journal article·2025-07-25Open access

A Privacy Preserving Attribute-Based Access Control Model for the Tokenization of Mineral Resources via Blockchain

Padmini Nemala, Ben Chen, Hui Cui

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

The blockchain technology is transforming the mining industry by enabling mineral reserve tokenization, improving security, transparency, and traceability. However, controlling access to sensitive mining data remains a challenge. Existing access control models, such as role-based access control, are too rigid because they assign permissions based on predefined roles rather than real-world conditions like mining licenses, regulatory approvals, or investment status. To address this, this paper explores an attribute-based access control model for blockchain-based mineral tokenization systems. ABAC allows access permissions to be granted dynamically based on multiple attributes rather than fixed roles, making it more adaptable to the mining industry. This paper presents a high-level system design that integrates ABAC with the blockchain using smart contracts to manage access policies and ensure compliance. The proposed model is designed for permissioned blockchain platforms, where access control decisions can be automated and securely recorded. A comparative analysis between ABAC and RBAC highlights how ABAC provides greater flexibility, security, and privacy for mining operations. By introducing ABAC in blockchain-based mineral reserve tokenization, this paper contributes to a more efficient and secure way of managing data access in the mining industry, ensuring that only authorized stakeholders can interact with tokenized mineral assets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Cryptography and Data Security

