integrated assessment of climate change impact on cotton production in a semi-arid environment10.3354/cr01710 ↗
7. Machine learning approach for Forest Biomass Modelling with In-Situ and Remote Sensing Data in Narmadapuram central India10.1007/s40808-025-02527-4 ↗
8. An integrated exergy efficiency and machine learning method for optimizing organic solid waste gasification process10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111805 ↗
9. Ogbonna, C., Ohabuka, C., Bartholomew, D., Anyiam, K., and Adamu, I. (2025). Optimizing Nigerian Bank Lending Systems: The Power of Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) in Denoising and Regression Analysis. Ann. Data Sci., 1–37.10.1007/s40745-025-00626-8 ↗
10. Efficient deep learning: A survey on making deep learning models smaller, faster, and better10.1145/3578938 ↗
11. Few-shot intent detection with self-supervised pretraining and prototype-aware attention10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110641 ↗
12. Deep learning models for digital image processing: A review10.1007/s10462-023-10631-z ↗
13. Wang, H., and Wang, H. (2025). Research on Microseismic Magnitude Prediction Method Based on Improved Residual Network and Transfer Learning. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15158246 ↗
14. Ma, T., Yu, J., Wang, B., Gao, M., Yang, Z., Li, Y., and Fan, M. (2025). A Power Monitor System Cybersecurity Alarm-Tracing Method Based on Knowledge Graph and GCNN. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15158188 ↗
15. Deng, G., Zhou, F., Dong, H., Xu, Z., and Li, Y. (2025). Accurate Sugarcane Detection and Row Fitting Using SugarRow-YOLO and Clustering-Based Spline Methods for Autonomous Agricultural Operations. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15147789 ↗
16. Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Yu, H., Guo, Z., Zhang, R., and Zhou, X. (2023). Research on the Strawberry Recognition Algorithm Based on Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011298 ↗
17. Multi-task learning model driven by climate and remote sensing data collaboration for mid-season cotton yield prediction10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110070 ↗
18. Yu, S.H., Kang, Y., and Lee, C.G. (2023). Comparison of the Spray Effects of Air Induction Nozzles and Flat Fan Nozzles Installed on Agricultural Drones. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011552 ↗
19. Simulating climate change impacts on cotton using AquaCrop model in China10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103897 ↗
20. Shin, H.J., Kim, S., Kang, H., and Lee, A.G. (2023). Novel Instrument for Clinical Evaluations of Active Extraocular Muscle Tension. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011431 ↗
21. Istipliler, D., Ekizoğlu, M., Çakaloğulları, U., and Tatar, Ö. (2024). The impact of environmental variability on cotton fiber quality: A comparative analysis of primary cotton-producing regions in türkiye. Agronomy, 14.10.3390/agronomy14061276 ↗
22. Enhancing human activity recognition using deep learning and time series augmented data10.1007/s12652-020-02865-4 ↗
23. Gao, T., Yao, X., and Chen, D. (2021, January 7–11). SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Online, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.552 ↗
24. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is All you Need. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
25. Cotton yield estimation model based on machine learning using time series UAV remote sensing data
26. Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models10.1098/rsta.2015.0146 ↗
27. Cotton boll distribution: A review10.1002/agj2.20516 ↗
28. Krichen, M. (2023, January 6–8). Generative Adversarial Networks. Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Delhi, India.10.1109/ICCCNT56998.2023.10306417 ↗
29. Cotton production during the tropical monsoon season. I—The influence of variable radiation on boll loss, compensation and yield10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107790 ↗
30. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X ↗
31. Impacts of climate change on cotton production and advancements in genomic approaches for stress resilience enhancement10.1186/s42397-025-00223-3 ↗
32. Xu, W., Yang, W., Chen, P., Zhan, Y., Zhang, L., and Lan, Y. (2023). Cotton Fiber Quality Estimation Based on Machine Learning Using Time Series UAV Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15030586 ↗
33. Multi-source data fusion improved the potential of proximal fluorescence sensors in predicting nitrogen nutrition status across winter wheat growth stages10.1016/j.compag.2024.108786 ↗
34. A Tensor Decomposition-Based Censored Regression Adaptive Filtering Algorithm10.1007/s00034-025-03092-y ↗
35. Classification of seed maize using deep learning and transfer learning based on times series spectral feature reconstruction of remote sensing10.1016/j.compag.2025.110738 ↗
36. Kamangir, H., Hajiesmaeeli, M., and Earles, J.M. (2025, January 11–15). California Crop Yield Benchmark: Combining Satellite Image, Climate, Evapotranspiration, and Soil Data Layers for County-Level Yield Forecasting of Over 70 Crops. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Nashville, TN, USA.
37. Lu, W., Chen, S.B., Shu, Q.L., Tang, J., and Luo, B. (2024). Decouplenet: A lightweight backbone network with efficient feature decoupling for remote sensing visual tasks. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 62.10.1109/TGRS.2024.3465496 ↗
38. An attitude control method with model-aided estimation and parameter-adaptive optimization for high clearance sprayers10.1016/j.compag.2025.110572 ↗