Multimodal Hidden Markov Models for Real-Time Human Proficiency Assessment in Industry 5.0: Integrating Physiological, Behavioral, and Subjective Metrics
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a Multimodal Hidden Markov Model (MHMM) framework specifically designed for real-time human proficiency assessment, integrating physiological (Heart Rate Variability (HRV)), behavioral (Task Completion Time (TCT)), and subjective (NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)) data streams to infer latent human proficiency states in industrial settings. Using published empirical data from the surgical training literature, a comprehensive simulation study was conducted, with the MHMM (Trained) achieving 92.5% classification accuracy, significantly outperforming unimodal Hidden Markov Model (HMM) variants 61–63.9% and demonstrating competitive performance with advanced models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks 90%, and Conditional Random Field (CRF) 88.5%. The framework exhibited robustness across stress-test scenarios, including sensor noise, missing data, and imbalanced class distributions. A key advantage of the MHMM over black-box approaches is its interpretability by providing quantifiable transition probabilities that reveal learning rates, forgetting patterns, and contextual influences on proficiency dynamics. The model successfully captures context-dependent effects, including task complexity and cumulative fatigue, through dynamic transition matrices. When demonstrated through simulation, this framework establishes a foundation for developing adaptive operator-AI collaboration systems in Industry 5.0 environments. The MHMM’s combination of high accuracy, robustness, and interpretability makes it a promising candidate for future empirical validation in real-world industrial, healthcare, and training applications in which it is critical to understand and support human proficiency development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Ergonomics and Human Factors · Occupational Health and Safety Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
Department of Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Sun, S., Zheng, X., Gong, B., Paredes, J.G., and Ordieres-Meré, J. (2020). Healthy Operator 4.0: A Human Cyber–Physical System Architecture for Smart Workplaces. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20072011 ↗
2. Yitmen, İ., Almusaed, A., and Alizadehsalehi, S. (2023). Investigating the Causal Relationships Among Enablers of the Construction 5.0 Paradigm: Integration of Operator 5.0 and Society 5.0 with Human-Centricity, Sustainability, and Resilience. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15119105 ↗
3. Zakeri, Z., Arif, A., Omurtag, A., Breedon, P., and Khalid, A. (2023). Multimodal assessment of cognitive workload using neural, subjective and behavioural measures in smart factory settings. Sensors, 23.10.20944/preprints202310.0948.v1 ↗
4. Applications of Collaborative Robots in Agile Manufacturing: A Review10.21595/rsa.2023.23238 ↗
5. Transition to Industry 5.0 With Ai and Digilitalization of Production Systems10.7251/JEM2402008B ↗
6. State of science: Mental workload in ergonomics10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 ↗
7. Virtual reality in manufacturing: Immersive and collaborative artificial-reality in design of human-robot workspace10.1080/0951192X.2019.1690685 ↗
8. Wickens, C.D., Helton, W.S., Hollands, J.G., and Banbury, S. (2021). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Routledge.10.4324/9781003177616 ↗
9. Subjective rating scales: Science or art?10.1080/00140130210166951 ↗
10. Cardiovascular psychophysiology10.1017/CBO9780511546396.008 ↗
11. Multiple resources and mental workload10.1518/001872008X288394 ↗
12. Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028 ↗
13. Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.003 ↗
14. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: The surgery task load index (SURG-TLX)10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4 ↗
15. The psychometrics of mental workload: Multiple measures are sensitive but divergent10.1177/0018720814539505 ↗
16. Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs10.1518/155534308X284417 ↗
17. Multimodal fusion for objective assessment of cognitive workload: A review10.1109/TCYB.2019.2939399 ↗
18. Measuring Growth in Students’ Proficiency in MOOCs: Two Component Dynamic Extensions for the Rasch Model10.3758/s13428-018-1129-1 ↗
19. Activity Recognition for Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Subjects Using Hidden Markov Models10.1109/JSEN.2018.2845749 ↗
20. Determining Novice and Expert Status in Human-Automation Interaction Through Hidden Markov Models10.1080/08839514.2024.2402174 ↗
21. Heart Rate Variability as an Indicator of Stress in Students’ Athletes10.4236/ojmp.2023.123009 ↗
22. The Relationship Between Task Difficulty and Second Language Fluency in French: A Mixed Methods Approach10.1111/modl.12186 ↗
23. Task Completion Time: Objective Tool for Assessment of Technical Skills in Laparoscopic Simulator for Urology Trainees10.4103/0970-1591.38601 ↗
24. Physiological correlates of cognitive load in laparoscopic surgery
25. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition10.1177/0270467604264992 ↗
26. Blum, T., Padoy, N., Feußner, H., and Navab, N. (2008). Modeling and online recognition of surgical phases using hidden markov models. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2008: 11th International Conference, New York, NY, USA, 6–10 September 2008, Springer. Proceedings, Part II 11.
