MultiScaleFusion-Net and ResRNN-Net: Proposed Deep Learning Architectures for Accurate and Interpretable Pregnancy Risk Prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
Women exhibit marked physiological transformations in pregnancy, mandating regular and holistic assessment. Maternal and fetal vitality is governed by a spectrum of clinical, demographic, and lifestyle factors throughout this critical period. The existing maternal health monitoring techniques lack precision in assessing pregnancy-related risks, often leading to late interventions and adverse outcomes. Accurate and timely risk prediction is crucial to avoid miscarriages. This research proposes a deep learning framework for personalized pregnancy risk prediction using the NFHS-5 dataset, and class imbalance is addressed through a hybrid NearMiss-SMOTE approach. Fifty-one primary features are selected via the LASSO to refine the dataset and enhance model interpretability and efficiency. The framework integrates a multimodal model (NFHS-5, fetal plane images, and EHG time series) along with two core architectures. ResRNN-Net further combines Bi-LSTM, CNNs, and attention mechanisms to capture sequential dependencies. MultiScaleFusion-Net leverages GRU and multiscale convolutions for effective feature extraction. Additionally, TabNet and MLP models are explored to compare interpretability and computational efficiency. SHAP and Grad-CAM are used to ensure transparency and explainability, offering both feature importance and visual explanations of predictions. The proposed models are trained using 5-fold stratified cross-validation and evaluated with metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC–AUC. The results demonstrate that MultiScaleFusion-Net balances accuracy and computational efficiency, making it suitable for real-time clinical deployment, while ResRNN-Net achieves higher precision at a slight computational cost. Performance comparisons with baseline machine learning models confirm the superiority of deep learning approaches, achieving over 80% accuracy in pregnancy complication prediction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Topic Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth SY23 3FL, UK
Department of Physics, Aberystwyth University, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth SY23 3FL, UK
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Applying advanced data analytics on pregnancy complications to predict miscarriage with explainable AI10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3486058 ↗
2. Predicting risk of stillbirth and preterm pregnancies with machine learning10.1007/s13755-020-00105-9 ↗
3. A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Toward medical XAI10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3027314 ↗
4. Mhatre, R.S., and Bakal, W.J. (2024, January 4–6). Fetal anomaly detection in ultrasound images: A review of deep learning-based approaches. Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Automation, Computing and Renewable Systems (ICACRS), Pudukkottai, India.10.1109/ICACRS62842.2024.10841653 ↗
5. The evolution of prenatal care delivery guidelines in the United States10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.016 ↗
6. Early warning indicators of severe maternal outcomes: A multicountry, facility-based study10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00468-0 ↗
7. World Health Organization (WHO) (2024, December 02). Maternal Mortality Evidence Brief Key Facts. Available online: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/329886/WHO-RHR-19.20-eng.pdf.
8. Automated labour detection framework to monitor pregnant women with a high risk of premature labour using machine learning and deep learning10.1016/j.imu.2021.100771 ↗
9. Comprehensive pregnancy monitoring with a network of wireless, soft, and flexible sensors in high- and low-resource health settings10.1073/pnas.2100466118 ↗
10. Nurmaini, S., Partan, R.U., Bernolian, N., Sapitri, A.I., Tutuko, B., Rachmatullah, M.N., Darmawahyuni, A., Firdaus, F., and Mose, J.C. (2022). Deep learning for improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart diseases. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11216454 ↗
11. Alim, A., and Imtiaz, M.H. (2023). Wearable sensors for the monitoring of maternal health—A systematic review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23052411 ↗
12. Review on deep learning fetal brain segmentation from magnetic resonance images10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102608 ↗
13. Predicting first time depression onset in pregnancy: Applying machine learning methods to patient-reported data10.1007/s00737-024-01474-w ↗
14. Yang, X., Wang, R., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., and Wang, F. (2024). Predicting risk of the subsequent early pregnancy loss in women with recurrent pregnancy loss based on preconception data. BMC Women’s Health, 24.10.1186/s12905-024-03206-9 ↗
15. Multi-Scale Three-Path Network (MSTP-Net): A new architecture for retinal vessel segmentation10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117100 ↗
16. Survey on deep learning in multimodal medical imaging for cancer detection
17. Wang, F., Silvestre, G., and Curran, K. (2024). MiTU-Net: A fine-tuned U-Net with SegFormer backbone for segmenting pubic symphysis-fetal head. arXiv.
