YOLO-PWSL-Enhanced Robotic Fish: An Integrated Object Detection System for Underwater Monitoring
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, China has been promoting aquaculture, but extensive water pollution caused by production activities and climate changes has resulted in losses exceeding 4.6 × 107 kg of aquatic products. Widespread water pollution from production activities is a key issue that needs to be addressed in the aquaculture industry. Therefore, dynamic monitoring of water quality and fish-specific solutions are critical to the growth of fry. Here, a low-cost, small, and real-time monitorable bionic robotic fish based on YOLO-PWSL (PConv, Wise-ShapeIoU, and LGFB) is proposed to achieve intelligent control of aquaculture. The bionic robotic fish incorporates a caudal fin for propulsion and adaptive buoyancy control for precise depth regulation. It is equipped with various types of sensors and wireless transmission equipment, which enables managers to monitor water parameters in real time. It is also equipped with YOLO-PWSL, an improved underwater fish identification model based on YOLOv5s. YOLO-PWSL integrates three key enhancements. In fact, we designed a multilevel attention fusion block (LGFB) that enhances perception in complex scenarios, to optimize the accuracy of the detected frames, the Wise-ShapeIoU loss function was used, and in order to reduce the parameters and FLOPs of the model, a lightweight convolution method called PConv was introduced. The experimental results show that it exhibits excellent performance compared with the original model: the mAP@0.5 (mean average precision at the 0.5 IoU threshold) of the improved model reached 96.1%, the number of parameters and the amount of calculation were reduced by 1.8 M and 3.1 G, respectively, and the detected leakage was effectively reduced. In the future, the system will facilitate the monitoring of water quality and fish species and their behavior, thereby improving the efficiency of aquaculture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring Technologies · Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Advanced Neural Network Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Funding
National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Shi, Z., Xue, D., and Xu, J. (2025). Global Marine Product Space and Coastal Countries’ Productive Capabilities, 1995–2021. Land, 14.10.3390/land14020378 ↗
2. Qin, A., and Ning, D. (2025). Developments, Applications, and Innovations in Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnologies. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15084381 ↗
3. Biodiversity—The Cornerstone of Sustainable Aquaculture Development: Insights From the Breeding of Approved Fish Varieties for Aquaculture From 1996 to 2024 in China10.1111/raq.70003 ↗
4. Wang, Q., Liu, H., and Sui, J. (2018). Mariculture: Developments, present status and prospects. Aquaculture in China: Success Stories and Modern Trends, Wiley.10.1002/9781119120759.ch1_3 ↗
5. Aquaculture Wastewater Pollution and Purification Technology in China: Research Progress
6. Ubina, N.A., and Cheng, S.-C. (2022). A Review of Unmanned System Technologies with Its Application to Aquaculture Farm Monitoring and Management. Drones, 6.10.3390/drones6010012 ↗
7. Parra, L., Sendra, S., Garcia, L., and Lloret, J. (2024). Smart Low-Cost Control System for Fish Farm Facilities. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14146244 ↗
8. Mobile robot localization: Current challenges and future prospective10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100651 ↗
9. Huang, Y.-P., and Khabusi, S.P. (2025). Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) Advances in Aquaculture: A Review. Processes, 13.10.3390/pr13010073 ↗
10. Davis, A., Wills, P.S., Garvey, J.E., Fairman, W., Karim, M.A., and Ouyang, B. (2023). Developing and Field Testing Path Planning for Robotic Aquaculture Water Quality Monitoring. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13052805 ↗
11. Ullah, I., Ali, F., Sharafian, A., Ali, A., Naeem, H.Y., and Bai, X. (2024). Optimizing underwater connectivity through multi-attribute decision-making for underwater IoT deployments using remote sensing technologies. Front. Mar. Sci., 11.10.3389/fmars.2024.1468481 ↗
12. Ma, F., Fan, Z., Nikolaeva, A., and Bao, H. (2025). Redefining Aquaculture Safety with Artificial Intelligence: Design Innovations, Trends, and Future Perspectives. Fishes, 10.10.3390/fishes10030088 ↗
13. Ma, S., Zhao, Q., Ding, M., Zhang, M., Zhao, L., Huang, C., Zhang, J., Liang, X., Yuan, J., and Wang, X. (2023). A Review of Robotic Fish Based on Smart Materials. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8020227 ↗
