journal article·2025-07-31Open access

Reviewing Breakthroughs and Limitations of Implantable and External Medical Device Treatments for Spinal Cord Injury

Tooba Wallana, Konstantinos Banitsas, Wamadeva Balachandran

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major disability that, to this day, does not have a permanent cure. The spinal cord extends caudally through the body structure of the vertebral column and is part of the central nervous system (CNS). The spinal cord enables neural communication and motor coordination, so injuries can disrupt sensation, movement, and autonomic functions. Mechanical and traumatic damage to the spinal cord causes lesions to the nerves, resulting in the disruption of relayed messages to the extremities. Various forms of treatment for the spinal cord include functional electrical stimulation (FES), epidural electrical stimulation (EES), ‘SMART’ devices, exoskeleton and robotic systems, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and neuroprostheses using AI for the brain–computer interface. This research is going to analyse and review these current treatment methods for spinal cord injury and identify the current gaps and limitations in these, such as long-term biocompatibility, wireless adaptability, cost, regulatory barriers, and risk of surgery. Future advancements should work on implementing wireless data logging with AI algorithms to increase SCI device adaptability, as well as maintaining regulatory and health system integration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spinal Cord Injury Research · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Muscle activation and electromyography studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Brunel University of London, London UB8 3PH, UK