18. Csillag, D., Paes, L.M., Ramos, T., Romano, J.V., Schuller, R., Seixas, R.B., Oliveira, R.I., and Orenstein, P. (March, January 25). AmnioML: Amniotic fluid segmentation and volume prediction with uncertainty quantification. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
19. Prior-guided attribution of deep neural networks for obstetrics and gynecology10.1109/JBHI.2023.3337511 ↗
20. Therapeutic effect of mifepristone combined with misoprostol in early missed miscarriage and prediction of incomplete abortion10.4103/apjr.apjr_214_24 ↗
21. Lee, C.-I., Wang, T.-E., Chen, C.-H., Huang, C.-C., Tsao, H.-M., Lee, T.-H., Chang, T.A., Hsu, C.-T., and Lee, M.-S. (2025). Personalized prediction model for miscarriage: In-depth sperm DNA fragmentation. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 1–11.10.1007/s10815-025-03445-1 ↗
22. Prediction of postpartum depression in women: Development and validation of multiple machine learning models10.1186/s12967-025-06289-6 ↗
23. Systematic review of clinical prediction models for the risk of emergency caesarean births10.1111/1471-0528.17948 ↗
24. (2025, January 07). EHG Time Series Dataset. Available online: https://physionet.org/content/ehgdb/1.0.0/.
25. Hypertension prediction using deep learning with transfer learning techniques10.33003/fjs-2024-0806-2855 ↗
26. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
27. Gao, C., Osmundson, S., Edwards, D.R.V., Jackson, G.P., Malin, B.A., and Chen, Y. (2019). Deep learning predicts extreme preterm birth from electronic health records. J. Biomed. Inform., 100.10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103334 ↗
28. A review on deep-learning algorithms for fetal ultrasound-image analysis10.1016/j.media.2022.102629 ↗
29. Islam, M.N., Mustafina, S.N., Mahmud, T., and Khan, I. (2022). Machine learning to predict pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 22.10.1186/s12884-022-04594-2 ↗
30. Tempel, F., Groos, D., Ihlen, E.A., Adde, L., and Strümke, I. (2024). Choose your explanation: A comparison of SHAP and GradCAM in human activity recognition. arXiv.
31. Statistical insights into machine learning-based box models for pregnancy care and maternal mortality reduction: A literature survey10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3399827 ↗
32. Micucci, M., and Iula, A. (2022). Recent advances in machine learning applied to ultrasound imaging. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11111800 ↗
33. Machine learning-based prediction model of preterm birth using electronic health record10.1155/2022/9635526 ↗
34. Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems for pregnancy care: A systematic review10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105040 ↗
35. Hi-Le and HiTCLe: Ensemble learning approaches for early diabetes detection using deep learning and explainable artificial intelligence10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3398198 ↗
36. Ukrit, M.F., Jeyavathana, R.B., Rani, A.L., and Chana, V. (2024, January 22–23). Maternal Health Risk Prediction with Machine Learning Methods. Proceedings of the 2024 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE), Vellore, India.10.1109/ic-ETITE58242.2024.10493737 ↗
37. PregnancyLine: A Visual Analysis System for Pregnancy Care and Risk Communication10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3204694 ↗
38. Tripathy, S.S., Imoize, A.L., Rath, M., Tripathy, N., Bebortta, S., Lee, C., Chen, T., Ojo, S., Isabona, J., and Pani, S.K. (2022). A novel edge-computing-based framework for an intelligent smart healthcare system in smart cities. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010735 ↗
39. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts and challenges in healthcare10.3390/ai4030034 ↗
40. Singh, R. (2024, December 10). NFHS-5 Dataset on Kaggle. Available online: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ravisinghiitbhu/nfhs5.
41. (2025, February 01). Medical Imaging Dataset. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/3904280.