journal article·2025-07-11Open access

Evaluation of Technical and Anthropometric Factors in Postures and Muscle Activation of Heavy-Truck Vehicle Drivers: Implications for the Design of Ergonomic Cabins

Esteban Ortiz, Daysi Baño-Morales, William Venegas, Álvaro Page, Skarlet Guerra, Mateo Narváez, Iván Zambrano

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

This study investigates how three technical factors—steering wheel tilt, torque, and cabin vibration frequency—affect driver posture. Heavy-truck drivers often suffer from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), mainly due to poor cabin ergonomics and prolonged postures during work. In countries like Ecuador, making major structural changes to cabin design is not feasible. These factors were identified through video analysis and surveys from drivers at two Ecuadorian trucking companies. An experimental system was developed using a simplified cabin to control these variables, while posture and muscle activity were recorded in 16 participants using motion capture, inertial sensors, and electromyography (EMG) on the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, triceps brachii, quadriceps muscle, and gastrocnemius muscle. The test protocol simulated key truck-driving tasks. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (p<0.05), with technical factors and mass index as independent variables, and posture metrics as dependent variables. Results showed that head mass index significantly affected head abduction–adduction (−8.12 to −2.18°), and spine mass index influenced spine flexion–extension (−0.38 to 6.99°). Among technical factors, steering wheel tilt impacted trunk flexion–extension (−13.56 to 16.99°) and arm rotation (−31.1 to 19.7°). Steering wheel torque affected arm rotation (−30.49 to −6.77°), while vibration frequency influenced forearm flexion–extension (3.76 to 16.51°). EMG signals showed little variation between muscles, likely due to the protocol’s short duration. These findings offer quantitative support for improving cabin ergonomics in low-resource settings through targeted, cost-effective design changes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Effects of Vibration on Health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito 170517, Ecuador

Grupo de Ingeniería Automotriz, Movilidad y Transporte (GiAUTO), Carrera de Ingeniería Automotriz-Campus Sur, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito 170702, Ecuador

Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería Mecánica y Biomecánica, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain

Funding

Estudio de los riesgos ergonómicos y la fatiga muscular en los conductores de transporte pesado realizado en La Escuela Politécnica Nacional

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Driving Fatigue in Professional Drivers: A Survey of Truck and Taxi Drivers10.1080/15389588.2014.973945 ↗
2. Ergonomic considerations for designing truck drivers’ seats: The case of Bangladesh10.1539/joh.16-0163-OA ↗
3. Correlation of Heavy-Truck Driver Fatigue with Vehicle-Based Control Measures
4. Low back pain in drivers exposed to whole body vibration: Analysis of a dose–response pattern10.1136/oem.2007.035147 ↗
5. Whole Body Vibration Exposures and Health Status among Professional Truck Drivers: A Cross-sectional Analysis10.1093/annhyg/mew040 ↗
6. Assessment of biomechanical demands and discomfort in drivers to stablish design criteria for truck seats10.1007/s12008-016-0325-4 ↗
7. Comparison of whole-body vibration exposures in buses: Effects and interactions of bus and seat design10.1080/00140139.2014.961568 ↗
8. Acute effects of whole-body vibration on trunk and neck muscle activity in consideration of different vibration loads
9. The impact of different seats and whole-body vibration exposures on truck driver vigilance and discomfort10.1080/00140139.2017.1372638 ↗
10. Adoption of ergonomic features in a new reach truck cabin design—A usability study
11. U.S. Truck Driver Anthropometric Study and Multivariate Anthropometric Models for Cab Designs10.1177/0018720812442685 ↗
12. Mendes, H.G.O., de Moraes Tomaz, B., Coelho-Oliveira, A.C., de Freitas, J.P., Moura-Fernandes, M.C., de Souza-Gama, M.A., Salustiano da Silva, F.J., Francisca-Santos, A., Ferreira-Souza, L.F., and Seixas, A. (2021). The Consequences of Mechanical Vibration Exposure on the Lower Back of Bus Drivers: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11219986 ↗
13. Optimization of Truck Driver Cab Ergonomic for Commercial Truck Based on Ramsis: Enhancing Driver Comfort and Safety
14. A biomechanical investigation of forces applied to the lift truck steering wheel: Effects of posture, gender and hand contact on cumulative low back loading10.1080/14639221003753284 ↗
15. Human Body Size for Truck Cab Design
16. Witsenboer, T.P. (2015). Influence of Steering System Imperfections on Truck Steering Feel. [Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology].
17. Inter and intra-individual differences in steering wheel hand positions during a simulated driving taskdriving task10.1080/00140139.2014.978899 ↗
18. Correlation of Steering Behavior with Heavy-Truck Driver Fatigue
19. Driver hand position on the steering wheel while merging into motorway traffic10.1016/j.trf.2009.12.003 ↗
20. Muscle contraction during maneuvering steering wheel using surface electromyography10.37268/mjphm/vol.20/no.Special1/art.698 ↗
21. Nacpil, E.J.C., Wang, Z., Zheng, R., Kaizuka, T., and Nakano, K. (2019). Design and Evaluation of a Surface Electromyography-Controlled Steering Assistance Interface. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19061308 ↗
22. Xu, J., Xin, T., Gao, C., and Sun, Z. (2025). Study on the Maximum Safe Instantaneous Input of the Steering Wheel against Rollover for Trucks on Horizontal Curves. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19042025 ↗
23. Interaction of vehicle and steering system regarding on-centre handlinghandling10.1080/00423110701416519 ↗
24. Whole-body Vibration Exposure Intervention among Professional Bus and Truck Drivers: A Laboratory Evaluation of Seat-suspension Designs10.1080/15459624.2014.989357 ↗
25. A Longitudinal Study of Low Back Pain and Daily Vibration Exposure in Professional Drivers10.2486/indhealth.MSWBVI-02 ↗
26. Whole body vibration exposures in bus drivers: A comparison between a high-floor coach and a low-floor city bus10.1016/j.ergon.2012.10.003 ↗
27. (1997). Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirements (Standard No. ISO 2631-1:1997).
28. (2018). Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 5: Method for Evaluation of Vibration Containing Multiple Shocks (Standard No. ISO 2631-5:2018).
29. McConville, J., Clauser, C., Churchill, T., Cuzzi, J., and Kaleps, I. (1981). Anthropometric Relationships of Body and Body Segment Moments of Inertia, Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Aerospace Medical Division, Air Force Systems Command. Technical Report.10.21236/ADA097238 ↗
30. Winter, D. (2009). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, Wiley. [4th ed.].10.1002/9780470549148 ↗