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Software Systems and Cybersecurity, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Blockchain Technology and Mining Industry: A Review
2. Blockchain technology needs for sustainable mineral supply chains: A framework for responsible sourcing of cobalt10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.262 ↗
3. Digital extraction: Blockchain traceability in mineral supply chains10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102381 ↗
4. DF-RBAC: Dynamic and Fine-grained Role-Based Access Control Scheme with Smart Contract10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.074 ↗
5. Smart Contract-Based Access Control for the Internet of Things10.1109/JIOT.2018.2847705 ↗
6. Access control in the Internet of Things: Big challenges and new opportunities10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.007 ↗
7. Blockchain-envisioned access control for Internet of things applications: A comprehensive survey and future directions10.1007/s11235-022-00938-7 ↗
8. Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., and Yellick, J. (2018, January 23–26). Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned Blockchains. Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, Porto, Portugal.10.1145/3190508.3190538 ↗
9. Sukhwani, H., Wang, N., Trivedi, K.S., and Rindos, A. (2018, January 1–3). Performance Modeling of Hyperledger Fabric (Permissioned Blockchain Network). Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), Cambridge, MA, USA.10.1109/NCA.2018.8548070 ↗
10. Distributed Attribute-Based Access Control System Using Permissioned Blockchain10.1007/s11280-021-00874-7 ↗
11. Lawal, S., and Krishnan, R. (2021). Attribute-Based Access Control Policy Review in Permissioned Blockchain. Secure Knowledge Management in the Artificial Intelligence Era, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, SKM 2021, San Antonio, TX, USA, 8–9 October 2021, Springer.
12. Xu, Z., and Stoller, S.D. (2013). Mining Attribute-Based Access Control Policies. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.2401.
13. Hameed, K., Raza, A., Garg, S., and Amin, M.B. (2022). A Blockchain-based Decentralised and Dynamic Authorisation Scheme for the Internet of Things. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.4625442 ↗
14. (2025, July 20). Web3in Tech-Lab: Real-world Blockchain Applications in Mineral Governance. Available online: https://www.web3in.tech/.
15. Pericherla, S.K., Garimella, N., and Garimella, N. (2022, January 4–5). Towards Providing Full Attribute-Based Access Control Functionality in Hyperledger Fabric. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies and Applications, Coimbatore, India.10.1007/978-3-031-06975-8_21 ↗
16. Vero Minerals Platform (2025, May 03). Transforming Mineral Ownership into Digital Assets. Available online: https://veromining.io.
17. DAMREV (2025, May 01). Tokenized Minerals: Transforming Natural Resources into Digital Assets. Available online: https://www.damrev.com/2024/03/22/tokenized-minerals-transforming-natural-resources-into-digital-assets.
18. Tokenized Assets in a Decentralized Economy: Balancing Efficiency, Value, and Risks10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109554 ↗
19. Hu, V.C., Ferraiolo, D.F., Kuhn, R., Schnitzer, A., Sandlin, K., Miller, R., and Scarfone, K. (2015). Guide to Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) Definition and Considerations, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Technical Report NIST Special Publication 800-162.10.6028/NIST.SP.800-162 ↗
20. An Attribute-Based Access Control Model for Internet of Things Using Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain10.1155/2022/6926408 ↗
21. Combo-Chain: Towards a hierarchical attribute-based access control system for IoT with smart contract and sharding technique10.1016/j.iot.2024.101080 ↗
22. Abdulrahman, E., Alshehri, S., Alzubaidy, A., and Cherif, A. (2025). A Distributed Blockchain-based Access Control for the Internet of Things. arXiv.
23. A traceable and revocable multi-authority attribute-based access control scheme for mineral industry data secure storage in blockchain10.1007/s11227-023-05222-2 ↗
24. Hu, V.C., Ferraiolo, D., and Kuhn, R. (2015). Assessment of Access Control Systems. Nist Interagency/Internal Rep. (Nistir), 7316.
25. Alshehri, S., and Bamasag, O. (2022). AAC-IoT: Attribute Access Control Scheme for IoT Using Lightweight Cryptography and Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12168111 ↗
26. Monrat, A.A., Schelén, O., and Andersson, K. (2020, January 16–18). Performance Evaluation of Permissioned Blockchain Platforms. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE), Online.10.1109/CSDE50874.2020.9411380 ↗
27. Fabric-IoT: A Blockchain-Based Access Control System in IoT10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968492 ↗
28. A Novel Permissioned Blockchain Approach for Scalable and Privacy-Preserving IoT Authentication10.63180/jcsra.thestap.2025.4.3 ↗
29. An Introduction to Docker for Reproducible Research10.1145/2723872.2723882 ↗
30. The case of HyperLedger Fabric as a blockchain solution for healthcare applications10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100012 ↗
31. Kamhoua, C.A., Njilla, L.L., Kott, A., and Shetty, S. (2020). Decentralized Access Control for IoT Based on Blockchain and Smart Contract. Modeling and Design of Secure Internet of Things, Wiley.10.1002/9781119593386 ↗
32. Riabi, I., Ben Ayed, H.K., and Saidane, L.A. (2019, January 24–28). A Survey on Blockchain-Based Access Control for Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2019 15th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Tangier, Morocc.10.1109/IWCMC.2019.8766453 ↗
33. BlockSim: A Simulation Framework for Blockchain Systems10.1145/3308897.3308956 ↗
34. Razmyslovich, A., Murasheva, K., Sedlova, S., Capitaine, J., and Dmitriev, E. (2025). ELTEX: A Framework for Domain-Driven Synthetic Data Generation. arXiv.
35. Internet of Things: A survey on the security of IoT frameworks
36. (2019). Date and Time Format (Standard No. ISO 8601).
37. Scalability of Blockchain: A Comprehensive Review and Future Research Direction10.1007/s10586-023-04257-7 ↗
38. FastFabric: Scaling Hyperledger Fabric to 20,000 Transactions per Second10.1002/nem.2099 ↗
39. Thakkar, P., Nathan, S., and Viswanathan, B. (2018). Performance Benchmarking and Optimizing Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platform. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.11390.10.1109/MASCOTS.2018.00034 ↗
40. Bano, S., Sonnino, A., Al-Bassam, M., Azouvi, S., McCorry, P., Meiklejohn, S., and Danezis, G. (2019, January 21–23). SOK: Consensus in the age of blockchains. Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland.
41. Sukhwani, H., Pai, S., Eugster, P.T., and Garg, V.K. (2017, January 26–29). Performance Modeling of PBFT Consensus Process for Permissioned Blockchain Network. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 36th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), Hong Kong.10.1109/SRDS.2017.36 ↗
42. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., and Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction, Princeton University Press. Available online: https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691171692/bitcoin-and-cryptocurrency-technologies.
43. Zhang, J., Yuan, L., and Xu, S. (2021). A Lightweight Blockchain-Based Access Control Scheme for Integrated Edge Computing in the Internet of Things. arXiv.