journal article·2025-08-06Open access

Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration: Fabrication, Characterization, and Biocompatibility Evaluation—Toward Smart 2D Biomaterials

Julia Radwan-Pragłowska, Aleksandra Kopacz, Aleksandra Sierakowska-Byczek, Łukasz Janus, Piotr Radomski, Aleksander Radwan-Pragłowski

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

Electrospun nanofibrous membranes have gained considerable attention in bone tissue engineering due to their ability to mimic the extracellular matrix and provide a suitable environment for cell attachment and proliferation. This study investigates the fabrication, characterization, and biocompatibility of poly(L-lactic acid) (PLA)-based membranes enhanced with periclase (MgO) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The membranes were fabricated using an optimized electrospinning process and subsequently characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and contact angle measurements. Additionally, in vitro biodegradation studies in simulated body fluid (SBF) and cytocompatibility tests with osteoblast-like cells were conducted. The results demonstrated that the incorporation of MgO and AuNPs significantly influenced the structural and chemical properties of the membranes, improving their wettability and bioactivity. SEM imaging confirmed uniform fiber morphology with well-distributed nanoparticles. FT-IR spectroscopy indicated successful integration of bioactive components into the PLA matrix. Cytocompatibility assays showed that modified membranes promoted higher osteoblast adhesion and proliferation compared to pristine PLA membranes. Furthermore, biodegradation studies revealed a controlled degradation rate suitable for guided bone regeneration applications. These findings suggest that electrospun PLA membranes enriched with MgO and AuNPs present a promising biomaterial for GBR applications, offering improved bioactivity, mechanical stability, and biocompatibility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biotechnology and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