14. A dynamic model for underwater robotic fish with a servo actuated pectoral fin10.1007/s42452-019-0679-x ↗
15. Design, Modeling, and Control of Biomimetic Fish Robot: A Review10.1007/s42235-019-0111-7 ↗
16. Wang, J. (2014). Robotic Fish: Development, Modeling, and Application to Mobile Sensing, ProQuest.
17. Design of a monitoring system for robotic fish in underwater environment
18. Design of a Bio-Inspired Autonomous Underwater Robot10.1007/s10846-017-0678-3 ↗
19. Chen, X., Li, D., Mo, D., Cui, Z., Li, X., Lian, H., and Gong, M. (2023). Three-Dimensional Printed Biomimetic Robotic Fish for Dynamic Monitoring of Water Quality in Aquaculture. Micromachines, 14.10.3390/mi14081578 ↗
20. Zhao, D., Lu, K., and Qian, W. (2025). Hydrodynamic Resistance Analysis of Large Biomimetic Yellow Croaker Model: Effects of Shape, Body Length, and Material Based on CFD. Fluids, 10.10.3390/fluids10050107 ↗
21. Huang, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Kong, X., Liu, B., and Jiang, S. (2024). Compatibilities of Cyprinus carpio with Varied Colors of Robotic Fish. Fishes, 9.10.3390/fishes9060211 ↗
22. Tanev, I. (2025). Speed and Energy Efficiency of a Fish Robot Featuring Exponential Patterns of Control. Actuators, 14.10.3390/act14030119 ↗
23. Nayoun, M.N.I., Hossain, S.A., Rezaul, K.M., Siddiquee, K.N.e.A., Islam, M.S., and Jannat, T. (2024). Internet of Things-Driven Precision in Fish Farming: A Deep Dive into Automated Temperature, Oxygen, and pH Regulation. Computers, 13.10.3390/computers13100267 ↗
24. Misbahuddin, M., Cokrowati, N., Iqbal, M.S., Farobie, O., Amrullah, A., and Ernawati, L. (2025). Kalman Filter-Enhanced Data Aggregation in LoRaWAN-Based IoT Framework for Aquaculture Monitoring in Sargassum sp. Cultivation. Computers, 14.10.3390/computers14040151 ↗
25. Hussain, A., Hussain, T., Ullah, I., Muminov, B., Khan, M.Z., Alfarraj, O., and Gafar, A. (2023). CR-NBEER: Cooperative-Relay Neighboring-Based Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Marine Underwater Sensor Networks. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11071474 ↗
26. Wei, L., Dragomir, A., Dumitru, E., Christian, S., Scott, R., Cheng-Yang, F., and Berg, A.C. (2016). Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.
27. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
28. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., and Malik, J. (2013). Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
29. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 ↗
30. Girshick, R. (2015, January 7–13). Fast R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
31. Khan, S., Ullah, I., Ali, F., Shafiq, M., Ghadi, Y.Y., and Kim, T. (2023). Deep learning-based marine big data fusion for ocean environment monitoring: Towards shape optimization and salient objects detection. Front. Mar. Sci., 9.10.3389/fmars.2022.1094915 ↗
32. Yan, Z., Hao, L., Yang, J., and Zhou, J. (2024). Real-Time Underwater Fish Detection and Recognition Based on CBAM-YOLO Network with Lightweight Design. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12081302 ↗
33. Dinakaran, R., Zhang, L., Li, C.-T., Bouridane, A., and Jiang, R. (2022). Robust and Fair Undersea Target Detection with Automated Underwater Vehicles for Biodiversity Data Collection. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14153680 ↗
34. Li, Z., Zheng, B., Chao, D., Zhu, W., Li, H., Duan, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Fu, W., and Zhang, Y. (2024). Underwater-Yolo: Underwater Object Detection Network with Dilated Deformable Convolutions and Dual-Branch Occlusion Attention Mechanism. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12122291 ↗
35. Tong, C., Li, B., Wu, J., and Xu, X. (2025). Developing a Dead Fish Recognition Model Based on an Improved YOLOv5s Model. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15073463 ↗
36. Visual sensing on marine robotics for the 3D documentation of Underwater Cultural Heritage: A review10.1016/j.jas.2024.105985 ↗
37. A novel robotic visual perception framework for underwater operation10.1631/FITEE.2100366 ↗
38. Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, H., Liu, Z., and Liu, J. (2023). Design and Realization of a Novel Robotic Manta Ray for Sea Cucumber Recognition, Location, and Approach. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8040345 ↗
39. Wang, S., Han, Y., and Mao, S. (2021). Innovation Concept Model and Prototype Validation of Robotic Fish with a Spatial Oscillating Rigid Caudal Fin. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9040435 ↗
40. Zhang, H., and Zhang, S. (2023). Shape-IoU: More Accurate Metric considering Bounding Box Shape and Scale. arXiv.
41. Tong, Z., Chen, Y., Xu, Z., and Yu, R. (2023). Wise-IoU: Bounding Box Regression Loss with Dynamic Focusing Mechanism. arXiv.
42. Chen, J., Kao, S.H., He, H., Zhuo, W., Wen, S., Lee, C.H., and Chan, S.H.G. (2023, January 17–24). Run, Don’t Walk: Chasing Higher FLOPS for Faster Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.01157 ↗