27. Wang, H., Chen, D., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Qiao, Y., Xiao, J., Xie, N., and Fan, H. (2023). Assessment of vigilance level during work: Fitting a hidden Markov model to heart rate variability. Brain Sci., 13.10.3390/brainsci13040638 ↗
28. Fitts, P.M., and Posner, M.I. (1967). Human Performance, Brooks/Cole.
29. Arcelay, I., Goti, A., Oyarbide-Zubillaga, A., Akyazi, T., Celaya, E.A., and Bringas, P.G. (2021). Definition of the Future Skills Needs of Job Profiles in the Renewable Energy Sector. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14092609 ↗
30. Industry 5.0 or Industry 4.0S? Introduction to Industry 4.0 and a Peek Into the Prospective Industry 5.0 Technologies10.1007/s12008-023-01217-8 ↗
31. The Impacts of Human-Cobot Collaboration on Perceived Cognitive Load and Usability During an Industrial Task: An Exploratory Experiment10.1080/24725838.2022.2072021 ↗
32. Paulíková, A., Babeľová, Z.G., and Ubárová, M. (2021). Analysis of the Impact of Human-Cobot Collaborative Manufacturing Implementation on the Occupational Health and Safety and the Quality Requirements. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18041927 ↗
33. Dcruz, D., Thomas, A., and Murphy, L. (2023). Identifying the Fit-for-Purpose Leadership for the Manufacturing Organizations in the Era of Industry 5.0—A Literature Review. Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXVI, IOS Press.10.3233/ATDE230894 ↗
34. Kumar, S. (2024). Introductory Chapter: Welding in the Era of Industry 5.0. Welding-Materials, Fabrication Processes, and Industry 5.0., IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.1003918 ↗
35. Lepenioti, K., Pertselakis, M., Bousdekis, A., Louca, A., Lampathaki, F., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G., and Anastasiou, S. (2020). Machine Learning for Predictive and Prescriptive Analytics of Operational Data in Smart Manufacturing. Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, Proceedings of the CAiSE 2020 International Workshops, Grenoble, France, 8–12 June 2020, Springer International Publishing. Proceedings 32.10.1007/978-3-030-49165-9_1 ↗
36. Truong, N.C.D., Wang, X., and Liu, H. (2023). Temporal and Spectral Analyses of EEG Microstate Reveals Neural Effects of Transcranial Photobiomodulation on the Resting Brain. Front. Neurosci., 17.10.3389/fnins.2023.1247290 ↗
37. Evaluation of subjective mental workload: A comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00161.x ↗
38. The Effects of Acute Exercise on Cognitive Performance: A Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.068 ↗
39. Bartsch, R.P., Liu, K.K.L., Bashan, A., and Ivanov, P.C. (2015). Network Physiology: How Organ Systems Dynamically Interact. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0142143 ↗
40. The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Model Modified by Cognitive Load Theory on Mathematical Problem Solving Skills10.18326/hipotenusa.v2i2.41-55 ↗
41. Systematic Review of Measurement Tools to Assess Surgeons’ Intraoperative Cognitive Workload10.1002/bjs.10795 ↗
42. The Impact of Contextual Information and a Secondary Task on Anticipation Performance: An Interpretation Using Cognitive Load Theory10.1002/acp.3386 ↗
43. Simulation-based Bronchoscopy Training: Randomized Trial Comparing Worked Example to Video Introduction10.1002/ppul.26648 ↗
44. Worry and Cognitive Control Predict Course Trajectories of Anxiety in Older Adults With Late-Life Depression10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.002 ↗
45. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 ↗
46. Rostami, F., Babaei-Pouya, A., Teimori-Boghsani, G., Jahangirimehr, A., Mehri, Z., and Feiz-Arefi, M. (2021). Mental workload and job satisfaction in healthcare workers: The moderating role of job control. Front. Public Health, 9.10.3389/fpubh.2021.683388 ↗
47. Collaborative Writing in L2 Contexts: Processes, Outcomes, and Future Directions10.1017/S0267190511000079 ↗
48. Boumann, H., Hamann, A., Biella, M., Carstengerdes, N., and Sammito, S. (2023). Suitability of physiological, self-report and behavioral measures for assessing mental workload in pilots. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-35392-5_1 ↗
49. Adamolekun, A., Logah, F.X., Alabi, C., Baanye, J., Wilson, M., Ganiu, O., Seong, Y., and Yi, S. (2025, June 25). Toward a Unified Framework for Multimodal Cognitive Workload Assessment in Human-machine Interaction Systems. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5235980.10.2139/ssrn.5235980 ↗
50. Sriranga, A.K., Lu, Q., and Birrell, S. (2023). A systematic review of in-vehicle physiological indices and sensor technology for driver mental workload monitoring. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23042214 ↗
51. Huang, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, T., Wang, T., and Tao, D. (2024). Assessment of drivers’ mental workload by multimodal measures during auditory-based dual-task driving scenarios. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24031041 ↗
52. Zen, H., and Sak, H. (2015, January 19–24). Unidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network With Recurrent Output Layer for Low-Latency Speech Synthesis. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178816 ↗
53. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
54. Conditional Random Fields for Image Labeling
55. Wu, Y., Yu, C.H., Cai, B.B., Qin, S.J., Gao, F., and Wen, Q. (2019). Quantum Conditional Random Field. arXiv.
56. Rudovic, O., Pavlović, V., and Pantić, M. (2012). Kernel Conditional Ordinal Random Fields for Temporal Segmentation of Facial Action Units. European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-33868-7_26 ↗
57. Ghojogh, B., Karray, F., and Crowley, M. (2025, June 25). Hidden Markov Model: Tutorial. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382134823_Hidden_Markov_Model_Tutorial.10.31219/osf.io/dwcjv ↗
58. Formal error bounds for the state space reduction of Markov chains10.1016/j.peva.2024.102464 ↗
59. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition10.1109/5.18626 ↗
60. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm10.1109/TIT.1967.1054010 ↗
61. Sharma, K., Papamitsiou, Z., Olsen, J.K., and Giannakos, M. (2020, January 23–27). Predicting learners’ effortful behaviour in adaptive assessment using multimodal data. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Frankfurt, Germany.10.1145/3375462.3375498 ↗
62. Zheng, Y., Que, Y., Hu, X., and Hsiao, J.H. (2022). Predicting reading performance based on eye movement analysis with hidden Markov models. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Bucharest, Romania, 1–4 July 2022, IEEE.10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00058 ↗
63. Wu, Z., Zhang, M., Xiao, L., and Lv, X. (2025, June 25). A Driving Fatigue Identification Method Based on HMM. Available online: https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2020-01-0112/.10.4271/2020-01-5159 ↗
64. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x ↗
65. A probabilistic distance measure for hidden Markov models10.1002/j.1538-7305.1985.tb00439.x ↗
66. Modeling activity times by the Parkinson distribution with a lognormal core: Theory and validation10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.054 ↗
67. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043 ↗
68. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate10.1177/2053951716679679 ↗
69. Gao, L., Wang, C., and Wu, G. (2023). Hidden Semi-Markov Models-Based Visual Perceptual State Recognition for Pilots. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23146418 ↗
70. Breque, M., De Nul, L., and Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
71. Towards the resilient operator 5.0: The future of work in smart resilient manufacturing systems10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.183 ↗
72. Continuous monitoring of vital signs using wearable devices on the general ward: Pilot study10.2196/mhealth.7208 ↗
73. Objective assessment of surgical technical skill and competency in the operating room10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044435 ↗
74. Hernández-Sabaté, A., Yauri, J., Folch, P., Piera, M.À., and Gil, D. (2022). Recognition of the mental workloads of pilots in the cockpit using EEG signals. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052298 ↗
75. Masi, G., Amprimo, G., Ferraris, C., and Priano, L. (2023). Stress and workload assessment in aviation—A narrative review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23073556 ↗
76. Symbiotic human-robot collaborative assembly10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.002 ↗
77. Advanced, analytic, automated (AAA) measurement of engagement during learning10.1080/00461520.2017.1281747 ↗
78. Identifying Risk Factors for Compassion Fatigue in Psychologists in Aotearoa, New Zealand, During the COVID-19 Pandemic10.1037/pro0000538 ↗
79. Frías, C.E., Samarasinghe, N., Cuzco, C., Koorankot, J., de Juan, A., Ali Rudwan, H.M., Rahim, H.F.A., Zabalegui, A., Tulley, I., and Al-Harahsheh, S.T. (2025). Strategies to Support the Mental Health and Well-Being of Health and Care Workforce: A Rapid Review of Reviews. Front. Med., 12.10.3389/fmed.2025.1530287 ↗
80. Organizational Factors to Optimize Mental Health Nurses’ Wellbeing in the Workplace: An Integrative Literature Review
81. The Community, the Workplace, and Public Health Measures: A Qualitative Study of Factors That Impacted the Wellbeing of Rural Health Service Staff in Victoria, Australia, During the COVID-19 Pandemic10.1155/2023/5556980 ↗
82. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning10.1145/3457607 ↗