journal article·2025-08-24Open access

Feature Extractor for Damage Localization on Composite-Overwrapped Pressure Vessel Based on Signal Similarity Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves

Houssam El Moutaouakil, Jan Heimann, Daniel Lozano, Vittorio Memmolo, Andreas Schütze

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 17

Abstract

Hydrogen is one of the future green energy sources that could resolve issues related to fossil fuels. The widespread use of hydrogen can be enabled by composite-overwrapped pressure vessels for storage. It offers advantages due to its low weight and improved mechanical performance. However, the safe storage of hydrogen requires continuous monitoring. Combining ultrasonic guided waves with interpretable machine learning provides a powerful tool for structural health monitoring. In this study, we developed a feature extraction approach based on a similarity method that enables interpretability in the proposed machine learning model for damage detection and localization in pressure vessels. Furthermore, a systematic optimization was performed to explore and tune the model’s parameters. This resulting model provides accurate damage localization and is capable of detecting and localizing damage on hydrogen pressure vessels with an average localization error of 2 cm and a classification accuracy of 96.5% when using quantized classification. In contrast, binarized classification yields a higher accuracy of 99.5%, but with a larger localization error of 6 cm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lab for Measurement Technology, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbruecken, Germany

Federal Institute for Material Research and Testing, 12489 Berlin, Germany

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy

Funding

German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF)

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Novel Defect Location Method for Pressure Vessel by Using L (0, 2) Mode Guided Wave10.1115/1.4039502 ↗
2. Ultrasonic pitch and catch technique for non-destructive testing of reinforced concrete slabs10.1186/s43065-020-00012-z ↗
3. Theoretical and experimental analysis of guided wave propagation in plate-like structures with sinusoidal thickness variations10.1007/s43452-022-00564-9 ↗
4. El Moutaouakil, H., Prager, J., Schütze, A., and Schneider, T. (2024). Machine Learning Model Based on Signal Difference Features for Damage Localization on Hydrogen Pressure Vessel Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Sensoren Und Messsyst., 130–136.10.5162/sensoren2024/A5.4 ↗
5. Capineri, L., and Bulletti, A. (2021). Ultrasonic Guided-Waves Sensors and Integrated Structural Health Monitoring Systems for Im-pact Detection and Localization: A Review. Sensors, 21.10.20944/preprints202103.0347.v2 ↗
6. Xiao, Q., Li, K., Zhang, D., and Xu, W. (2018, January 24). Security Risks in Deep Learning Implementations. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/SPW.2018.00027 ↗
7. Comparison of different ML methods concerning prediction quality, domain adaptation and robustness10.1515/teme-2021-0129 ↗
8. Tabatabaeipour, M., Hettler, J., Delrue, S., and Van Den Abeele, K. (2014, January 6–11). Reconstruction Algorithm for Probabilistic Inspection of Damage (RAPID) in Composites. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (ECNDT 2014), Prague, Czech Republic. Available online: https://www.ndt.net/?id=16842.
9. High-resolution damage detection based on local signal difference coefficient model10.1177/1475921714546060 ↗
10. Wang, S., Wu, W., Shen, Y., Liu, Y., and Jiang, S. (2020). Influence of the PZT Sensor Array Configuration on Lamb Wave Tomography Imaging with the RAPID Algorithm for Hole and Crack Detection. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20030860 ↗
11. Ultrasonic characterization of crack-like defects using scattering matrix similarity metrics10.1109/TUFFC.2014.006848 ↗
12. El Moutaouakil, H., Memmolo, V., Schauer, J., Payman, G., Schneider, T., and Schütze, A. (2025, January 19–22). Feature Extraction Based On Signal Similarity for Damage Detection with Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Proceedings of the IEEE I2MTC—International In-stru-mentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Chemnitz, Germany.10.1109/I2MTC62753.2025.11079128 ↗
13. Domain shifts in industrial condition monitoring: A comparative analysis of au-tomated machine learning models10.5194/jsss-14-119-2025 ↗
14. El Moutaouakil, H., Fuchs, C., Savli, E., Heimann, J., Prager, J., Moll, J., Tschöke, K., Márquez Reyes, O., Schackmann, O., and Memmolo, V. (2024, January 10–13). Acquiring a Machine Learning Data Set for Structural Health Monitoring of Hydrogen Pressure Vessels at Operating Conditions using Guided Ultrasonic Waves. Proceedings of the 10th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2024), Potsdam, Germany. Available online: https://www.ndt.net/?id=29754.
15. Schnur, C., Goodarzi, P., Lugovtsova, Y., Bulling, J., Prager, J., Tschöke, K., Moll, J., Schütze, A., and Schneider, T. (2022). Towards Interpretable Machine Learning for Automated Damage Detection Based on Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22010406 ↗
16. Baseline subtraction technique in the fre-quen-cy-wavenumber domain for high sensitivity damage detection10.1016/j.ultras.2013.08.010 ↗
17. High-frequency guided ultrasonic waves for hidden defect detection in multi-layered aircraft structures10.1016/j.ultras.2014.04.023 ↗
18. On the shape-dependent propulsion of nano- and microparticles by traveling ultrasound waves10.1039/D0NA00099J ↗
19. The interaction of Lamb waves with defects10.1109/58.143172 ↗
20. Damage detection on rectangular laminated com-posite plates using wavelet based convolutional neural network technique10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114656 ↗
21. Uncertainty-aware automated machine learning toolbox10.1515/teme-2022-0042 ↗
22. Spuler, M., Sarasola-Sanz, A., Birbaumer, N., Rosenstiel, W., and Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2015, January 25–29). Comparing metrics to evaluate performance of regression methods for decoding of neural signals. Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy.10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318553 ↗
23. Heuristic approaches for support vector machines with the ramp loss10.1007/s11590-013-0630-9 ↗
24. (2024, May 15). MathWorks: Support Vector Machines for Binary Classification. Version R2024a. Available online: http://www.mpi-forum.org.
25. Guo, J., Zeng, X., Liu, Q., and Qing, X. (2022). Lamb Wave-Based Damage Localization and Quantification in Composites Using Probabilistic Imaging Algorithm and Statistical Method. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22134810 ↗
26. Damage detection with ultrasonic guided waves using machine learning and aggregated baselines10.1177/14759217231169719 ↗
27. XIII. A Statistical Examination of the Centroid Method
28. Bayoumi, A.B.M., Savli, E., Mueller, I., Tschöke, K., Memmolo, V., and Moll, J. (2024, January 10–13). Reliability Assessment of Damage Localization Techniques for Guided Wave-based Structural Health Monitoring Systems in Composite Stiffened Structures. Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2024), Potsdam, Germany.
29. Mixed Skewness Probability Modeling and Extreme Value Predicting for Physical System Input–Output Based on Full Bayesian Generalized Maximum-Likelihood Estimation