CUT Doctoral School, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

Department of Chemical Technology and Environmental Analytics, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Godoy, E.P., Artioli, L.G., Botticelli, D., Nicoletti, F., Dassatti, L., Bragaglia, M., Nanni, F., Xavier, S.P., and Silva, E.R. (2025). Novel Soybean Oil-Based 3D Printed Resin Membrane Used for Guided Bone Regeneration in Calvaria Bone Critical-Size Defects: A Microtomographic and Histologic Study in Rats. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15042184 ↗
2. Taniguchi, Y., Koyanagi, T., Kitanaka, Y., Yamada, A., Aoki, A., and Iwata, T. (2025). Guided Bone Regeneration Using Carbonated Apatite Granules and L-Lactic Acid/ε-Caprolactone Membranes: A Case Series and Histological Evaluation. Dent. J., 13.10.3390/dj13020085 ↗
3. Ashoka Sreeja, H., Couso-Queiruga, E., Raabe, C., Chappuis, V., and Asparuhova, M.B. (2025). Biofunctionalization of Collagen Barrier Membranes with Bone-Conditioned Medium, as a Natural Source of Growth Factors, Enhances Osteoblastic Cell Behavior. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 26.10.3390/ijms26041610 ↗
4. Duarte, F., Ramos, C., Santos-Marino, J., Martínez-Rodriguez, N., Barona-Dorado, C., and Martínez-González, J.M. (2025). Bone Resorption Assessment Following Zygomatic Implants Surgery over 10 Years of Follow-Up. J. Clin. Med., 14.10.3390/jcm14030989 ↗
5. Guided Bone Regeneration Improves Defect Fill and Reconstructive Outcomes in 3-Wall Peri-Implantitis Defects10.1038/s41432-024-01073-9 ↗
6. Review of the Long-Term Outcomes of Guided Bone Regeneration and Autologous Bone Block Augmentation for Vertical Dental Restoration of Dental Implants
7. Ren, Y., Fan, L., Alkildani, S., Liu, L., Emmert, S., Najman, S., Rimashevskiy, D., Schnettler, R., Jung, O., and Xiong, X. (2022). Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR): A Focus on Recent Advances in Collagen Membranes. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms232314987 ↗
8. Proniewicz, E., Vijayan, A.M., Surma, O., Szkudlarek, A., and Molenda, M. (2024). Plant-Assisted Green Synthesis of MgO Nanoparticles as a Sustainable Material for Bone Regeneration: Spectroscopic Properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.3390/ijms25084242 ↗
9. Hosseini, S.F., Galefi, A., Hosseini, S., Shaabani, A., Farrokhi, N., Jahanfar, M., Nourany, M., Homaeigohar, S., Alipour, A., and Shahsavarani, H. (2024). Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticle Reinforced Pumpkin-Derived Nanostructured Cellulose Scaffold for Enhanced Bone Regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 281.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136303 ↗
10. Gold Nanoparticles: Promising Biomaterials for Osteogenic/Adipogenic Regulation in Bone Repair10.1039/D2TB02563A ↗
11. Yang, D.H., Nah, H., Lee, D., Min, S.J., Park, S., An, S.H., Wang, J., He, H., Choi, K.S., and Ko, W.K. (2024). A Review on Gold Nanoparticles as an Innovative Therapeutic Cue in Bone Tissue Engineering: Prospects and Future Clinical Applications. Mater. Today Bio, 26.10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101016 ↗
12. Farjaminejad, S., Farjaminejad, R., and Garcia-Godoy, F. (2024). Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review of Current Advances and Future Directions in Tissue Engineering. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.10.3390/jfb15090241 ↗
13. Recent Advances of Nanoparticles on Bone Tissue Engineering and Bone Cells10.1039/D3NA00851G ↗
14. The history of the science and technology of electrospinning from 1600 to 1995
15. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗
16. Lewandowska, M., and Kurzydłowski, K. (2010). Nanomateriały Inżynierskie Konstrukcyjne i Funkcjonalne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
17. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibres from multiple jets on a porous tubular surface10.1088/0957-4484/17/4/046 ↗
18. New Biodegradable Nanoparticles-in-Nanofibers Based Membranes for Guided Periodontal Tissue and Bone Regeneration with Enhanced Antibacterial Activity10.1016/j.jare.2020.06.014 ↗
19. A Synthetic Biodegradable Polymer Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Bone Defect10.1166/jbn.2021.3044 ↗
20. Effect of Polylactic Acid Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration in Anterior Maxillary Implantation10.12659/MSM.938566 ↗
21. Castañeda-Rodríguez, S., González-Torres, M., Ribas-Aparicio, R.M., Del Prado-Audelo, M.L., Leyva-Gómez, G., Sönmez Gürer, E., and Sharifi-Rad, J. (2023). Recent Advances in Modified Poly (Lactic Acid) as Tissue Engineering Materials. J. Biol. Eng., 17.10.1186/s13036-023-00338-8 ↗
22. Zhang, H.Y., Jiang, H.B., Kim, J.-E., Zhang, S., Kim, K.-M., and Kwon, J.-S. (2020). Bioresorbable Magnesium-Reinforced PLA Membrane for Guided Bone/Tissue Regeneration. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 112.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104061 ↗
23. Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone10.1038/ncomms2720 ↗
24. Blood and interstitial flow in the hierarchical pore space architecture of bone tissue10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.013 ↗
25. Currey, J.D. (2006). Bones: Structure and Mechanics, Princeton University Press.
26. Lee, C.A., and Einhorn, T.A. (2001). The bone organ system: Form and function. Osteoporosis, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012470862-4/50002-7 ↗
27. de Buffrénil, V., de Ricqlès, A.J., Zylberberg, L., and Padian, K. (2021). Vertebrate Skeletal Histology and Paleohistology, CRC Press.10.1201/9781351189590 ↗
