Comparison of Finger Flexor Strength and Muscle Quality Between Climbers and Non-Climbers: Influence of Sex and Grip Type
Source abstract
Abstract
Climbing demands exceptional isometric finger flexor strength and neuromuscular efficiency. This study aimed to compare maximum isometric strength and muscle quality (MQ) between climbers and non-climbers and examine the influence of sex and specific grip types. Methods: 33 climbers (14 women) and 29 non-climbers (15 women) volunteered in this study. Maximum isometric strength was measured for handgrip, three-finger drag, and half-crimp grips, while forearm muscle mass was estimated using DXA. MQ was calculated as the ratio of peak isometric force to forearm muscle mass. Results: Climbers demonstrated significantly higher isometric strength in both the three-finger drag and half-crimp grips compared to non-climbers (p < 0.01); however, non-significant differences were observed in handgrip strength. Despite similar forearm muscle mass, climbers exhibited greater MQ. Notably, female non-climbers showed higher MQ than their male counterparts (p < 0.05), a sex difference that was not evident among climbers. All tests exhibited high repeatability (ICC > 0.93, CV < 5.81%) with low SEM and MDC95 values. Conclusions: The findings underscore the necessity of employing climbing-specific strength assessments to capture the unique neuromuscular adaptations induced by climbing training. Muscle quality emerges as a sex-neutral biomarker for strength performance evaluation, with potential applications in the optimization of training programs. Future research should further explore the predictive value of MQ and strive for standardized testing protocols.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Meat and Animal Product Quality · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences and Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, 24007 León, Spain
i+HeALTH, Strategic Research Group, European University Miguel de Cervantes (UEMC), 47012 Valladolid, Spain
Department of Physical Education and Research Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences (IUIBS), University of Las Palmas Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
Funding
Consejería de Universidades, Ciencia, Innovación y Cultura del Gobierno de Canarias
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Determinants for success in climbing: A systematic review10.1016/j.jesf.2019.04.002 ↗
2. Assmann, M., Steinmetz, G., Schilling, A.F., and Saul, D. (2020). Comparison of Grip Strength in Recreational Climbers and Non-Climbing Athletes-A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18010129 ↗
3. A comparison of the anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of female elite and recreational climbers and non-climbers10.1080/026404101750238953 ↗
4. Determinant factors in climbing ability: Influence of strength, anthropometry, and neuromuscular fatigue10.1111/sms.12558 ↗
5. Rate of force development and maximal force: Reliability and difference between non-climbers, skilled and international climbers10.1080/14763141.2019.1584236 ↗
6. Motor unit activation strategy during a sustained isometric contraction of finger flexor muscles in elite climbers10.1080/02640414.2015.1035738 ↗
7. Physiological determinants of climbing-specific finger endurance and sport rock climbing performance10.1080/02640410600944550 ↗
8. Anthropometry and performance characteristics of recreational advanced to elite female rock climbers10.1080/02640414.2020.1804784 ↗
9. Hand–arm strength and endurance as predictors of climbing performance10.1080/17461391.2010.546431 ↗
10. Analysis of Tests Evaluating Sport Climbers’ Strength and Isometric Endurance10.1515/hukin-2016-0027 ↗
11. Reliability and Validity of Functional Grip Strength Measures Across Holds and Body Positions in Climbers: Associations With Skill and Climbing Performance10.1080/02701367.2022.2035662 ↗
12. Stien, N., Saeterbakken, A.H., and Andersen, V. (2022). Tests and Procedures for Measuring Endurance, Strength, and Power in Climbing-A Mini-Review. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4.10.3389/fspor.2022.847447 ↗
13. Assessing climbing-specific strength: The impact of body position and elbow flexion on reliability and predictive validity10.1080/02640414.2025.2477863 ↗
14. Validity and Reliability of Finger-Strength Testing in 6 Common Grip Techniques for the Assessment of Bouldering Ability in Men10.1123/ijspp.2023-0129 ↗
15. Effect of hold depth and grip technique on maximal finger forces in rock climbing10.1080/02640414.2012.658845 ↗
