Identification of AI-Generated Rock Thin-Section Images by Feature Analysis Under Data Scarcity
Source abstract
Abstract
An important aspect of geoscience and energy research is the analysis of microscopic images, where the assessment of rock properties combines imaging methods with numerical analysis. Given the significant advancements in generative artificial intelligence technologies in recent years, which have enabled the creation of realistic images, a need arises to assess the authenticity of synthetic visual data compared to authentic geological data images. This article evaluates the potential for identifying artificially generated microscopic rock images. Synthetic images were generated using a widely accessible diffusion model, based on real training data. Expert evaluation noted high realism, though some structural and rock-type differences remained detectable. In the study, image descriptors were analyzed to assess their usefulness in distinguishing synthetic data from real data. Discriminative feature selection was conducted, and the effectiveness of various classification models based on the selected parameter sets was compared. The study also proposes a heuristic coefficient demonstrating discriminative potential for the analyzed images. The results confirm the feasibility of building classifiers for synthetic images that could aid in detecting generated visual data in geological and petrographic research. They also serve as a foundation for further exploration of the importance of individual features in such applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mineral Processing and Grinding · Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. A comprehensive overview of Generative AI (GAI): Technologies, applications, and challenges10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129645 ↗
2. A review on evaluation of microstructural parameters to estimate the strength of virtually isotropic rock materials10.1007/s10706-024-02802-8 ↗
3. Long, T., Zhou, Z., Hancke, G., Bai, Y., and Gao, Q. (2022). A review of artificial intelligence technologies in mineral identification: Classification and visualization. J. Sens. Actuator Netw., 11.10.3390/jsan11030050 ↗
4. Santoro, L., Lezzerini, M., Aquino, A., Domenighini, G., and Pagnotta, S. (2022). A Novel Method for Evaluation of Ore Minerals Based on Optical Microscopy and Image Analysis: Preliminary Results. Minerals, 12.10.3390/min12111348 ↗
5. Identification of macerals of the inertinite group using neural classifiers, based on selected textural features
6. Habrat, M., and Młynarczuk, M. (2020). Granulation-Based Reverse Image Retrieval for Microscopic Rock Images. International Conference on Computational Science, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-50420-5_6 ↗
7. Search of visually similar microscopic rock images10.1007/s10596-014-9459-2 ↗
8. Wang, C., Li, P., Long, Q., Chen, H., Wang, P., Meng, Z., and Zhou, Y. (2024). Deep learning for refined lithology identification of sandstone microscopic images. Minerals, 14.10.3390/min14030275 ↗
9. Zhang, Y., Li, M., Han, S., Ren, Q., and Shi, J. (2019). Intelligent identification for rock-mineral microscopic images using ensemble machine learning algorithms. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19183914 ↗
10. Feature fusion of single and orthogonal polarized rock images for intelligent lithology identification10.1007/s43503-025-00049-7 ↗
11. Integrated lithology identification based on images and elemental data from rocks10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108853 ↗
12. Abdellatif, A., Elsheikh, A.H., Busby, D., and Berthet, P. (2022). Generation of non-stationary stochastic fields using Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv.
13. When geoscience meets generative AI and large language models: Foundations, trends, and future challenges10.1111/exsy.13654 ↗
14. GeoAI: A review of artificial intelligence approaches for the interpretation of complex geomatics data10.5194/gi-11-195-2022 ↗
15. Application of machine learning, deep learning and optimization algorithms in geoengineering and geoscience: Comprehensive review and future challenge10.1016/j.gr.2022.03.015 ↗
16. Ferreira, I., Ochoa, L., and Koeshidayatullah, A. (2022). On the generation of realistic synthetic petrographic datasets using a style-based GAN. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-16034-4 ↗
17. Geo Fossils-I: A synthetic dataset of 2D fossil images for computer vision applications on geology10.1016/j.dib.2023.109188 ↗
18. Arlovic, M., Damjanovic, D., Hrzic, F., and Balen, J. (2024, January 16–18). Synthetic Dataset Generation Methods for Computer Vision Application. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Smart Systems and Technologies (SST), Osijek, Croatia.10.1109/SST61991.2024.10755475 ↗
19. Saif, A., Alnagi, E., and Ahmad, A. (2025). Texture-Based Classification of Geo-Fossils. International Conference on Information Integration and Web Intelligence, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-78093-6_20 ↗
20. Qaderi, S., Maghsoudi, A., Pour, A.B., Rajabi, A., and Yousefi, M. (2025). DCGAN-Based Feature Augmentation: A Novel Approach for Efficient Mineralization Prediction Through Data Generation. Minerals, 15.10.3390/min15010071 ↗
21. Advancements in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of GANs, GPT, Autoencoders, Diffusion Model, and Transformers10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3397775 ↗
22. Corvi, R., Cozzolino, D., Zingarini, G., Poggi, G., Nagano, K., and Verdoliva, L. (2023, January 4–10). On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion models. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2023—2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Rhodes Island, Greece.10.1109/ICASSP49357.2023.10095167 ↗
23. Vayadande, K., Sawant, A., Pawar, A., Rajurkar, S., Shendre, R., and Waghmode, J. (2024, January 11–13). Enhanced Detection of Deep Fakes: Exploring Advanced Approaches. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Sustainable Communication Networks and Application (ICSCNA), Theni, India.10.1109/ICSCNA63714.2024.10864123 ↗
24. Three-classification face manipulation detection using attention-based feature decomposition10.1016/j.cose.2022.103024 ↗
25. Chauhan, R., Popli, R., and Kansal, I. (2022, January 13–14). A comprehensive review on fake images/videos detection techniques. Proceedings of the 2022 10th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India.10.1109/ICRITO56286.2022.9964871 ↗
26. An overview on the generation and detection of synthetic and manipulated satellite images10.1561/116.00000142 ↗
27. Generating microscopic images of rocks using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)
28. Diab, M., Herrera, J., Chernow, B., and Mao, C. (2025, July 21). Stable Diffusion Prompt Book, 2022, OpenArt. Available online: https://openart.ai/blog.
29. Benford’s law in the natural sciences10.1029/2010GL044830 ↗