28. Bone formation and resorption as the determinants of trabecular bone volume in postmenopausal osteoporosis10.1016/S0140-6736(81)90526-2 ↗
29. Electrospinning of in situ synthesized silica-based and calcium phosphate bioceramics for applications in bone tissue engineering: A review10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.032 ↗
30. Alberts, B. (2017). Molecular Biology of the Cell, Garland Science.10.1201/9781315735368 ↗
31. Ducheyne, P. (2017). Comprehensive Biomaterials II, Elsevier.
32. Wang, B., Zhang, Z., and Pan, H. (2023). Bone Apatite Nanocrystal: Crystalline Structure, Chemical Composition, and Architecture. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8010090 ↗
33. Pountos, I., and Giannoudis, P.V. (2018). Fracture healing: Back to basics and latest advances. Fracture Reduction and Fixation Techniques: Upper Extremities, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-68628-8 ↗
34. Third generation poly (hydroxyacid) composite scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1002/jbm.b.33674 ↗
35. Ana, I.D., Satria, G.A.P., Dewi, A.H., and Ardhani, R. (2018). Bioceramics for clinical application in regenerative dentistry. Novel Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-0947-2_16 ↗
36. Kaou, M.H., Furkó, M., Balázsi, K., and Balázsi, C. (2023). Advanced Bioactive Glasses: The Newest Achievements and Breakthroughs in the Area. Nanomaterials, 13.10.3390/nano13162287 ↗
38. Osteogenic effect of a biodegradable BMP-2 hydrogel injected into a cannulated mg screw10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00709 ↗
39. Pharmaceutical electrospinning and 3D printing scaffold design for bone regeneration10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.007 ↗
40. Maruyama, M., Rhee, C., Utsunomiya, T., Zhang, N., Ueno, M., Yao, Z., and Goodman, S.B. (2020). Modulation of the inflammatory response and bone healing. Front. Endocrinol., 11.10.3389/fendo.2020.00386 ↗
41. Introduction of a novel guided bone regeneration memory shape-based device10.1002/jbm.b.34402 ↗
42. Yu, L., and Wei, M. (2021). Biomineralization of collagen-based materials for hard tissue repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22020944 ↗
43. Choi, I.O., Oh, J.S., Yu, S.J., Kim, B.O., and Lee, W.P. (2021). Retrospective analysis of the effect of three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh on peri-implant non-contained horizontal defects in 100 consecutive cases. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11020872 ↗
44. Ca ions chelation, collagen I incorporation and 3D bionic PLGA/PCL electrospun architecture to enhance osteogenic differentiation10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109300 ↗
45. Influence of calcium phosphates incorporation into poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) electrospun membranes for guided bone regeneration10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109253 ↗
46. Biomimetic bone regeneration using angle-ply collagen membrane-supported cell sheets subjected to mechanical conditioning10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.041 ↗
47. Lu, Q., Han, W.J., and Choi, H.J. (2018). Smart and functional conducting polymers: Application to electrorheological fluids. Molecules, 23.10.3390/molecules23112854 ↗
48. Biomimetic nanosilica–collagen scaffolds for in situ bone regeneration: Toward a cell-free, one-step surgery10.1002/adma.201904341 ↗
49. Microporous methacrylated glycol chitosan-montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering10.1038/s41467-019-11511-3 ↗
50. Potentiation of transforming growth factor (TGF-β1) by natural coral and fibrin in a rabbit cranioplasty model10.1007/BF00334331 ↗
51. Rapid mineralization of hierarchical poly (l-lactic acid)/poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffolds by electrodeposition for bone regeneration10.2147/IJN.S205194 ↗
52. Rieger, B., Künkel, A., Coates, G.W., Reichardt, R., Dinjus, E., and Zevaco, T.A. (2012). Synthetic Biodegradable Polymers, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-27154-0 ↗
53. Biodegradable magnesium alloys as temporary orthopaedic implants: A review10.1007/s10534-019-00170-y ↗
54. Leonés, A., Peponi, L., Fiori, S., and Lieblich, M. (2022). Effect of the Addition of MgO Nanoparticles on the Thermally-Activated Shape Memory Behavior of Plasticized PLA Electrospun Fibers. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14132657 ↗
55. Leonés, A., Salaris, V., Peponi, L., Lieblich, M., Muñoz-Bonilla, A., Fernández-García, M., and López, D. (2024). Bioactivity and Antibacterial Analysis of Plasticized PLA Electrospun Fibers Reinforced with MgO and Mg(OH)2 Nanoparticles. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16121727 ↗
56. Predicting and Investigating Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles by Translucent Machine Learning10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130164 ↗
57. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
58. A User’s Guide to Machine Learning for Polymeric Biomaterials10.1021/acspolymersau.2c00037 ↗
59. Woźniacki, A., Książek, W., and Mrowczyk, P. (2024). A Novel Approach for Predicting the Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning Techniques and Advanced Parameter Optimization Methods. Cancers, 16.10.3390/cancers16183205 ↗
60. Pałka, F., Książek, W., Pławiak, P., Romaszewski, M., and Książek, K. (2021). Hyperspectral Classification of Blood-Like Substances Using Machine Learning Methods Combined with Genetic Algorithms in Transductive and Inductive Scenarios. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21072293 ↗
61. (2009). Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity (Standard No. ISO 10993-5:2009).