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Rhind, J. (2025, January 23). How Many Spinal Cord Injuries Occur Each Year? JMW Solicitors. Available online: https://www.jmw.co.uk/articles/spinal-injuries/how-many-spinal-cord-injuries-each-year.
2. Anwar, M.A., Al Shehabi, T.S., and Eid, A.H. (2016). Inflammogenesis of Secondary Spinal Cord Injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci., 10.10.3389/fncel.2016.00098 ↗
3. Lima, R., Monteiro, A., Salgado, A.J., Monteiro, S., and Silva, N.A. (2022). Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches for Spinal Cord Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms232213833 ↗
4. Bennett, J., Das, J.M., and Emmady, P.D. (2025, May 01). Spinal Cord Injuries, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560721/.
5. Spinal cord anatomy, pain, and spinal cord stimulation mechanisms10.1053/j.semss.2017.05.002 ↗
6. Harrow-Mortelliti, M., Jimsheleishvili, G., and Reddy, V. (2025, May 01). Physiology, Spinal Cord, Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544267/.
7. Application of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.101 ↗
8. Neuroprosthetic technology for individuals with spinal cord injury10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000128 ↗
9. Gupta, A., Vardalakis, N., and Wagner, F.B. (2023). Neuroprosthetics: From sensorimotor to cognitive disorders. Commun. Biol., 6.10.1038/s42003-022-04390-w ↗
10. Powered exoskeletons for bipedal locomotion after spinal cord injury10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/031001 ↗
11. Functional Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury: From Theory to Practice10.1310/sci1801-28 ↗
12. Functional Electrical Stimulation and Spinal Cord Injury10.1016/j.pmr.2014.05.001 ↗
13. Functional electrical stimulation cycling improves body composition, metabolic and neural factors in persons with spinal cord injury10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.002 ↗
14. (2025, May 01). Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling for Spinal Cord Injury. Physiopedia. Available online: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Functional_Electrical_Stimulation_Cycling_for_Spinal_Cord_Injury.
16. Development of a battery-free ultrasonically powered functional electrical stimulator for movement restoration after paralyzing spinal cord injury10.1186/s12984-019-0501-4 ↗
17. The role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after Spinal Cord Injury10.1186/s10195-021-00623-6 ↗
18. Paradigms of lower extremity electrical stimulation training after spinal cord injury
19. Garments for functional electrical stimulation: Design and proofs of concept
20. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for upper extremity rehabilitation following Spinal Cord Injury: A pilot study10.1038/s41394-023-00568-4 ↗
21. Multicentre, single-blind randomised controlled trial comparing MyndMove neuromodulation therapy with conventional therapy in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A protocol study10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039650 ↗
22. Chalif, J.I., Chavarro, V.S., Mensah, E., Johnston, B., Fields, D.P., Chalif, E.J., Chiang, M., Sutton, O., Yong, R., and Trumbower, R. (2024). Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury in Humans: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13041090 ↗
23. (2025, May 01). Spinal Cord Injury Epidural Stimulation. Mayo Clinic. Available online: https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials/cls-20167853.
24. Ren, Y., Mo, L., Lu, J., Zhu, P., Yin, M., Jia, W., Liang, F., Han, X., and Zhao, J. (2025). Epidural electrical stimulation for functional recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury. Cyborg Bionic Syst., 6.10.34133/cbsystems.0314 ↗
25. Epidural electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury10.4103/1673-5374.313017 ↗
26. Enabling task-specific volitional motor functions via spinal cord neuromodulation in a human with paraplegia10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.014 ↗
27. Neuromodulation of lumbosacral spinal networks enables independent stepping after complete paraplegia10.1038/s41591-018-0175-7 ↗
28. Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after Motor Complete Paraplegia: A Case Study10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60547-3 ↗
29. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans10.1093/brain/awu038 ↗
30. (2025, May 01). PelicanSSNadmin. Smart Implants Used to Monitor Spinal Fusion Healing—Spinal Surgery News. Spinal Surgery News, 28 June 2022. Available online: https://www.spinalsurgerynews.com/2022/06/smart-implants-used-to-monitor-spinal-fusion-healing/95622.
31. Patient-Specific Self-Powered Metamaterial Implants for Detecting Bone Healing Progress10.1002/adfm.202203533 ↗
32. Flexible circumferential bioelectronics to enable 360-degree recording and stimulation of the spinal cord10.1126/sciadv.adl1230 ↗
33. (2025, June 15). Wraparound Implants Represent New Approach to Treating Spinal Cord Injuries. University of Cambridge. Available online: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/wraparound-implants-represent-new-approach-to-treating-spinal-cord-injuries.
34. (2025, May 01). Spinal Cord Injury Braces & Walking Systems. Reeve Foundation. Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation. Available online: https://www.christopherreeve.org/todays-care/living-with-paralysis/rehabilitation/living-with-paralysis-rehabilitation-exoskeletons/.
35. Design, Control, and Pilot Study of a Lightweight and Modular Robotic Exoskeleton for Walking Assistance After Spinal Cord Injury10.1115/1.4045510 ↗
36. Dosing overground robotic gait training after Spinal Cord Injury: A randomized clinical trial protocol10.1186/s13063-024-08503-0 ↗
37. Levin, K.H., and Chauvel, P. (2019). Chapter 37—Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Elsevier. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780444640321000370.
38. Wang, Y., Dong, T., Li, X., Zhao, H., Yang, L., Xu, R., Fu, Y., Li, L., Gai, X., and Qin, D. (2023). Research progress on the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: A narrative review. Front. Neurol., 14.10.3389/fneur.2023.1219590 ↗
39. Leszczyńska, K., and Huber, J. (2023). The Role of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Peripheral Electrotherapy, and Neurophysiology Tests for Managing Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury. Biomedicines, 11.10.3390/biomedicines11041035 ↗
40. NTMS in spinal cord injury: Current evidence, challenges and a future direction10.1016/j.bas.2025.104234 ↗
41. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with body weight-supported treadmill training enhances independent walking of individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized clinical trial10.1007/s10548-024-01072-0 ↗
42. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in basic and clinical neuroscience: A comprehensive review of fundamental principles and novel insights10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.006 ↗
43. The Human Central Pattern Generator for locomotion: Does it exist and contribute to walking?
44. DARPA-funded efforts in the development of novel brain–computer interface technologies10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.019 ↗
45. (2025, January 27). DARPA. Bridging the Gap (BG+): AI-Enabled Solutions for Spinal Cord Injury, YouTube. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyJcm-CfusI.
46. Liu, D., Shan, Y., Wei, P., Li, W., Xu, H., Liang, F., Liu, T., Zhao, G., and Hong, B. (2024). Reclaiming hand functions after complete spinal cord injury with epidural brain-computer interface. medRXiv, preprint.10.1101/2024.09.05.24313041 ↗
47. Using repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for evaluation motor cortex excitability10.1063/1.5129299 ↗
48. Eko, S. (2025, July 19). 11 Challenges in Medical Device Design and How to Solve Them. iBrandStudio. Available online: https://ibrandstudio.com/articles/challenges-in-medical-device-design-how-to-solve.
49. Huang, Y., Millar, J., Long, Y., Zhao, Y., and Haddadi, H. (2024, January 22). Towards low-energy adaptive personalization for resource-constrained devices. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Machine Learning and Systems, Athens, Greece.10.1145/3642970.3655826 ↗
50. Wireless Industrial Monitoring and control networks: The journey so far and the road ahead10.3390/jsan1020123 ↗
51. The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in multiple sclerosis: A multicentre randomized trial10.1177/0269215519842254 ↗
52. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic exoskeleton versus conventional physiotherapy for stroke rehabilitation in Singapore from A Health System Perspective10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095269 ↗
53. Kumbhar, S., Khadtare, S., Zoman, S., Rane, D., Patel, V., and Bhinge, S. (2025). Regulatory complexities in Mdsap: Challenges and pathways for implantable medical device approval. Biomed. Mater. Devices, 3.10.1007/s44174-025-00367-5 ↗
54. European Commission (2021). Regulation
55. (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Medical Devices. Off. J. Eur. Union., 60, 117-176. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0745.