16. Influence of Experience, Training Frequency, and Sex on Climbing-Specific Grip Force in Rock Climbers of Varying Skill Level10.1123/jab.2024-0056 ↗
17. Estimation of finger muscle tendon tensions and pulley forces during specific sport-climbing grip techniques10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.08.027 ↗
18. Kinetics of crimp and slope grip in rock climbing10.1123/jab.27.2.116 ↗
19. Reliability and Validity of Finger Strength and Endurance Measurements in Rock Climbing10.1080/02701367.2018.1441484 ↗
20. Differences in climbing-specific strength between boulder and lead rock climbers10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182577026 ↗
21. Muscle strength and endurance in high-level rock climbers10.1080/14763141.2021.1916577 ↗
22. Langer, K., Simon, C., and Wiemeyer, J. (2023). Physical performance testing in climbing-A systematic review. Front. Sports Act. Living, 5.10.3389/fspor.2023.1130812 ↗
23. How to assess functional status: A new muscle quality index10.1007/s12603-012-0004-5 ↗
24. It is not just muscle mass: A review of muscle quality, composition and metabolism during ageing as determinants of muscle function and mobility in later life10.1186/2046-2395-3-9 ↗
25. Naimo, M.A., Varanoske, A.N., Hughes, J.M., and Pasiakos, S.M. (2021). Skeletal Muscle Quality: A Biomarker for Assessing Physical Performance Capabilities in Young Populations. Front. Physiol., 12.10.3389/fphys.2021.706699 ↗
26. Physical and Physiological Determinants of Rock Climbing10.1123/ijspp.2018-0901 ↗
27. Augste, C., Winkler, M., and Künzell, S. (2022). Optimization of an Intermittent Finger Endurance Test for Climbers Regarding Gender and Deviation in Force and Pulling Time. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4.10.3389/fspor.2022.902521 ↗
28. Heart Rate Response, Duration, Grip Strength, and Anthropometric Characteristics in Recreational Indoor Rock Climbers10.1519/JSC.0000000000003540 ↗
29. Climbing time to exhaustion is a determinant of climbing performance in high-level sport climbers10.1007/s00421-009-1155-x ↗
30. Sex and population-specific cutoff values of muscle quality index: Results from NHANES 2011–201410.1016/j.clnu.2022.04.026 ↗
31. Muscle quality index comparisons between Hispanics and non-Hispanic Caucasians using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and handgrip strength10.1038/s41430-024-01484-y ↗
32. Comparative grading scales, statistical analyses, climber descriptors and ability grouping: International Rock Climbing Research Association position statement10.1080/19346182.2015.1107081 ↗
33. The thumb during the crimp grip10.1055/s-0030-1267230 ↗
34. The role of arm position during finger flexor strength measurement in sport climbers10.1080/24748668.2014.11868726 ↗
35. Climbing-specific finger flexor performance and forearm muscle oxygenation in elite male and female sport climbers10.1007/s00421-011-2260-1 ↗
36. Ultrasound evaluation of stress injuries and physiological adaptations in the fingers of adolescent competitive rock climbers10.1007/s00247-017-4033-4 ↗
37. Exploring forearm muscle coordination and training applications of various grip positions during maximal isometric finger dead-hangs in rock climbers10.7717/peerj.15464 ↗
38. Athletic profile of highly accomplished boulderers10.1016/j.wem.2010.11.012 ↗
39. Determinants of Climbing Performance: When Finger Flexor Strength and Endurance Count10.1519/JSC.0000000000003545 ↗
40. Body Composition, Anthropometric Parameters, and Strength-Endurance Characteristics of Sport Climbers: A Systematic Review10.1519/JSC.0000000000004464 ↗
41. Physiological Characteristics, Dietary Intake, and Supplement Use in Sport Climbing10.1007/s13668-023-00511-x ↗
42. Carrasco, F., Arias-Tellez, M.J., Solar-Altamirano, I., Inostroza, J., and Carrasco, G. (2024). Regional Body Composition and Strength, Not Total Body Composition, Are Determinants of Performance in Climbers. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., 9.10.3390/jfmk9040228 ↗
43. Physiology of difficult rock climbing10.1007/s00421-003-1036-7 ↗
44. The physiology of rock climbing10.2165/00007256-200636060-00006 ↗
45. Mermier, C.M., Janot, J.M., Parker, D.L., and Swan, J.G. (2000). Physiological and anthropometric determinants of sport climbing performance. Br. J. Sports Med., 34.10.1136/bjsm.34.5.359 ↗
46. Sex-based differences in skeletal muscle kinetics and fiber-type composition10.1152/physiol.00024.2014 ↗
47. Evaluation of sex-based differences in resistance exercise training-induced changes in muscle mass, strength, and physical performance in healthy older (≥60 y) adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.arr.2023.102023 ↗